Choosing optimal model parameterization for improving the accuracy of refraction seismic tomography

References

1. Arciniega‐CeballosA., Hernandez‐QuinteroE., Cabral‐CanoE., Morett‐AlatorreL., Diaz‐MolinaO., Soler‐ArechaldeA. and Chavez‐SeguraR. (2009) Shallow geophysical survey at the archaeological site of San Miguel Tocuila, Basin of Mexico. Journal of Archaeological Science, 36(6), 1199–1205.
   [Google Scholar]
2. CercatoM. and De DonnoG. (2018) Focusing on soil‐foundation heterogeneity through high‐resolution electrical and seismic tomography. Near Surface Geophysics, 16(1), 67–78.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Di FioreV., CavuotoG., TaralloD., PunzoM. and EvangelistaL. (2016) Multichannel analysis of surface waves and down‐hole tests in the archeological “Palatine Hill” area (Rome, Italy): evaluation and influence of 2D effects on the shear wave velocity. Surveys in Geophysics, 37(3), 625–642.
   [Google Scholar]
4. GoryainovN.N. (1992) Application of Seismoacoustic Methods in Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology. Nedra, 261 p. (in Russian)
   [Google Scholar]
5. HagedoornJ.G. (1959) The plus-minus method of interpreting seismic refraction sections. Geophysical prospecting, 7(2), 158–182. https://www.earthdoc.org/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1964.tb01888.x.
   [Google Scholar]
6. KoulakovI., StupinaT. and KoppH. (2010) Creating realistic models based on combined forward modeling and tomographic inversion of seismic profiling data. Geophysics, 75(3), B115–B136.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Lanz, E. and Maurer, H. and Green, A.G. (1998) Refraction tomography over a buried waste disposal site. Geophysics, 63(4), 1414–1433.
   [Google Scholar]
8. LevequeJ.‐J., RiveraL. and WittlingerG. (1993) On the Use of the Checker‐board test to assess the resolution of tomographic inversions. Geophysical Journal International, 115(1), 313–318. https://academic.oup.com/gji/article-abstract/115/1/313/604170.
   [Google Scholar]
9. LuoY., ModrakR. and TrompJ. (2015) Strategies in adjoint tomography. Handbook of Geomathematics, 2nd edition. Springer, pp. 1943–2001.
   [Google Scholar]
10. MariesG., AhokangasE., MakinenJ., PasanenA. and MalehmirA. (2016) Interlobate esker architecture and related hydrogeological features derived from a combination of high‐resolution reflection seismic and refraction tomography, Virttaankangas, southwest Finland. Hydrogeology Journal, 25, 829–845.
    [Google Scholar]
11. NikitinA.A., SerdyukovA.S. and DuchkovA.A. (2018) Cache‐efficient parallel eikonal solver for multicore CPUs. Computational Geosciences, 22(3), 775–787.
    [Google Scholar]
12. NoletG. (ed.) (2012) Seismic Tomography: With Applications in Global Seismology and Exploration Geophysics, Vol. 5. Springer Science & Business Media, 385 p.
    [Google Scholar]
13. NoletG. (1987) Seismic wave propagation and seismic tomography. In Seismic Tomography. Springer, pp. 1–23.
    [Google Scholar]
14. PalmerD. (2015) Is accuracy more important than precision in near‐surface refraction seismology?. Near Surface Geophysics, 13(1), 1–18.
    [Google Scholar]
15. PaigeC. and SaundersM. (1982) LSQR: An algorithm for sparse linear equations and sparse linear least squares. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 8(1), 43–71. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/355984.355989.
    [Google Scholar]
16. ParkC.B., MillerR.D. and XiaJ. (1999) Multichannel analysis of surface waves. Geophysics, 64(3), 800–808. https://library.seg.org/doi/abs/10.1190/1.1444590.
    [Google Scholar]
17. RawlinsonN. and SambridgeM. (2003) Seismic traveltime tomography of the crust and lithosphere. Advances in Geophysics, 46, 81–199.
    [Google Scholar]
18. SchichtT., LindnerU., HecknerJ., StrobelG. and RappsilberI. (2007) Seismic tomography on the castle hill in Quedlinburg. Near Surface Geophysics, 5(5), 339–343.
    [Google Scholar]
19. SunR., KaslilarA. and JuhlinC. (2020) Reprocessing of high‐resolution seismic data for imaging of shallow groundwater resources in glacial deposits, SE Sweden. Near Surface Geophysics, 18(5), 545–559.
    [Google Scholar]
20. SuvorovV.D., MishenkinaZ.M., PetrickG.V., SheludkoI.F., SeleznevV.S. and SolovyovV.M. (2002) Structure of the crust in the Baikal rift zone and adjacent areas from deep seismic sounding data. Tectonophysics, 351(1‐2), 61–74.
    [Google Scholar]
21. TikhotskiiS.A., FokinI.V. and SchurD.Y. (2011) Traveltime seismic tomography with adaptive wavelet parameterization. Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth, 47(4), 326–344.
    [Google Scholar]
22. TrabiB. (2018) Comparison of Slowness vs. Velocity Perturbations in Bayesian Seismic Inversion. Leoben: Leoben University, 75 p.
    [Google Scholar]
23. TongP., YangD. and HuangX. (2019) Multiple‐grid model parametrization for seismic tomography with application to the San Jacinto fault zone. Geophysical Journal International, 218(1), 200–223.
    [Google Scholar]
24. YilmazÖ. (2015) Engineering Seismology with Applications to Geotechnical Engineering. SEG, 964 p.
    [Google Scholar]
25. VargaL., BalázsP. and NagyA. (2015) Discrete tomographic reconstruction via adaptive weighting of gradient descents. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging & Visualization, 3(2), 101–109.
    [Google Scholar]
26. ZeltC.A. (2011) Traveltime tomography using controlled‐source seismic data. Encyclopedia of Solid Earth Geophysics, 1453–1473.
    [Google Scholar]
27. ZeltC.A. and SmithR.B. (1992) Seismic traveltime inversion for 2‐D crustal velocity structure. Geophysical Journal International, 108(1), 16–34.
    [Google Scholar]
28. ZeltC.A., SainK., NaumenkoJ.V. and SawyerD.S. (2003) Assessment of crustal velocity models using seismic refraction and reflection tomography. Geophysical Journal International, 153(3), 609–626.
    [Google Scholar]
29. ZhaoH.A. (2005) Fast sweeping method for eikonal equations. Mathematics of Computation, 74(250), 603–627.
    [Google Scholar]