Two‐dimensional elastic full‐waveform inversion of Love waves in shallow vertically transversely isotropic media: synthetic reconstruction tests

References

1. AndrusR.D. and StokoeK.H., II. 2000. Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear‐wave velocity. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering126, 1015–1025.
   [Google Scholar]
2. BabuskaV. and CaraM.1991. In: Seismic Anisotropy in the Earth, Vol. 10. Springer.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BergamoP., BoieroD. and SoccoL.V.2012. Retrieving 2D structures from surface‐wave data by means of space‐varying spatial windowing. Geophysics77, EN39–EN51.
   [Google Scholar]
4. BertsekasD.1982. Constrained Optimization and Lagrange Multiplier Methods. Elsevier.
   [Google Scholar]
5. BohlenT.2002. Parallel 3‐D viscoelastic finite difference seismic modelling. Computers & Geosciences28, 887–899.
   [Google Scholar]
6. BohlenT., KuglerS., KleinG. and TheilenF.2004. 1.5D inversion of lateral variation of Scholte‐wave dispersion. Geophysics69, 330–344.
   [Google Scholar]
7. BohlenT., RabbelW., WeissT., SiegesmundS. and PohlM.1999. Recovering shear‐wave anisotropy of the lower crust: the influence of systematic errors on travel‐time inversion. Pure and Applied Geophysics156, 123–138.
   [Google Scholar]
8. BunksC., SaleckF.M., ZaleskiS. and ChaventG.1995. Multiscale seismic waveform inversion. Geophysics60, 1457–1473.
   [Google Scholar]
9. DobryR., BorcherdtR.D., CrouseC.B., IdrissI.M., JoynerW.B., MartinG.R.et al. 2000. New site coefficients and site classification system used in recent building seismic code provisions. Earthquake Spectra16, 41–67.
   [Google Scholar]
10. DokterE., KöhnD., WilkenD., de NilD. and RabbelW.2017. Full waveform inversion of SH‐ and Love‐wave data in near‐surface prospecting. Geophysical Prospecting65, 216–236.
    [Google Scholar]
11. FichtnerA.2011. Full Seismic Waveform Modelling and Inversion. Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
12. ForbrigerT.2003. Inversion of shallow‐seismic wavefields: II. Inferring subsurface properties from wavefield transforms. Geophysical Journal International153, 735–752.
    [Google Scholar]
13. GrayS.H., EtgenJ., DellingerJ. and WhitmoreD.2001. Seismic migration problems and solutions. Geophysics66, 1622–1640.
    [Google Scholar]
14. GrechkaV. and MateevaA.2007. Inversion of P‐wave VSP data for local anisotropy: theory and case study. Geophysics72, D69–D79.
    [Google Scholar]
15. GroosL., SchäferM., ForbrigerT. and BohlenT.2017. Application of a complete workflow for 2D elastic full‐waveform inversion to recorded shallow‐seismic Rayleigh waves. Geophysics82, R109–R117.
    [Google Scholar]
16. HelbigK.1983. Elliptical anisotropy – its significance and meaning. Geophysics48, 825–832.
    [Google Scholar]
17. JeongW., LeeH.‐Y. and MinD.‐J.2012. Full waveform inversion strategy for density in the frequency domain. Geophysical Journal International188, 1221–1242.
    [Google Scholar]
18. KöhnD., HellwigO., de NilD. and RabbelW.2015. Waveform inversion in triclinic anisotropic media – a resolution study. Geophysical Journal International201, 1642–1656.
    [Google Scholar]
19. KöhnD., WilkenD., de NilD., WunderlichT., RabbelW., WertherL.et al. 2019. Comparison of time‐domain SH waveform inversion strategies based on sequential low and bandpass filtered data for improved resolution in near‐surface prospecting. Journal of Applied Geophysics160, 69–83.
    [Google Scholar]
20. KoulakovI., JakovlevA. and LuehrB.G.2009. Anisotropic structure beneath central Java from local earthquake tomography. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems10, 1–31.
    [Google Scholar]
21. LiuQ. and TrompJ.2006. Finite‐frequency kernels based on adjoint methods. Geophysics96, 2383–2397.
    [Google Scholar]
22. MiB., XiaJ., ShenC., WangL., HuY. and ChengF.2017. Horizontal resolution of multichannel analysis of surface waves. Geophysics82, EN51–EN66.
    [Google Scholar]
23. NocedalJ. and WrightS.J.2006. Numerical optimization. Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
24. OhJ.‐W. and AlkhalifahT.2016. Elastic orthorhombic anisotropic parameter inversion: an analysis of parameterization. Geophysics81, C279–C293.
