oa Geomechanical parameters assessment and geological characterization using fuzzy C means clustering of electrical resistivity and seismic data

References

1. Benjumea, B., Gabàs, A., Macau, A., Ledo, J., Bellmunt, F., Figueras, S. et al. (2021) Undercover karst imaging using a fuzzy c‐means data clustering approach (Costa Brava, NE Spain). Engineering Geology, 293, 106327.
   [Google Scholar]
2. García‐Yeguas, A., Ledo, J., Piña‐Varas, P., Prudencio, J., Queralt, P., Marcuello, A. et al. (2017) A 3D joint interpretation of magnetotelluric and seismic tomographic models: the case of the volcanic island of Tenerife. Computers & Geosciences, 109, 95–105.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Holmes, J., Sivakumar, V., Wilkinson, P., Huntley, D., Chambers, J. & Donohue, S. (2021). Assessing landslide risk using near‐surface geophysics for long‐term monitoring of an unstable slope affecting transport infrastructure in Western Canada. In Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2021 (pp. 160–160). Houston, TX: Society of Exploration Geophysicists and Environment and Engineering Geophysical Society.
   [Google Scholar]
4. ICGC (2015) Estudi geològic de les causes de les patologies existents en els habitatges de les àrees de Can Castanyer i de Riells, del municipi de Bigues I Riells. AP_0041_15. Barcelona, Spain: Generalitat de Catalunya. Informes tècnics Institut Cartogràfic i Geològic de Catalunya.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Konstantaki, L.A., Carpentier, S., Garofalo, F., Bergamo, P. & Socco, L.V. (2013) Determining hydrological and soil mechanical parameters from multichannel surface‐wave analysis across the Alpine Fault at Inchbonnie, New Zealand. Near Surface Geophysics, 11(4), 435–448.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Loke, M.H. (2020) Tutorial: 2‐D and 3‐D electrical imaging surveys. Geotomo software, Malaysia.
7. Neducza, B. (2007) Stacking of surface waves. Geophysics, 72(2), V51–V58, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2431635
   [Google Scholar]
8. Niederleithinger, E., Abraham, O. & Mooney, M. (2015) Geophysical methods in civil engineering: overview and new concepts. In International Symposium Non‐Destructive Testing in Civil Engineering (NDT‐CE) (NDTCE 2015), 15–17 September 2015, Berlin, Germany. e‐Journal of Nondestructive Testing, 20(11), 1435–4934.
   [Google Scholar]
9. O'Neill, A., Dentith, M. & List, R. (2003) Full‐waveform P‐SV reflectivity inversion of surface waves for shallow engineering applications. Exploration Geophysics, 34, 158–173, https://doi.org/10.1071/EG03158.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Paasche, H., Tronicke, J., Holliger, K., Green, A.G. & Maurer, H. (2006) Integration of diverse physical‐property models: subsurface zonation and petrophysical parameter estimation based on fuzzy c‐means cluster analyses. Geophysics, 71(3), H33–H44.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Pasquet, S. & Bodet, L. (2017) SWIP: an integrated workflow for surface‐wave dispersion inversion and profiling. Geophysics, 82(6), WB47–WB61.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Pasquet, S., Bodet, L., Longuevergne, L., Dhemaied, A., Camerlynck, C., Rejiba, F. et al. (2015) 2D characterization of near‐surface VP/VS: Surface‐wave dispersion inversion versus refraction tomography. Near Surface Geophysics, 13(4), 315–332.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Pegah, E. & Liu, H. (2016) Application of near‐surface seismic refraction tomography and multichannel analysis of surface waves for geotechnical site characterizations: a case study. Engineering Geology, 208, 100–113.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Samarasinghe, S. (2016) Neural networks for applied sciences and engineering: From fundamentals to complex pattern recognition. Farnham, UK: Auerbach Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Svensson, M. & Friberg, O. (2018, October) Communication of geophysics in underground infrastructure projects. In Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2018 (pp. 361–366). Society of Exploration Geophysicists and Environment and Engineering Geophysical Society.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Vagnon, F., Comina, C. & Arato, A. (2022) Evaluation of different methods for deriving geotechnical parameters from electric and seismic streamer data. Engineering Geology, 303, 106670.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Whatelet, M. (2008) An improved neighborhood algorithm: Parameter conditions and dynamic scaling. Geophysical Research Letters, 35(9), L09301.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Zhang, J.J. & Bentley, L.R. (2005) Factors determining Poisson's ratio. CREWES Research Report, 17(1), 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]