1887
Volume 17 Number 3
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Detection of leakage in a buried water pipe is a crucial issue, as underground pipes become aged and these pipes are often used as pathways for aggressive chemical agents. Non‐destructive geophysical methods for identifying such underground leakages are of vital importance. Leakage detection in buried water pipes is sometimes carried out through specific acoustic methods. In this research, we have used ground‐penetrating radar as an alternative to such acoustic methods, because of the high sensitivity of electromagnetic waves to the presence of water in soil. This paper presents a methodology, illustrated by field‐scale ground‐penetrating radar experiments. Four water leakage points in a buried, ductile, iron, main‐water pipe were pre‐designed within a full‐scale (20 m long × 10 m wide) experimental set up. This facility was paved half by reinforced concrete and half by other pavement blocks. Four ground‐penetrating radar antennae with five nominal frequencies 200, 250, 400, 600 and 900 MHz were tested. Using a modified algorithm for common offset ground‐penetrating radar antennae, in this work, we measure the changes in electromagnetic wave velocity and wave reverberation, which sense upward and downward leakages, respectively. Leakages could be identified most clearly in the 600 MHz ground‐penetrating radar data. Our result suggests two potential applications in terms of detecting and defining the extent of multiple leakages in old water pipes, and testing and commissioning new pipes before and after pressurized tests.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12041
2019-05-17
2024-05-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ASTM D6432‐11 . 2011. Standard guide for using the surface ground penetrating radar method for subsurface investigation. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
  2. Ayala‐CabreraD., HerreraM., IzquierdoJ. and Pérez‐GarcíaR.2011. Location of buried plastic pipes using multi‐agent support based on GPR images. Journal of Applied Geophysics75, 679–686.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BimpasM., AmditisA. and UzunogluN.2010. Detection of water leaks in supply pipes using continuous wave sensor operating at 2.45GHz. Journal of Applied Geophysics70, 226–236.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BobylevN.2009. Mainstreaming sustainable development into a city's Master plan: a case of urban underground space use. Land Use Policy26(4), 1128–1137.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BroereW.2016. Urban underground space: solving the problems of today's cities. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology55, 245–248.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. CassidyN.J., EddiesR. and DodsS.2011. Void detection beneath reinforced concrete sections: the practical application of ground‐penetrating radar and ultrasonic techniques. Journal of Applied Geophysics74, 263–276.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. CataldoA., PersicoR., LeucciG., De BenedettoE., CannazzaG., MateraL.et al. 2014. Time domain reflectometry, ground penetrating radar and electrical resistivity tomography: a comparative analysis of alternative approaches for leak detection in underground pipes. NDT & E International62, 14–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. CroccoL., PriscoG., SoldovieriF. and CassidyN.J.2009. Early‐stage leaking pipes GPR monitoring via microwave tomographic inversion. Journal of Applied Geophysics67, 270–277.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. DemirciS., YigitE., EskidemirI.H. and OzdemirC.2012. Ground penetrating radar imaging of water leaks from buried pipes based on back‐projection method. NDT & E International47, 35–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Drainage Services Department . 2016. Sustainability Report 2015–16. The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
  11. FernandesF.M., FernandesA. and PaisJ.2017. Assessment of the density and moisture content of asphalt mixtures of road pavements. (Virtual special issue: ground‐penetrating radar and complementary non‐destructive testing techniques in civil engineering). Construction and Building Materials154, 1216.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. GaoY., BrennanM.J., JosephP.F., MuggletonJ.M. and HunaidiO.2005. On the selection of acoustic/vibration sensors for leak detection in plastic water pipes. Journal of Sound and Vibration283, 927–941.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. GlaserD.R., WerkemaD.D., VersteegR.J., HendersonR.D. and RuckerD.F.2012. Temporal GPR imaging of an ethanol release within a laboratory‐scaled sand tank. Journal of Applied Geophysics86, 133–145.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. GouletJ.‐A., CoutuS. and SmithI.F.C.2013. Model falsification diagnosis and sensor placement for leak detection in pressurized pipe networks. Advanced Engineering Informatics27, 261–269.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. HaoT., RogersC.D.F., MetjeN., ChapmanD.N., MuggletonJ.M., FooK.Y., et al. 2012. Condition assessment of the buried utility service infrastructure. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology28, 331–344.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Highways Standard Drawing H1102B . 2014. Typical Concrete Pavement Construction.
