1887
Volume 16, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

To this date, estimation of hydraulic transmissivity with magnetic resonance sounding (MRS) requires transmissivity values from pumping tests in nearby wells in order to determine a calibration constant from the relationship between both types of data. The use of this technique is limited due to the fact that reported values of this calibration constant are highly variable, even within the same type of aquifer. In order to minimize this shortcoming, a new methodology, which has been developed and presented here, is used to estimate the transmissivity of detrital aquifers with heterogeneous behaviour based only on the results obtained by MRS. The exponents applied to decay time and free porosity used in the expression to compute MRS transmissivity have conventionally been fixed values. In contrast, the work presented here aims to improve the applicability of this technique using a variable exponent for free porosity in each type of aquifer, obtained only from MRS results. In order to achieve this goal, previously published MRS data from four detrital aquifers in the Iberian Peninsula have been used and a relationship between the porosity exponent and a function of decay times and free porosities has been developed. This approach eliminates the need to drill and perform pumping tests in additional boreholes, which has cost and time implications, once the correct expression is determined for a given type of aquifer. The range of values thus obtained for the porosity exponent is similar to that reported in the literature. The deviation of the results obtained with this methodology regarding the results of pumping test is similar to the deviation with conventional process. This suggests that the proposed methodology is appropriate for the aquifers considered, and the approach may be expanded to study other types of aquifers. The drawbacks of the proposal related to the conventional equivalence are explored.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12003
2018-07-27
2020-06-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ArchieG.E.1942. The electrical resistivity logs as an aid in determining some reservoirs characteristics. Transactions of the AIME146, 54–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BoucherM., FavreauG., VouillamozJ.M., NazoumouY. and LegchenkoA.2009. Estimating specific yield and transmissivity with magnetic resonance sounding in an unconfined sandstone aquifer (Niger). Hydrogeology Journal17, 1805–1815.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. ChalikakisK., NielsenM.R. and LegchenkoA.2008. MRS applicability for a study of glacial sedimentary aquifers in Central Jutland, Denmark. Journal of Applied Geophysic66, 176–187.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ChalikakisK., NielsenM.R., LegchenkoA. and HagensenT.F.2009. Investigation of sedimentary aquifers in Denmark using the magnetic resonance sounding method (MRS). Comptes Rendus Geoscience341, 918–927.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Díaz‐CurielJ., BioscaB. and MiguelM.J., 2015. Geophysical estimation of permeability in sedimentary media with Porosities from 0 to 50%. Oil & Gas Science and Technology71, 18.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. DunnK.J., LaTorracaG.A. and BergmanD.J.1999. Permeability relation with other petrophysical parameters for periodic porous media. Geophysics64, 470–478.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. DupuitJ.1863. Etudes Theoriques et Pratiques sur le Mouvement des Eaux dans les Canaux Decouverts et a Travers les Terrains Permeables, 2nd ed. Dunod, Paris.
  8. GüntherT. and Müller‐PetkeM.2012. Hydraulic properties at the North Sea island of Borkum derived from joint inversion of magnetic resonance and electrical resistivity soundings. Hydrology and Earth System Science16, 3279–3291.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. KenyonW.E.1997. Petrophysical principles of applications of NMR logging. The Log Analyst2, 21–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. KenyonW.E., DayP.I., StraleyC. and WillemsenJ.F.1988. A three‐part study of NMR longitudinal relaxation properties of water‐saturated sandstones. SPE Fomation Evaluation3, 622–636.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. KleinbergR.L., StraleyC., KenyonW.E., AkkurtR. and FarooquiS.A.1993. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance of Rocks: T1 vs T2. SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, 3–6 October. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. LegchenkoA., BaltassatJ.M., BeauceA. and BernardJ.2002. Nuclear magnetic resonance as a geophysical tool for hydrogeologists. Journal of Applied Geophysics50, 21–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. LegchenkoA., BaltassatJ.M., BobachevA., MartinC., RobainH. and VouillamozJ.M.2004. Magnetic resonance sounding applied to aquifer characterization. Ground Water42, 363–373.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. MohnkeO. and YaramanciU.2008. Pore size distributions and hydraulic conductivities of rocks derived from magnetic resonance sounding data using multi‐exponential decay time inversion. Journal of Applied Geophysics66, 73–81.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. NielsenM.R., HagensenT.F., ChalikakisK. and LegchenkoA.2011. Comparison of transmissivities from MRS and pumping tests in Denmark. Near Surface Geophysics2011, 211–223.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. PlataJ.L. and RubioF.M.2008. The use of MRS in the determination of hydraulic transmissivity: the case of alluvial aquifers. Journal of Applied Geophysics66, 128–139.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. PlataJ.L., RubioF.M., CarcellerT. and AzcónA.2004. Investigación de parámetros hidrodinámicos y geométricos en acuíferos aluviales de la cuenca del Ebro mediante Sondeos de Resonancia Magnética (SRM). Informe del Fondo Documental del IGME No. 62797 (in Spanish).
  18. RehfeldtK.R., HufschmiedP., GelharL.W. and SchaeferM.E.1989. Measuring hydraulic conductivity with the borehole flowmeter. Topical Report EN‐6511, Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Palo Alto, California, made by Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
  19. RubioF.M. and PlataJ.L.2007. Ensayo para la determinación de parámetros hidrodinámicos en una zona del acuífero Almonte‐marismas (Doñana, Huelva). Informe Fondo Documental IGME (in Spanish).
  20. SeeversD.O.1966. A nuclear magnetic method for determining the permeability of sandstones. Transactions SPWLA, paper L. Society of Petrophysicists and Well‐Log Analysts, Tulsa, OK.
  21. SenP.N., StraleyC., KenyonW.E. and WhittinghamM.S.1990. Surface‐to‐volume ratio, charge density, nuclear magnetic relaxation and permeability in clay‐bearing sandstones. Geophysics55, 61–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. VouillamozJ.M.2003. La caractérisation des aquifères par une méthode non invasive: les sondages par Résonance Magnétique Protonique. PhD Thesis. University of Paris XI, Orsay, France.
  23. VouillamozJ.M., ChatenouxB., MathieuF., BaltassatJ.M. and LegchenkoA.2007. Efficiency of joint use of MRS and VES to characterize coastal Aquifer in Myanmar. Journal of Applied Geophysics61, 142–154.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. VouillamozJ.M., DescloitresM., BernardJ., FourcassierP. and RomagnyL.2002. Application of integrated magnetic resonance sounding and resistivity methods for borehole implementation. A case study in Cambodia. Journal of Applied Geophysics50, 67–81.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12003
Loading
/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12003
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Calibration , Magnetic resonance sounding , Porosity exponent and Transmissivity
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error