Optimal Surface and Subsurface Parameters for a Successful Migration Velocity Analysis

References

1. Chauris, H. and Cocher, E.
   [2017] From migration to inversion velocity analysis. Geophysics, 82(3), S207–S223.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Fu, L. and Symes, W.W.
   [2015] Reducing the cost of extended waveform inversion by multiscale adaptive methods. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2015, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 1127–1131.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Hou, J. and Symes, W.W.
   [2015] An approximate inverse to the extended Born modeling operator. Geophysics, 80(6), R331–R349.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Lameloise, C.A., Chauris, H. and Noble, M.
   [2015] Improving the gradient of the image-domain objective function using quantitative migration for a more robust migration velocity analysis. Geophysical prospecting, 63(2), 391–404.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Liu, Y., Symes, W.W. and Li, Z.
   [2014] Inversion velocity analysis via differential semblance optimization. In: 76th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2014.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Mulder, W.A.
   [2014] Subsurface offset behaviour in velocity analysis with extended reflectivity images. Geophysical Prospecting, 62(1), 17–33.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Nocedal, J. and Wright, S.J.
   [2006] Numerical optimization. 2nd Edition. Springer.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Sava, P. and Fomel, S.
   [2006] Time-shift imaging condition in seismic migration. Geophysics, 71(6), S209–S217.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Symes, W.W.
   [2008] Approximate linearized inversion by optimal scaling of prestack depth migration. Geophysics, 73(2), R23–R35.
   [Google Scholar]