  17. Highways Standard Drawing H1103F . 2014. Paving Units Typical Construction Details.
  18. Highways Standard Drawing H6168 H6169 H6170 . 2014. Minimum Depth Requirement for Underground Services.
  19. LaiW.W.L., ChangR.K.W. and ShamJ.F.C.2017a. Detection and imaging of city's underground void by GPR. Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar (IWAGPR), Edinburgh, UK, June 2017. IEEE.
  20. LaiW.W.L., ChangR.K.W. and ShamJ.F.C.2018. A blind test of nondestructive underground void detection by ground penetrating radar (GPR). Journal of Applied Geophysics149, 10–17.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. LaiW.W.L., ChangR.K.W., ShamJ.F.C. and PangK.2016. Perturbation mapping of water leak in buried water pipes via laboratory validation experiments with high‐frequency ground penetrating radar (GPR). Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology52, 157–167.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. LaiW.W.L., Leong‐Ying HoM., ChangR.K.W., ShamJ.F.C. and PoonC.S. (2017b). Tracing and imaging minor water seepage of concealed PVC pipe in a reinforced concrete wall by high‐frequency ground penetrating radar. Construction and Building Materials151, 840–847.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. LiuZ. and KleinerY.2013. State of the art review of inspection technologies for condition assessment of water pipes. Measurement46, 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. LoizosA. and PlatiC.2007. Accuracy of pavement thicknesses estimation using different ground penetrating radar analysis approaches. NDT & E International40, 147–157.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. MetwalyM.2015. Application of GPR technique for subsurface utility mapping: a case study from urban area of Holy Mecca, Saudi Arabia. Measurement60, 139–145.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. NobesD.C.2017. Ground penetrating radar response from voids: a demonstration using a simple model. NDT & E International91, 47–53.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Ocaña‐LevarioS.J., Carreño‐AlvaradoE.P., Ayala‐CabreraD. and IzquierdoJ.2018. GPR image analysis to locate water leaks from buried pipes by applying variance filters. Journal of Applied Geophysics152, 236–247.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. PregoF.J., SollaM., PuenteI. and AriasP.2017. Efficient GPR data acquisition to detect underground pipes. NDT & E International91, 22–31.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. SagnardF., NorgeotC., DerobertX., BaltazartV., MerliotE., DerkxF., et al. 2016. Utility detection and positioning on the urban site sense‐city using ground‐penetrating radar systems. Measurement88, 318–330.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. ShamJ.F.C. and LaiW.W.L. (2016). Development of a new algorithm for accurate estimation of GPR's wave propagation velocity by common‐offset survey method. NDT & E International83, 104–113.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. ShangguanP., Al‐QadiI., CoenenA. and ZhaoS.2014. Algorithm development for the application of ground‐penetrating radar on asphalt pavement compaction monitoring. International Journal of Pavement Engineering17, 1–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. TostiF., BenedettoA., CiampoliL.B., LambotS., PatriarcaC. and SlobE.C.2016. GPR analysis of clayey soil behaviour in unsaturated conditions for pavement engineering and geoscience applications. Near Surface Geophysics14, 127–144.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. TostiF., CiampoliL.B., D'AmicoF., AlaniA.M. and BenedettoA.2018. An experimental‐based model for the assessment of the mechanical properties of road pavements using ground‐penetrating radar. Construction and Building Materials165, 966–974.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. WallaceM.I. and NgK.C.2016. Development and application of underground space use in Hong Kong. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology incorporating Trenchless Technology Research, 55257–279.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Water Supplies Department . 2017. Water security and climate resilient development. Hong Kong SAR Water Supplies Department.
  36. XieF., WuC.G.‐W., LaiW.W.‐L. and ShamJ.F.‐C.2018. Correction of multi‐frequency GPR wave velocity with distorted hyperbolic reflections from GPR surveys of underground utilities. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology incorporating Trenchless Technology Research76, 76–91.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. YehiaS., QaddoumiN., FarragS. and HamzehL.2014. Investigation of concrete mix variations and environmental conditions on defect detection ability using GPR. NDT & E International65, 35–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. YueD.P.T. and TangS.L.2011. Sustainable strategies on water supply management in Hong Kong. Water and Environment Journal25, 192–199.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12041
Loading
/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12041
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Field validation; GPR; Water pipe leakage

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error