Preferential flow between rivers and aquifers in alluvial floodplains: A key to modelling and sustainably managing shallow groundwater resources

References

1. Bosch, D.D., Sheridan, J.M. & Lowrance, R.R. (1996) Hydraulic gradients and flow rates of a shallow coastal plain aquifer in a forested riparian buffer. Transactions of the ASABE, 39(3), 865–871.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bridge, J.S. (2009) Rivers and floodplains: forms, processes, and sedimentary record. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Camporeale, C., Perucca, E. & Ridolfi, L. (2008) Significance of cutoff in meandering river dynamics. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 113, F01001. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JF000694
   [Google Scholar]
4. Clark, B.R., Hart, R.M. & Gurdak, J.J., (2011) Groundwater availability of the Mississippi embayment. In: U.S. Geological Survey professional paper 1785.
5. Dafny, E. & Silburn, D.M. (2014) The hydrogeology of the Condamine River Alluvial Aquifer, Australia: a critical assessment. Hydrogeology Journal, 22(3), 705–727.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Davis, R.A. (2003) Coastal geology. In: Meyers, R.A. (Ed.) Encyclopedia of physical science and technology, 3rd edition, New York: Academic Press, pp. 123–153.
   [Google Scholar]
7. De Carlo, L., Perkins, K. & Caputo, M.C. (2021) Evidence of preferential flow activation in the vadose zone via geophysical monitoring. Sensors, 21(4), 1358.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Everett, M. (2013) Near‐surface applied geophysics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Furman, A., Ferré, T.P.A. & Warrick, A.W. (2003) A sensitivity analysis of electrical resistivity tomography array types using analytical element modeling. Vadose Zone Journal, 2(3), 416–423.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Ghazavi, R., Thomas, Z., Hamon, Y. & Merot, P. (2011) Soil water movement under a bottomland hedgerow during contrasting meteorological conditions. Hydrological Processes, 25(9), 1431–1442.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Gleeson, T., Cuthbert, M., Ferguson, G. & Perrone, D. (2020) Global groundwater sustainability, resources, and systems in the anthropocene. In: Annual review of earth and planetary sciences, Vol. 48, Palo Alto: Annual Reviews, pp. 431–463.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Griebler, C. & Avramov, M. (2015) Groundwater ecosystem services: a review. Freshwater Science, 34(1), 355–367.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hajek, E.A., Heller, P.L. & Sheets, B.A. (2010) Significance of channel‐belt clustering in alluvial basins. Geology, 38(6), 535–538.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Jackobsen, J.C., Gluud, C., Wetterslev, J. & Winkel, P. (2017) When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials – a practical guide with flowcharts. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17(162).
    [Google Scholar]
15. Jerolmack, D.J. & Paola, C. (2007) Complexity in a cellular model of river avulsion. Geomorphology, Special Issue, 91(3–4), 259–270.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Jonsson, H. & Vonnegut, B. (1991) Apparatus for measurements of the electrical-conductivity of rainwater with high‐resolution in space and time. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 30(8), 1220–1227.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Klove, B., Ala‐Aho, P., Bertrand, G., Gurdak, J.J., Kupfersberger, H., Kvaerner, J., et al. (2014) Climate change impacts on groundwater and dependent ecosystems. Journal of Hydrology, 518, 250–266.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Loke, M.H. (1999) Electrical imaging surveys for environmental and engineering studies: a practical guide to 2‐D and 3‐D surveys. https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.aarhusgeosoftware.dk__;!!KwNVnqRv!RiVLnEsgJgJsUkGy2ApB0CccEj6nd7F9greAKlO7_fyI1HCFwhZG25k35X_9VcDmDSgqd9tcKrKPGA$
19. Lu, N. & Likos, W.J. (2004) Rate of capillary rise in soil. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 130(6), 646–650.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Macdonald, D.M., Dixon, A.J. & Gooddy, D.C. (2018) Water and nitrate exchange between a managed river and peri‐urban floodplain aquifer: quantification and management implications. Ecological Engineering, 123, 226–237.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Martin, J.M., Everett, M.E. & Knappett, P.S.K. (2021) Coupling hydrogeophysics with hydrodynamic modelling to infer subsurface hydraulic architecture of an alluvial floodplain. Near Surface Geophysics, 19(3), 335–352.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Martinius, A.W. (2000) Labyrinthine facies architecture of the Tortola fluvial system and controls on deposition (Late Oligocene – Early Miocene, Loranca Basin, Spain). Journal of Sedimentary Rock, 70(4), 850–867.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Menichino, G.T. & Hester, E.T. (2015) The effect of macropores on bi‐directional hydrologic exchange between a stream channel and riparian groundwater. Journal of Hydrology, 529, 830–842.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Nanson, G.C. & Croke, J.C. (1992) A genetic classification of floodplains. Geomorphology, 4(6), 459–486.
    [Google Scholar]
25. National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) . (2021) Normals Annual/Seasonal Station Details for GHCND:USW00003904. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo‐web/datasets/NORMAL_ANN/stations/GHCND:USW00003904/detail
26. Rhodes, K.A., Proffitt, T., Rowley, T., Knappett, P.S.K., Montiel, D., Dimova, N., et al. (2017) The importance of bank storage in supplying baseflow to rivers flowing through compartmentalized, alluvial aquifers. Water Resources Research, 53(12), 10539–10557.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Scheidegger, J.M., Jackson, C.R., Muddu, S., Tomer, S.K. & Filgueira, R. (2021) Integration of 2D lateral groundwater flow into the variable infiltration capacity (VIC) model and effects on simulated fluxes for different grid resolutions and aquifer diffusivities. Water, 13(5), 663.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Sedaghatdoost, A., Mohanty, B. & Huang, Y. (2019) The effect of heterogeneities in soil physical and chemical properties on redox biogeochemistry in subsurface soils. American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting 2019, Expanded Abstracts, San Francisco, United States, B33E‐08.
29. Šimůlek, J., Šejna, M. & van Genuchten, M.T. (2012) The HYDRUS software package for simulating two‐ and three‐dimensional movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes variably saturated porous media – technical manual (version 2.0). Prague, Czech Republic: PC Progress.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) . (2017) Groundwater availability model for the Brazos River Alluvium. Austin: INTERA Inc. https://www.twdb.texas.gov/groundwater/models/gam/bzrv/bzrv.asp
    [Google Scholar]
31. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) . (2014) Soil survey of Burleson county. Texas: USDA. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_MANUSCRIPTS/texas/TX051/0/Burleson.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
32. United States Geological Survey (USGS) . (2021) Brazos River at SH‐21 near Bryan, Texas. https://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/uv?site_no=08108700
33. Xiang, X., Li, Q., Khan, S. & Khalaf, O.I. (2021) Urban water resource management for sustainable environment planning using artificial intelligence techniques. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 86, 106515.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Zonge, K., Wynn, J. & Urquhart, S. (2005) Resistivity, induced polarization, and complex resistivity. In: Butler, D.K. (Ed.) Near surface geophysics. Tulsa, OK: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp. 265–300.
    [Google Scholar]