    [Google Scholar]
25. PanY., GaoL. and BohlenT.2018. Time‐domain full‐waveform inversion of Rayleigh and Love waves in presence of free‐surface topography. Journal of Applied Geophysics152, 77–85.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Pan, Y., Gao, L. and Bohlen, T.2019. High‐resolution characterization of near‐surface structures by surface‐wave inversions: from dispersion curve to full waveform. Surveys in Geophysics40, 167–195.
    [Google Scholar]
27. PanY., SchanengS., SteinwegT. and BohlenT.2018. Estimating S‐wave velocities from 3D 9‐component shallow seismic data using local Rayleigh‐wave dispersion curves – a field study. Journal of Applied Geophysics159, 532–39.
    [Google Scholar]
28. PanY., XiaJ., XuY., GaoL. and XuZ.2016. Love‐wave waveform inversion in time domain for shallow shear‐wave velocity. Geophysics81, R1–R14.
    [Google Scholar]
29. ParkC.B., MillerR.D. and XiaJ.1999. Multichannel analysis of surface waves. Geophysics64, 800–808.
    [Google Scholar]
30. PlessixR.‐E.2006. A review of the adjoint‐state method for computing the gradient of a functional with geophysical applications. Geophysical Journal International167, 495–503.
    [Google Scholar]
31. PrieuxV., BrossierR., GholamiY., OpertoS., VirieuxJ., BarkvedO.I.et al. 2011. On the footprint of anisotropy on isotropic full waveform inversion: the Valhall case study. Geophysical Journal International187, 1495–1515.
    [Google Scholar]
32. PrieuxV., BrossierR., OpertoS. and VirieuxJ.2013. Multiparameter full waveform inversion of multicomponent ocean‐bottom‐cable data from the Valhall field. Part 1: imaging compressional wave speed, density and attenuation. Geophysical Journal International194, 1640–1664.
    [Google Scholar]
33. SearsT.J., BartonP.J. and SinghS.C.2010. Elastic full waveform inversion of multicomponent ocean‐bottom cable seismic data: application to Alba Field, U. K. North Sea. Geophysics75, R109–R119.
    [Google Scholar]
34. SoccoL.V., FotiS. and BoieroD.2010. Surface‐wave analysis for building near‐surface velocity models – established approaches and new perspectives. Geophysical Journal International75, 75A83–75A102.
    [Google Scholar]
35. TarantolaA.1984. Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation. Geophysics49, 1259–1266.
    [Google Scholar]
36. ThomsenL.1986. Weak elastic anisotropy. Geophysics51, 1954–1966.
    [Google Scholar]
37. TranK.T., McVayM., FaraoneM. and HorhotaD.2013. Sinkhole detection using 2D full seismic waveform tomography. Geophysics78, R175–R183.
    [Google Scholar]
38. TsvankinI., GaiserJ., GrechkaV., van der BaanM. and ThomsenL.2010. Seismic anisotropy in exploration and reservoir characterization: an overview. Geophysics75, 75A15–75A29.
    [Google Scholar]
39. van der BaanM. and KendallJ.M.2002. Estimating anisotropy parameters and traveltimes in the τ‐ p domain. Geophysics67, 1076–1086.
    [Google Scholar]
40. VerwestB.J.1989. Seismic migration in elliptically anisotropic media. Geophysical Prospecting37, 149–166.
    [Google Scholar]
41. VirieuxJ., AsnaashariA., BrossierR., MétivierL., RibodettiA. and ZhouW.2017. An introduction to full waveform inversion. In: Encyclopedia of Exploration Geophysics (eds. V.Grechka and K.Wapenaar), pp. R1-1–R1-40.
    [Google Scholar]
42. WarnerM., RatcliffeA., NangooT., MorganJ., UmplebyA., ShahN.et al. 2013. Anisotropic 3D full‐waveform inversion. Geophysical Prospecting78, R59–R80.
    [Google Scholar]
43. WillsC.J.2000. A site‐conditions map for California based on geology and shear‐wave velocity. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America90, S187–S208.
    [Google Scholar]
44. WittkampF., AthanasopoulosA. and BohlenT.2009. Individual and joint 2‐D elastic full‐waveform inversion of Rayleigh and Love waves. Geophysical Journal International216, 350–364.
    [Google Scholar]
45. XiaJ.2014. Estimation of near‐surface shear‐wave velocities and quality factors using multichannel analysis of surface‐wave methods. Journal of Applied Geophysics103, 140–151.
    [Google Scholar]