1887
Volume 17, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The Arunachal region that constitutes the easternmost segment of the Himalaya has experienced two great earthquakes in the past. This portion is geologically and seismo‐tectonically unique compared to the other parts of Himalaya. In this study, the ambient seismic noise and earthquake waveforms registered at 34 broadband seismograph stations with a flat frequency response between 120 and 0.02 seconds are analysed to understand the stability and reliability of the horizontal‐to‐vertical spectral ratio method. Also, we use the bootstrapping method to estimate the uncertainty and variations in the horizontal‐to‐vertical spectral ratio in different seasons. Although the predominant frequency does not show any seasonal variation, the amplitudes reveal a slight dependence. The predominant frequencies in the area mainly vary from 1.1 to 7.0 Hz. At a few sites, two peaks well separated in frequency, indicate shallower and deeper structures with impedance contrast. Our results show that the average predominant frequencies are around 3.5 Hz for the undifferentiated granite gneiss, 4.3 Hz for the Bomdila granite gneiss, 2.1 Hz for the Bomdila group of rocks (Paleoproterozoic), 2.8 Hz for the , 2.6 Hz for the Gondwana succession and 1.8 Hz for the Abor formation. The amplification estimated by the site‐to‐reference method varies between 1.5 and 6.2, which is lower than that obtained from the HVSR method. Validation of the results from ambient seismic noise was performed by comparing them with those from the earthquake waveforms and correlation with local geology.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12053
2019-06-23
2020-01-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AcharyaS.K., GhoshS.C., GhoshR.N. and ShahS.C.1975. The Continental Gondwana Group and associated marine sequences of Arunachal Pradesh (NEFA) Eastern Himalaya. Himalayan Geology5, 60–82.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AssimakiD., GazetasG. and KauselE.2005. Effects of local soil conditions on the topographic aggravation of seismic motion: parametric investigation and recorded Field evidence from the 1999 ATHENS earthquake. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America95, 1059–1089.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BardP.Y.1998. Microtremor measurements: a tool for site effect estimation? Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on the Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion (eds K. Irikura, K. Kudo, H. Okada and T. Sasatani), pp. 1251–1279. Balkema, Rotterdam.
  4. Bard, P.‐Y.2004. Effects of surface geology on ground motion: recent results and remaining issues. Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vienna, Austria, August 28 to September 2, 1994, pp. 305–325.
  5. BardP.‐Y. and Riepl‐ThomasJ.P.2000. Wave propagation in complex geological structures and their effects on strong ground motion. In: Wave Motion in Earthquake Engineering (eds E.Kausel and G.Manolis), pp. 39–95. WIT Press, Boston, MA.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BhattacharyyaS. and NandyS.2008. Geology of the Western Arunachal Himalaya in parts of Tawang and West Kameng districts, Arunachal Pradesh. Journal of Geological Society of India72, 199–207.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. BindiD., ParolaiS., SpallarossaD. and CatteneoM.2000. Site effects by H/V ratio: comparison of two different procedures. Journal of Earthquake Engineering4, 97–113.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. BonillaL.F., SteidlJ.H., LindleyG.T., TumarkinA.G. and ArchuletaR.J.1997. Site amplification in the San Fernando Valley, California: variability of site‐effect estimation using the S‐wave code, and H/V methods. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America87, 710–730.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bonnefoy‐ClaudetS., BaizeS., BonillaL.F., Berge‐ThierryC., PastenC.R., CamposJ., et al. 2009. Site effect evaluation in the basin of Santiago de Chile using ambient noise measurements. Geophysical Journal International176, 925–937.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. BorcherdtR.D.1970. Effects of local geology on ground motion near San Francisco Bay. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America6029–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. BourM., FouissacD., DomoniqueP. and MartinC.1989. On the use of microteremor recordings in seismic microzonation. Soil Dynamics of Earthquake Engineering17, 465–474.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. BromirskiP.D. and DuennebierF.K.2002. The near‐coastal microseism spectrum: spatial and temporal wave climate relationships. Journal of Geophysical Research (Solid Earth)107, 5.1–5.20.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. BSSC
    BSSC (2004). NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures (FEMA 450), Part 1 Provisions, 2003 Ed., The Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C. pp. 288.
