1887
Volume 22, Issue 9
  • ISSN: 0263-5046
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2397

Abstract

Can you really trust your data? Eleanor Jack, senior geophysicist, Landmark Graphics, offers some cautionary tales about what can go wrong with stored seismic data and what companies can do to better manage and protect their data. It is usually assumed, at least by the data owner, that when copying data from one medium to another, all the data on the original are safely transferred to their destination. Data management papers generally tend to reinforce this view, with flow charts using boxes and arrows to indicate data transfer, which by implication is seamless and trouble-free. But sadly this is not always the case, as this paper will demonstrate. Data can get lost or corrupted and this corruption waits unnoticed, like a sleeper, until the data are needed. Data transcription and copying are generally outsourced activities performed by a specialist company. Such a company will be expert at transferring data in the most efficient manner, with well-tried transcription software to translate the various acquisition and processing formats into the standard exchange format, SEG-Y. All reputable transcription companies will also perform some level of quality control. However, a combination of cost pressures and lack of understanding of the nature of the data and their formats mean that a significant percentage of data is archived with hidden corruption or loss. Some typical examples, which escaped this initial QC check, are shown here.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/0.3997/1365-2397.22.9.26011
2004-09-01
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/0.3997/1365-2397.22.9.26011
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error