1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Near Surface Geophysics
  4. Volume 10, Issue 3
  5. Article
Volume 10 Number 3
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Time‐Domain Reflectometry (TDR) has been used extensively in the past thirty years in order to measure soil water content and bulk electrical conductivity (), both in the laboratory and in the field. TDR can be effectively used in combination with geophysical techniques such as Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) in order to provide information on relative dielectric permittivity and . As part of the Mapping the Underworld project, a TDR monitoring station was constructed with the aim of monitoring the geophysical parameters of the soil in a field case study. A rigorous methodology, utilizing the latest knowledge for calibration and analysis was followed and is thoroughly elucidated in this paper. The reasons behind the choice of the equipment setup are described, with the intention of providing a reference for similar TDR field installations. The precision and accuracy of TDR and the validation of the calibration procedures were assessed with laboratory and field tests. The standard deviation of several TDR measurements in the laboratory was on average smaller than 2% for both apparent permittivity and . The accuracy, expressed as the mean difference to reference values, was on average smaller than 2% and 3% of apparent permittivity and respectively, although higher errors, up to ≈ 5% and ≈ 7.5% respectively, were measured in media with very low apparent permittivity (i.e., air) and at values smaller than 0.0010 S/m. These results demonstrate that with the chosen methodology and setup, TDR can provide reliable data and can be used for long‐term geophysical monitoring. The data provided by TDR monitoring stations could contribute to a data base of geophysical properties for soils. This information may eventually be used to assist the fine tuning of shallow geophysical techniques such as GPR.

© European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers © 2012 European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.103001
2011-12-01
2024-04-19

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1002/nsg.103001
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BakerJ.M. and AllmarasR.R.1990. System for automating and multiplexing soil moisture measurement by time‐domain reflectometry. Soil Science Society of America Journal54, 1–6.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. BechtoldM., HuismanJ.A., WeihermüllerL. and VereeckenH.2010. Accurate Determination of the Bulk Electrical Conductivity with the TDR100 Cable Tester. Soil Science Society of America Journal74, 495–501.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. CassidyN.J.2008. Electrical and magnetic properties of rocks, soils and fluids. In: Ground Penetrating Radar Theory and Applications (ed. H.M.Jol. ), pp. 41–72. Elsevier Science.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Chemical Rubber Company
    Chemical Rubber Company1972. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 53rd edition 1972–1973.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. DaltonF.N., HerkelrathW.N., RawlinsD.S. and RhoadesJ.D.1984. Time‐domain reflectometry: Simultaneous measurement of soil water content and electrical conductivity with a single probe. Science224, 989–990.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. GieseK. and TiemannR.1975. Determination of the complex permittivity from thin‐sample time domain reflectometry improved analysis of the step waveform. Advances in molecular relaxation and interaction processes7, 414–424.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. HeimovaaraT.J. and BoutenW.1990. A computer‐controlled 36‐channel time domain reflectometry system for monitoring soil water contents. Water Resources Research26, 2311–2316.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. HeimovaaraT.J., FockeA.G., BoutenW. and VerstratenJ.M.1995. Assessing temporal variation in soil water composition with time domain reflectometry. Soil Science Society of America Journal59, 689–698.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. HuismanJ.A., HubbardS.S., RedmanJ.D. and AnnanA.P.2003. Measuring soil water content with ground penetrating radar: A review. Vadose Zone Journal2, 476–491.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. HuismanJ.A., LinC.P., WeihermüllerL. and VereeckenH.2008. Accuracy of bulk electrical conductivity measurements with time domain reflectometry. Vadose Zone Journal7, 426–433.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. JonesS.B., WraithJ.M. and OrD.2002. Time domain reflectometry measurement principles and applications. Hydrological Processes16, 141–153.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. LinC.P., ChungC.C., HuismanJ.A. and TangS.H.2008. Clarification and calibration of reflection coefficient for electrical conductivity measurement by time domain reflectometry. Soil Science Society of America Journal72, 1033–1040.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. LinC.P., ChungC.C. and TangS.H.2007. Accurate time domain reflectometry measurement of electrical conductivity accounting for cable resistance and recording times. Soil Science Society of America Journal71, 1278–1287.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. MenzianiM., RivasiM.R., PugnaghiS., SantagneloR. and VincenziS.1996. Soil volumetric water content measurements using TDR technique. Annuali di geofisica (Annals of geophysics)39, 91–95.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. MetjeN., AtkinsP.R., BrennanM.J., ChapmanD.N., LimH.M., MachellJ. et al. 2007. Mapping the underworld – State‐of‐the‐art review. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology22, 568–586.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. NelderJ.A. and MeadR.1965. A simplex method for function minimisation. Computer Journal7, 308–313.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. ReeceC.F.1998. Simple method for determining cable length resistance in time domain reflectometry systems. Soil Science Society of America Journal62, 314–317.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. RobinsonD.A., JonesS.B., WraithJ.M., OrD. and FriedmanS.P.2003a. A review of advances in dielectric and electrical conductivity measurement in soils using time domain reflectometry. Vadose Zone Journal2, 444–475.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. RobinsonD.A., SchaapM., JonesS.B., FriedmanS.P. and GardnerC.M.K.2003b. Considerations for improving the accuracy of permittivity measurement using time domain reflectometry: Air‐water calibration, effects of cable length. Soil Science Society of America Journal67, 62–70.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. ThomasA.M., ChapmanD.N., RogersC.D.F. and MetjeN.2010a. Electromagnetic properties of the ground: Part I ‐ Fine grained soils at the liquid limit. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology25, 714–722.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. ThomasA.M., ChapmanD.N., RogersC.D.F. and MetjeN.2010b. Electromagnetic properties of the ground: Part II ‐ The properties of two selected fine‐grained soils. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology25, 723–730.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. ToppG.C., DavisJ.L. and AnnanA.P.1980. Electromagnetic determination of soil‐water content – Measurements in coaxial transmission‐lines. Water Resources Research16, 574–582.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. ToppG.C., DavisJ.L. and AnnanA.P.2003. The early development of TDR for soil measurements. Vadose Zone Journal2, 492–499.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. ToppG.C., ZegelinS. and WhiteI.2000. Impacts of the real and imaginary components of relative permittivity on time domain reflectometry measurements in soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal64, 1244–1252.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. VenablesW.N., SmithD.M. and the R development core team2010. An introduction to R: Notes on R: A programming environment for data analysis and graphics. Version 2.13.0.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. ZegelinS.J., WhiteI. and JenkinsD.R.1989. Improved field probes for soil water content and electrical conductivity measurement using time domain reflectometry. Water Resources Research25, 2367–2376.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.103001
Loading
Construction and calibration of a field TDR monitoring station
Near Surface Geophysics 10, 249 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1002/nsg.103001
/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.103001
/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.103001
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error