  14. CastroR.R., MucciarelliM., PacorF. and PetrungaroC.1997. S‐wave site‐response estimates using horizontal‐to‐vertical spectral ratios. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America87, 256–260.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Castro, R.R., Pacor, F., Bindi, D., Franceschina, G. and Luzi, L.2004. Site response of strong motion stations in the Umbria, Central Italy. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America94, 576–590.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. CelebiM.1987. Topographical and geological amplifications determined from strong‐motion and aftershock records of the 3 March 1985 Chile earthquake. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America77, 1147–1157.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. ChatelainJ.L., GuéguenP., GuillierB., FréchetJ., BondouxF., SarraultJ., et al. 2000. CityShark : a user‐friendly instrument dedicated to ambient noise (Microtremor) recording for site and building response studies. Seismological Research Letters71, 698–703.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. DharO.N. and NandargiS.2004. Rainfall distribution over the Arunachal Pradesh Himalayas. Weather59, 155–157.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. DimitriuP., KalogerasI. and ThedulidisN.1999. Evidence of nonlinear site response in horizontal‐to ‐vertical spectral ratio from near‐field earthquakes. Soil Dynamics of Earthquake Engineering18, 423–435.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. EfronB. and TibshiraniR.1986. Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Statistical Science1, 54–77.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. FieldE.H. and JacobK.H.1995. A comparison and test of various site response estimation techniques, including three that are not reference site dependent. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America85, 1127–1143.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. FrankelA.D., CarverD.L. and WilliamsR.A.2002. Nonlinear and linear site response and basin effects in Seattle for the M = 6.8 Nisqually, Washington, earthquake. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America92, 2090–2109.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Friedrich, A., KrugerF. and KlingeK.1998. Ocean generated microseismic noise located with the Grafenberg array. Journal of Seismology2, 47–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. FyenJ.1990. Diurnal and seasonal variations in the microseismic noise levels observed at the NORESS Array. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors63, 252–268.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Gagnepain‐BeyneixJ., LépineJ.C., NercessianA. and HirnA.1995. Experimental study of site effects in the Fort‐de‐France Area (Martinique Island). Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America85, 478–495.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. GansserA.1964. The Geology of the Himalayas. Interscience Publisher.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. GosarA., RošerJ., Šket‐MotnikarB. and ZupančičP.2010. Microtremor study of site effects and soil‐structure resonance in the city of Ljubljana (central Slovenia). Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering8, 571–592.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. GuillierB., AtakanK., ChatelainJ.L., HavskovJ., OhrnbergerM., CaraF., et al. 2008. Influence of instruments on the H/V spectral ratios of ambient vibrations. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering6, 3–31.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. HavskovJ. and OttemöllerL.2008. eds., SEISAN: The earthquake analysis software for Windows, SOLARIS, LINUX and MACKINTOSH Version 8.2. Manual, Department of Earth Science, University of Bergen, Norway.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. HoltW.E., NiJ.F., WallaceT.C. and HainesA.J.1991. The active tectonics of the eastern Himalayan syntaxis and surrounding regions. Journal of Geophysical Research96, 14595–14632.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. HorikeM., ZhaoB. and KawaseH.2001. Comparison of site response characteristics inferred from microtremors and earthquake shear waves. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America91, 1526–1536.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. KollerM.G., ChatelainJ.L., GuillerB., DuvalAm, AtakanK., LacaveC., et al. 2004. Practical user guideline and software for the implementation of the H/V ratio technique on ambient vibrations: measuring conditions, processing method and results interpretation. Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada, August 1–6.
  33. KonnoK. and OhmachiT.1998. Ground‐motion characteristics estimated from spectral ratio between horizontal and vertical components of microtremor. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America88, 228–241.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. KumarM.A. and KumarP.2018. Site characterization in Kangra Valley (NW Himalaya, India) by inversion of H/V spectral ratio from ambient noise measurements and its validation by multichannel analysis of surface waves technique. Near Surface Geophysics16, 314–327.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. LachetC.D. and BardP.Y.1994. Numerical and theoretical investigations on the possibilities and limitations of the Nakamura's technique. Journal of Physics of the Earth42, 377–397.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. LermoJ. and Chavez‐GarciaF.J.1993. Site effect evaluation using spectral ratios with only one station. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America83, 1574–1594.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. LermoJ. and Chavez‐GarciaF.J.1994. Site effect evaluation at Mexico City: dominant period and relative amplification from strong motion and microtremor records. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering13, 413–423.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. LognonneP., ClevedeE. and KanamoriH.1998. Computation of seismograms and atmospheric oscillations by normal mode summation for a spherical Earth model with realistic atmosphere. Geophysical Journal International135, 388–406.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Longuet‐HigginsM.S.1950. A theory of the origin of microseisms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of LondonA 243, 1–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. MathurL.P.1953. Assam Earthquake of 15th August 1950 – A Short Note on Factual Observations, in a Compilation of Papers on the Assam Earthquake of August 15, 1950 (compiled by M.B.Ramachandra Rao). Government of India.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. MénégozM., GalléeH. and JacobiH.W.2013. Precipitation and snow cover in the Himalaya: from reanalysis to regional climate simulations. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17, 3921.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. MucciarelliM.1998. Reliability and applicability of Nakamura's technique using microtremors: an experimental approach. Journal of Earthquake and Engineering2, 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. MucciarelliM. and MonachesiG.1998. A quick survey of local amplifications and their correlation with damage distribution observed during the Umbro‐Marchesan (Italy) earthquake of September 26, 1997. Journal of Earthquake and Engineering2, 325–337.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. MulargiaF. and CastellaroS.2016. HVSR deep mapping tested down to ∼ 1.8 km in Po Plane valley, Italy. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors261, 17–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. NakamuraY.1989. A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using micrometers on the ground surface. Quaternary Report of the Railway Technical Research Institute30, 25–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. NakamuraY.2000. Clear identification of fundamental idea of Nakamura's technique and its applications. Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, 30 January to 4 February 2000, Paper Number 2656.
