1887
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

We developed a drone‐borne electromagnetic survey system using a commercial multi‐frequency electromagnetic sensor equipped with a GPS receiver, a WiFi serial transceiver, and an ultrasonic distance sensor to measure the height of the electromagnetic sensor above the ground surface. The electromagnetic sensor was suspended from a drone with ropes. The distance between the drone and the electromagnetic sensor was adjusted to minimize the influence of electromagnetic noise generated by the drone, and to stabilize the electromagnetic sensor during flight. The system was tested at two experimental sites. The first site consisted of two buried vehicles to simulate a landslide. We assumed a scenario in which the search for the buried vehicles was urgent and accessibility to the area was limited. The second site consisted of wet and dry agricultural fields to test resistivity mapping. In the first test, we used the in‐phase component of the measured data to locate the vehicles. The shallower vehicle was identified clearly, while the deeper vehicle was located successfully, albeit less easily. In the second test, the quadrature component was used for one‐dimensional inversion after data processing, which included data smoothing, resampling and bias noise correction. The bias noise was measured while hovering the drone at a high altitude to negate the influence of ground conductivity. The results showed that the resistivity distributions could be mapped at some depths by using a five‐frequency‐processed quadrature component, and clearly showed the difference between the wet and dry fields. The crucial parameter in the evaluations of these targets was the height of the electromagnetic sensor above the ground surface, which was measured continuously during flight. The results demonstrated the potential of the survey system to search for buried metal objects and for shallow subsurface resistivity mapping over relatively large areas.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12189
2022-01-14
2022-01-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/nsg/20/1/nsg12189.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12189&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Akaike, H. (1980) Likelihood and the Bayes procedure. In: Bernardo,J. M., De Groot,M. H., Lindley,D. V. & Smith,A. F. M. (Eds.) Bayesian statistics. Cambridge: University Press, pp. 143–166.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bruschini, C. (2002) A multidisciplinary analysis of frequency domain metal detectors for humanitarian demining, PhD Thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Davis, A.C., Macnae, J. & Robb, T. (2006) Pendulum motion in airborne HEM systems. Exploration Geophysics, 37, 355–362.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Doll, W.E., Nyquist, J.E., Beard, L.P. & Gamey, T.J. (2000) Airborne geophysical surveying for hazardous waste site characterization on the Oak Ridge Reservation, Tennessee. Geophysics, 65, 1372–1387.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Doolittle, J.A. (2012) Noninvasive geophysical methods used in soil science. In: Huang, P.M., Li,Y. & Sumner, M.E. (Eds.) Handbook of soil sciences, properties and progresses, 2nd edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 39–1–39–31.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Enokizono, M., Sakurada, A., Hasegawa, K. & Watanabe, F. (2007) Developing a system for detecting vehicles buried underground by a disaster, Part 1: determining suitable geophysical prospecting techniques. Proceedings of the 117th Society of Exploration Geophysicists of Japan Conference, pp. 223–226. (In Japanese with English abstract.)
  7. Eröss, R., Tezkan, B., Stoll, J.B. & Bergers, R. (2017) Interpretation of very low frequency measurements carried out with an unmanned aerial system by 2D conductivity models. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 22, 83–94.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Everett, M.E. (2013) Near‐surface applied geophysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Huang, H. (2005) Depth of investigation for small broadband electromagnetic sensors. Geophysics, 70, G135–G142.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hunkeler, P.A., Hendricks, S., Hoppmann, M., Paul, S. & Gerdes, R. (2015) Towards an estimation of sub‐sea‐ice platelet‐layer volume with multi‐frequency electromagnetic induction sounding. Annals of Glaciology, 56(69), 137–146.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Johmori, A., Johmori, A., Kondou, T., Yuuki, Y. & Kawase, M. (2018) Development of grounded electrical‐source airborne transient electromagnetics (GREATEM) system using a multicopter. Proceedings of the 138th Society of Exploration Geophysicists of Japan Conference, Tokyo, pp. 120–123. (In Japanese with English abstract.)
  12. Matsunaga, K., Matsuda, R., Matsuo, T. & Watanabe, I. (2019) The 2019 Kumamoto Earthquakes landslide disasters and response. International Journal of Erosion Control Engineering, 11, 131–137.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Minsley, B., Smith, B.D., Hammack, R., Sams, J.I. & Veloski, G. (2012) Calibration and filtering strategies for frequency domain electromagnetic data. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 80, 56–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Mitsuhata, Y., Uchida, T., Matsuo, K., Marui, A. & Kusunose, K. (2006) Various‐scale electromagnetic investigations of high‐salinity zones in a coastal plain. Geophysics, 71, B167–B173.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Mitsuhata, Y. & Imasato, T. (2009) On‐site bias noise correction in multifrequency slingram‐type electromagnetic induction measurements. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 14, 179–188.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Mitsuhata, Y., Ando, D., Imasato, T. & Takagi, K. (2014) Characterization of organic‐contaminated ground by a combination of electromagnetic mapping and direct‐push in situ measurement. Near Surface Geophysics, 12, 613–621.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Okuma, S., Ueda, T., Nakatsuka, T., Mitsuhata, Y., Jinguuji, M. & Uchida, T. (2013) Aeromagnetic anomalies in the inundation area by the tsunami of the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake, northeast Japan. Proceedings of the 11th SEGJ International Symposium. Tulsa, OK: The Society of Exploration Geophysicists of Japan, pp. 131–133.
  18. Qi, Z., Li, X., Li, H., Zhang, Y. & Zhou, J. (2108) Drone‐borne transient electromagnetic system and its application in UXO detection. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2018, pp. 2776–2780.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Reynolds, J.M. (2011) An introduction to applied and environmental geophysics, 2nd edition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Röttger, B., Kirsch, R., Friborg, R., Scheer, W., Thomsen, S. & Voss, W. (2005) Multifrequency airborne EM surveys – a tool for aquifer vulnerability mapping. In: Butler, D.K. (Ed.) Near‐surface geophysics, Society of Exploration Geophysicists. Tulsa, OK: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp. 643–651.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Sharma, P.V. (1997) Environmental and engineering geophysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Sidle, R.C., Kamai, T. & Trandafir, A.C. (2005) Evaluating landslide damage during the 2004 Chuetsu Earthquake, Niigata, Japan. EOS, 86, 133–136.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Siemon, B., Stuntebeck, C., Sengpiel, K.‐P., Röttger, B., Rehli, H.‐J. & Eberle, D.G. (2002) Investigation of hazardous waste sites and their environment using the BGR helicopter‐borne geophysical system. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 7, 169–181.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Stoll, J.B. (2013) Unmanned aircraft systems for rapid near surface geophysical measurements. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XL‐1/W2, 391–394.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Van Der Veeke, S., Koomans, R.L., Van Egmond, F.M. & Limburg, J. (2018) A drone as platform for airborne gamma‐ray surveys to characterize soil and monitor contaminations. 24th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Potro, Portugal.
  26. Won, I.J., Keiswetter, D.A., Fields, G.R.A. & Sutton, L.C. (1996) GEM‐2: a new multifrequency electromagnetic sensor. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 1, 129–137.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12189
Loading
/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12189
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Airborne EM , Geohazards , Hydrogeophysics , Near‐surface and Resistivity
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error