1887

Abstract

Summary

Factorial Kriging (FKr) is an efficient noise attenuation technique for seismic data. This geostatistical filtering technique relies on a spatial covariance model composed of independent noise and signal elements. When combined with a local-covariance based approach it leads to a dip-steered solution, meaning driven by local dip and azimuths attached to the signal component of the model. Moreover the use of spatially varying covariance parameters related to the noise component(s) opens the door to the processing of non-stationary noise.

With the use of local covariance parameters, the classical FKr solution requires a moving neighborhood, even if applied on a grid. It has two main inconveniences: the high computation time cost due to the multiplication of local kriging systems to solve and the possible generation of local artefacts caused by the limited dimensions of the neighborhood.

In this paper, we present a new FKr solution which enables to tackle these problems. It is based on Stochastic Partial Differential Equations (SPDE). A theoretical description is given in the first part of the paper. In the second part, we show the results of the very first application of the SPDE FKr solution to some pre-stack data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900848
2019-06-03
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. FouedjioF., DesassisN., RomaryT.
    (2015). Estimation of space deformation model for non-stationary random functions. Spatial statistics, 13, 45–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. HoeberH., ColeouT., LemeurD.
    (2003). On the use of geostatistical filtering techniques in seismic processing. Journées de Géostatistique, Fontainebleau, France.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. LindgrenF., RueH., LindströmJ.
    (2011). An explicit link between Gaussian fields and Gaussian Markov random fields: the stochastic partial differential equation approach. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 73(4), 423–498.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. MagneronC., DeraismeJ., JeanneeN.
    (2005). M-Factorial Kriging for seismic data noise attenuation. SBGF 9th Congress, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. PereiraM., DesassisN.
    (2018). Finite element approximation of non-Markovian random fields. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.03004.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. PiazzaJ.-L., MagneronC., DemonginT., MüllerN.A.
    (2015). M-Factorial Kriging: an efficient aid to noisy seismic data interpretation. EAGE Petroleum Geostatistics, Biarritz, France.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. StefanouG.
    (2009). The stochastic finite element method: past, present and future. Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 198(9–12), 1031–1051.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. WackernagelH.
    (2003). Multivariate Geostatistics: an introduction with applications. Third Edition. Springer Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. WhittleP.
    (1954). On stationary processes in theplane. Biometrika, 434–449.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. ZienkiewiczO. C., Taylor, R. L.
    (1977). The finite element method (Vol. 36). London: McGraw-hill.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900848
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900848
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error