1887

Abstract

Summary

Aim of the research was to examine influence of single sensor interval and application of single sensor vs geophone array on 2D seismic data quality. Seismic data were acquired at two 2D lines with different sensor configuration. Line 1 was acquired with single sensor on 25m separation between sensors and with geophone linear array. Line 2 was acquired with single sensor at 12,5m spacing from which we obtained two data sets: with 12,5m single sensor spacing and with 25m single sensor spacing. All data sets were processed in a same way, with optimal parameters for each data set. Geophone array is giving us better coherency of reflections on stack section, leading to more geological details we can interpret. With geophone array ground roll is suppressed on later times, giving us better resolution and higher dominant frequencies in deeper parts. With 12,5 m useful signal is better preserved and it’s not spatial aliased. Ground roll is more efficiently removed on 12,5 m interval then on 25 m. Recommendation for future surveys with single sensor is to further decrease interval between sensors. This will also lead to better removal of ground roll and preserve more geological information for structural and quantitative interpretation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902626
2019-09-18
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AndersonJ., SmartA. and ShabrawiA.
    [2005] Solving an imaging problem in Kuwait Oil Company’s Minagish field using single-sensor acquisition and processing. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2005: pp. 502–505.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baeten, V. G., Belougne, T., Brice, L., Combee, E., Kragh, A., Laake, J., Martin, J., Orban, A., Özbek, and VermeerP.
    [2001] Acquisition and processing of single sensor seismic data. ASEG Extended Abstracts 2001: 15th Geophysical Conference: pp. 1–4.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. CortesM. D., EcopetrolS.A., and JackCaldwell
    [2015] Single Geophone versus Geophone Array: A field study performed in Colombia. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2015: pp. 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. DreceaA., PaneaI. and NichisoiuR.
    [2014] Linear versus non-linear receiver arrays in seismic exploration for hydrocarbons. GEO 2014 Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. JasonC.
    , [2019] The enigma of arrays, First Break, 37(1), 45 – 47.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. VermeerG. J. O.
    , [2002] 3-D Seismic Survey Design. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902626
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902626
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error