1887
Volume 17 Number 3
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The Cathedral of St John in Valetta, Malta, represents a unique monument of historical importance. In this paper, we present the results of a detailed ground penetrating radar campaign performed in this Cathedral. The campaign was aimed at investigating the distribution of buried tombs under the mosaic floor of the main nave and of the lateral chapels of the Co‐Cathedral. The floor of the church shows a continuity of grave inscriptions in the main nave as well as in all lateral chapels. It was suspected, based on available historical documents, that only a part of the present‐day inscriptions corresponds to the original sepultures or tombs. The ground penetrating radar results presented here further highlight this conjecture and offer additional information regarding this important monument.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12046
2019-05-17
2019-12-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. CataldoA., De BenedettoE. and CannazzaG.2011. Broadband Reflectometry for Enhanced Diagnostics and Monitoring Applications. Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ConyersL.B.2004. Ground Penetrating Radar for Archaeology. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, CA.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. GabelloneF., LeucciG., MasiniN., PersicoR., QuartaG. and GrassoF.2013. Nondestructive prospecting and virtual reconstruction of the chapel of the holy spirit in Lecce, Italy. Near Surface Geophysics11, 231–238.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. GeraldiE., LoperteA. and DolceC.2010. Interpretation of architecture changes by combined use of historical sources, IR Termography and GPR: the study case of San Francesco convent near Montella (AV), Italy. Proceedings of the European Geosciences Union General Assembly 2010, Vienna, May 2–7, 2010.
  5. PersicoR.2014. Introduction to Ground Penetrating Radar: Inverse Scattering and data processing. Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. PersicoR., CiminaleM. and MateraL.2014. A new reconfigurable stepped frequency GPR system, possibilities and issues; applications to two different Cultural Heritage Resources. Near Surface Geophysics12, 793–801.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. PersicoR., D'AmicoS., MateraL., ColicaE., De GiorgioC. and AlescioA.2018. GPR prospecting within the chapel of Aragon within the Co‐cathedral of St. John in Valletta, Malta. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, Rapperwil, Switzerland, June, 18–21, 2018.
  8. PersicoR., MateraL., DesantisV., CongedoF., LambotS. and GotJ.B.2016. Some Limits of the Method of the Diffraction Hyperbolas and a Proposal for its overcoming, Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar GPR2016, Honk Kong, June 13–16, 2016.
  9. PersicoR. and PieracciniM.2018. Measurement of dielectric and magnetic properties of materials by means of a TDR probe. Near Surface Geophysics16, 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. PersicoR. and SoldovieriF.2008. Effects of the background removal in linear inverse scattering. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing46, 1104–1114.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. PersicoR., SoldovieriF. and UtsiE.2010. Microwave tomography for processing of GPR data at Ballachulish. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering7, 164–173.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. PieracciniM., NoferiniL., MecattiD., AtzeniC., PersicoR. and SoldovieriF.2006. Advanced processing techniques for step‐frequency continuous‐wave penetrating radar: the case study of “Palazzo Vecchio” Walls (Firenze, Italy). Research on Nondestructive Evaluation17, 71–83.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. PierriR., LeoneG., SoldovieriF. and PersicoR.2001. Electromagnetic inversion for subsurface applications under the distorted Born approximation, Nuovo Cimento, 24C, 245–261.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. PlatiC. and LoizosA.2013. Estimation of in‐situ density and moisture content in HMA pavements based on GPR trace reflection amplitude using different frequencies. Journal of Applied Geophysics97, 3–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Santos‐AssunçaoS., Perez‐GraciaV., CasellesO., ClapesJ. and SalinasV.2014. Assessment of complex masonry structures with GPR compared to other non‐destructive testing studies. Remote Sensing6, 8220–8237.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. SchmidtA., LinfordP., LinfordN., DavidA., GaffneyC., SarrisA. and FassbinderJ.2015. Guidelines for the Use of Geophysics in Archaeology: Questions to Ask and Points to Consider. European Archaeological Council.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. SchneiderW.1978. Integral formulation for migration in two and three dimensions. Geophysics43, 49–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. UtsiE.2017. Ground Penetrating Radar: Theory and Practice. Butterworth‐Heinemann, Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12046
Loading
/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12046
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Cultural Heritage , GPR prospecting and St. John's Co‐Cathedral
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error