  47. NandyD.R.1973. Geology and structural lineaments of the Lohit Himalaya (Arunachal Pradesh) and adjoining area, a tectonic interpretation. In: Seminar of Geodynamics of the Himalayan Region (ed. H.K.Gupta), March 5–8, 1973. National Geophysical Research Institute, India.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. NatarajanT. and RajendranK.2017. Site response based on ambient vibrations and earthquake data: a case study from the meizoseismal area of the 2001 Bhuj earthquake. Journal of Seismology21, 335–347.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. NogoshiM. and IgarashiT.1971. On the Amplitude characteristics of microtremors (part 2). Zisin24, 26–40 (in Japanese with English abstract).
    [Google Scholar]
  50. OkadaH.2003. The Microtremor Survey Method. Society of Exploration Geophysicist.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. OldhamR.D.1999. Report in the great earthquake of 12 June 1897. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India29, 1899.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Panou, A.A., TheodulidisN.P., HatzidimitriouP.N., SavvaidisA.S. and PapazaxhosC.B.2005. Reliability of ambient noise horizontal‐to‐vertical spectral ratio in urban environments: the case of Thessaloniki city (northern Greece). Pure and Applied Geophysics162, 891–912.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. ParolaiS., BormannP. and MilkereitC.2001. Assessment of the natural frequency of the sedimentary cover in the cologne area (Germany) using noise measurements. Journal of Earthquake Engineering5, 541–564.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. PedersenH., LeBrunB., HatzfeldD., CampilloM. and BardP.‐Y.1994. Ground motion amplitude across ridges. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America85, 1786–1800.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. PetersonJ.1993. Observations and Modeling of Seismic Background Noise, pp. 93–322. US Department of Interior Geological Survey (Open‐File Report).
    [Google Scholar]
  56. PilzM., ParolaiS., LeytonF., CamposJ. and ZschauJ.2009. A comparison of site response techniques using earthquake data and ambient seismic noise analysis in the large urban areas of Santiago de Chile. Geophysical Journal International178, 713–728.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. RajendranK. and RajendranC.P.2011. Revisiting the earthquake sources in the Himalaya: perspectives on past seismicity. Tectonophysics594, 75–88.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. SahaD.2013. Lesser Himalayan sequences in Eastern Himalaya and their deformation: implications for Paleoproterozoic tectonic activity along the northern margin of India. Geosciences Frontiers4, 289–304.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. SESAME
    SESAME . 2004. SESAME guidelines for the implementation of the H/V spectral ratio technique on ambient vibrations measurements, processing and interpretation SESAME European research project, p. 12. Deliverable D23 (2004).
  60. SinghA.P., AnnamN. and KumarS.2014. Assessment of predominant frequencies using ambient vibration in the Kachchh region of western India: implications for earthquake hazards. Natural Hazards73, 1291–1309.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. SinghA.P., ShuklaA., KumarM.R. and ThakkarM.G.2017. Characterizing surface geology, liquefaction potential, and maximum intensity in the Kachchh Seismic Zone, Western India, through microtremor analysis. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America107, 1277–1292.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Singh, A.K. and Singh, R.K.2012. Petrogenetic evolution of the felsic and mafic volcanic suite in the Siang window of Eastern Himalaya, Northeast India. Geosciences Frontiers3, 613–634.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. SinghS.1993. Geology and tectonics of the eastern syntaxial bend, Arunachal Himalaya. Journal of Himalayan Geology4, 149–163.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. SivaramK., MaheshP. and RaiS.S.2011. Stability assessment and quantitative evaluation of H/V spectral ratios for site response studies in Kumaon Himalaya, India using Ambient Noise recorded by a broadband seismograph network. Pure and Applied Geophysics169, 1801–1820.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. SouriauA., RoulleA. and PonsollesC.2007. Site effects in the city of Lourdes, France, from H/V measurements: implications for seismic‐risk evaluation. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America97, 2118–2136.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. SrivastavaH.N., BansalB.K. and VermaM.2013. The largest earthquake in Himalaya. Journal of Geological Society of India82, 15–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. YamanakaH., DravinskiM. and KagamiH.1993. Continuous measurements of microtremors on sediments and basement in Los Angeles, California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America83, 1595–1609.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12053
Loading
/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12053
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error