1887

Abstract

Summary

This paper focuses on quantitative characterizing the uncertainty of bounding fault in rift basin, especially in the field with seismic dataset of poor quality. An assessment method based on factorial experimental design is presented to analyze the influences of bounding fault uncertainty on gross reservoir volume (GRV).

The new approach is based on a series of flexible 3D geological model cases. A three levels factorial experiment design is used to evaluate the effects of three factors considered in the calculation of GRV. The response surface function obtained to find the best inherent relationship between the fault parameters and GRV by a nonlinear equation.

The high correlation coefficient proves the validity of the model. Results show that GRV has a significant linear relationship with the lateral displacement distance of the bounding fault, and GRV also shows a less strong linear relation dip change of the bounding fault. However, GRV is not correlated with strike change, even the strike change will lead to a slight increase in GRV.

The novelty of this new approach is in the ability to quantitatively assess the uncertainty of bounding fault even the seismic evidence is insufficient to depict fault features.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901459
2019-06-03
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. XuW., FangL., ZhangX.Y., et al.
    , 2017. Object-based 3D geomodel with multiple constraints for early Pliocene fan delta in the south of Lake Albert Basin, Uganda. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 125: 1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. SimonB, GuillocheauF, C.Robin, et al.
    , 2017. Deformation and sedimentary evolution of the Lake Albert Rift (Uganda, East African Rift System). Marine and Petroleum Geology, 86: 17–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Moeinikia, F., Alizadeh, N.
    , 2012. Experimental Design in reservoir simulation: an integrated solution for uncertainty analysis, a case study. J. Petrol. Exploration Prod. Technol.2(2), 75–83.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Arinkoola, A.O., Ogbe, D.O.
    , 2015. Examination of experimental designs and response surface methods for uncertainty analysis of production forecast: a Niger delta case study. J. Petrol. Eng.3, 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Irving, A. D, Chavanne, E, Faure, V, et al.
    , 2010. An uncertainty modelling workflow for structurally compartmentalized reservoirs. Geological Society London Special Publications347(1):283–299.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. PerRøe, FrodeGeorgsen, PetterAbrahamsen
    , 2014. An Uncertainty Model for Fault Shape and Location. Mathematical Geosciences46(8):1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901459
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901459
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error