1887

Abstract

Summary

In this work we consider the problem of developing algorithms for automatic buried threat detection (BTD) in ground penetrating radar (GPR) data. Many such algorithms are supervised, and perform best when they can be trained on large quantities of labeled threat and non-threat GPR data, respectively. Unfortunately, such data is costly to collect, and therefore relatively scarce. One approach to mitigate this problem is data augmentation, in which novel training data is created by applying transformations to existing data. Prior work has shown that augmentation can indeed improve the training of GPR-based BTD algorithms. In this work, we explore the use of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) for data augmentation. GANs can be trained to generate novel, but highly realistic, data after training on a real-world dataset. GANs have yielded impressive results on many types of data, but they are notoriously difficult to train. In this work, we propose an approach, entitled featureGAN, that mitigates some of the challenges training GANs. We show that augmentation using featureGAN yields improved detection performance, and yields better performance than some naïve alternative augmentation strategies. We also propose a metric for quantifying the success of GAN training, called the q-metric, which was crucial to achieving good results.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902604
2019-09-08
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. D. P.Nabelek and K. C.Ho
    , “Detection of deeply buried non-metal objects by ground penetrating radar using non-negative matrix factorization,” SPIE Defense+ Secur., vol. 9454, no. May 2015, pp. 945419–945419, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. A.Hamdi, O.Missaoui, and H.Frigui
    , “AN SVM classifier with HMM-based kernel for landmine detection using ground penetrating radar,” 2010 IEEE Int. Geosci. Remote Sens. Symp., pp. 4196–4199, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. F.Abujarad, G.Nadim, and A.Omar
    , “Wavelet packets for GPR detection of non-metallic anti-personnel land mines based on higher-order-statistic,” Proc. 3rd Int. Work. Adv. Gr. Penetrating Radar, IWAGPR 2005, pp. 21–24, 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. V.Kovalenko, A. G.Yarovoy, and L. P.Ligthart
    , “Alternating-Sign Windowed Energy Projection of SAR Focused GPR Data,” Eur. Radar Conf., no. 0, pp. 415–418, 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. B.Joshi, B.Hayk, A.Al-hinai, and W. L. W. B
    , “Rooftop Detection for Planning of Solar PV Deployment: A Case Study in Abu Dhabi,” Data Anal. Renew. Energy Integr., vol. 8817, pp. 137–149, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. J. M.Malof, D.Reichman, A.Karem, H.Frigui, D.Ho, N.Joseph, W.Lee, W.Cummings, and L. M.Collins
    , “A Large-Scale Multi-Institutional Evaluation of Advanced Discrimination Algorithms for Buried Threat Detection in Ground Penetrating Radar,” arXiv preprint, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.03729.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. D.Reichman, L. M.Collins, and J. M.Malof
    , “Some Good Practices for Applying Convolutional Neural Networks to Buried Threat Detection in Ground Penetrating Radar,” in 9th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar (IWAGPR), 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. J.Bralich, D.Reichman, L. M.Collins, and J. M.Malof
    , “Improving convolutional neural networks for buried threat in ground penetrating radar using transfer learning via pretraining,” SPIE Defenses Secur., vol. 10182, p. 101820X–101820X, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. L. E.Besaw
    , “Detecting buried explosive hazards with handheld GPR and deep learning,” SPIE Defenses Secur., vol. 9823, p. 98230N–98230N, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. F.Picetti, G.Testa, F.Lombardi, P.Bestagini, M.Lualdi, and S.Tubaro
    , “Convolutional Autoencoder for Landmine Detection on GPR Scans,” 2018 41st Int. Conf. Telecommun. Signal Process., pp. 1–4, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. A.Radford, L.Metz, and S.Chintala
    , “Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networks,” pp. 1–15, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. J. N.Wilson, P.Gader, W.-H. H.Lee, H.Frigui, and K. C.Ho
    , “A large-scale systematic evaluation of algorithms using ground-penetrating radar for landmine detection and discrimination,” Geosci. Remote Sensing, IEEE Trans., vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 2560–2572, 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. H.Frigui and P. D.Gader
    , “Detection and discrimination of land mines in ground-penetrating radar based on edge histogram descriptors and a possibilistic K-nearest neighbor classifier,” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 185–199, 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. D.Reichman, L. M.Collins, and J. M.Malof
    , “Improvements to the Histogram of Oriented Gradient ( HOG ) Prescreener for Buried Threat Detection in Ground Penetrating Radar Data,” in SPIE Defense, Security, and Sensing, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. A.Hamdi and H.Frigui
    , “Ensemble hidden Markov models with application to landmine detection,” EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process., vol. 2015, no. 1, p. 75, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. A.Karem, A.Fadeev, H.Frigui, and P.Gader
    , “Comparison of different classification algorithms for landmine detection using GPR,” Russell J. Bertrand Russell Arch., vol. 7664, no. May 2011, p. 76642K–76642K-11, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. S. E.Yuksel, J.Bolton, and P. D.Gader
    , “Landmine detection with Multiple Instance Hidden Markov Models,” in IEEE International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing, 2012, no. 0730484, pp. 1–6.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. J.Bolton, S. E.Yuksel, and P. D.Gader
    , “Multiple instance learning for hidden Markov models: application to landmine detection,” in SPIE Defenses Security, 2013, vol. 8709, p. 87091M.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. P. A.Torrione, K. D.Morton, R.Sakaguchi, and L. M.Collins
    , “Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Landmine Detection in Ground-Penetrating Radar Data,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 1539–1550, Mar. 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. D.Reichman, L. M.Collins, and J. M.Malof
    , “On Choosing Training and Testing Data for Supervised Algorithms in Ground Penetrating Radar Data for Buried Threat Detection,” Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 497–507.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. C. R.Ratto, K. D. M.Jr, L. M.Collins, and P. A.Torrione
    , “A Hidden Markov Context Model for GPR-based Landmine Detection Incorporating Stick-Breaking Priors,” IGARSS, pp. 874–877, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. H.Frigui and P.Gader
    , “Detection and discrimination of land mines based on edge histogram descriptors and fuzzy K-nearest neighbors,” IEEE Int. Conf. Fuzzy Syst., pp. 1494–1499, 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. T.Che, Y.Li, A. P.Jacob, Y.Bengio, and W.Li
    , “Mode Regularized Generative Adversarial Networks,” pp. 1–13, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. M.Arjovsky and L.Bottou
    , “Towards Principled Methods for Training Generative Adversarial Networks,” pp. 1–17, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. A.Borji
    , “Pros and cons of GAN evaluation measures,” Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. J. M.Malof, D.Reichman, and L. M.Collins
    , “How do we choose the best model? The impact of cross-validation design on model evaluation for buried threat detection in ground penetrating radar,” in SPIE Defenses Security, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. S. E.Yuksel, J.Bolton, and P.Gader
    , “Multiple-instance hidden markov models with applications to landmine detection,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 53, no. 12, pp. 6766–6775, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902604
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902604
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error