1887

Abstract

Summary

Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) is a geophysical method for non-destructive inspection of underground infrastructure. The main impediment to machine-learning-based classification of GPR data is gathering enough labeled data. Previous work done to solve this problem generated pseudo-GPR data through the numerical simulations done with expensive GPU clusters.

In this paper, we propose a simple yet effective framework for machine learning with GPR data without enormous computational cost. The key idea of our method is quasi-measurement pitch changes (QMPC) that can obtain several times the amount of pseudo-data from real measurements. QMPCs are based on a simple sub-sampling procedure from real data, and no interpolation is applied for the pseudo-data. Thus, special hardware like GPU clusters are not required and no artifacts are produced by such an interpolation. Moreover, using QMPCs for test data allows us to apply ensemble learning at the inference phase of machine learning.

The experimental results for the classification problem of buried objects clearly show that our framework can drastically improve accuracy with additional labeled data and without significantly increasing computational cost.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902581
2019-09-08
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. X. Y.Xie, H.Qin, G.Hong, Y. F.Chen, and K.Zeng
    , “Crosshole radar for underground structure defect detection: System design and model experiment,” in 2016 16th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), June 2016, pp. 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. M.Sato and K.Kikuta
    , “Dual sensor alis for humanitarian demining,” in IGARSS 2018 - 2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, July 2018, pp. 8428–8431.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. M.Pieraccini, L.Capineri, P.Falorni, and D.Devis
    , “Gpr investigation of fortezza da basso (lower fortress) in florence, italy,” in 2016 16th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), June 2016, pp. 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. M.Sato
    , “Gpr arachaeological survey for preservation of culural heritages,” in 2017 9th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar (IWAGPR), June 2017, pp. 1–4.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. S. S.Todkar, C.Le Bastard, A.Ihamouten, V.Baltazart, X.Drobert, C.Fauchard, D.Guilbert, and F.Bosc
    , “Detection of debondings with ground penetrating radar using a machine learning method,” in 2017 9th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar (IWAGPR), June 2017, pp. 1–6.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. J.Sonoda and T.Kimoto
    , “Object identification form gpr images by deep learning,” in 2018 Asia-Pacific Microwave Conference (APMC), Nov. 2018, pp. 1298–1300.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. D.Reichman, L. M.Collins, and J. M.Malof
    , “Some good practices for applying convolutional neural networks to buried threat detection in ground penetrating radar,” in 2017 9th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar (IWAGPR), June 2017, pp. 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. L. B.Liu, R. Y.Qian, J.Li, M. G.Sun, and S. C.Ge
    , “Gpr detection of subsurface voids and its validation based on similarity principle,” in 2016 16th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), June 2016, pp. 1–4.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Y.Li, H.Chen, L.Zhang, and L.Cheng
    , “Mammographic mass detection based on convolution neural network,” in 2018 24th International Conference on Pattern Recogni tion (ICPR), Aug. 2018, pp. 3850–3855.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. P. A.Torrione, K. D.Morton, R.Sakaguchi, and L. M.Collins
    , “Histograms of oriented gradients for landmine detection in ground-penetrating radar data,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 1539–1550, March 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. M.Pham and S.Lefevre
    , “Buried object detection from b-scan ground penetrating radar data using faster-rcnn,” in IGARSS 2018 - 2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, July 2018, pp. 6804–6807.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. D.Reichman, L. M.Collins, and J. M.Malof
    , “On choosing training and testing data for supervised algorithms in ground-penetrating radar data for buried threat detection,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 497–507, Jan. 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902581
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902581
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error