Deep learning inversion method of tunnel resistivity synthetic data based on modelling data

References

1. Aleardi, M., Vinciguerra, A. & Hojat, A. (2021) A convolutional neural network approach to electrical resistivity tomography. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 193, 104434.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Araya‐Polo, M., Jennings, J., Adler, A. & Dahlke, T. (2018) Deep‐learning tomography. The Leading Edge, 37(1), 58–66.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Chambers, J., Wilkinson, P., Wardrop, D., Hameed, A., Hill, I., Jeffrey, C., Loke, M., Meldrum, P., Kuras, O., Cave, M. & Gunn, D. (2012) Bedrock detection beneath river terrace deposits using three‐dimensional electrical resistivity tomography. Geomorphology, 177–178, 17–25.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Ching, T., Himmelstein, D.S., Beaulieu‐Jones, B.K., Kalinin, A.A., Do, B.T., Way, G.P., Ferrero, E., Agapow, P.‐M., Zietz, M., Hoffman, M.M., et al. (2018) Opportunities and obstacles for deep learning in biology and medicine. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 15(141), 20170387.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Di, H., Li, Z., Maniar, H. & Abubakar, A. (2020) Seismic stratigraphy interpretation by deep convolutional neural networks: a semisupervised workflow. Geophysics, 85(4), WA77–WA86.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Di, H., Wang, Z. & AlRegib, G. (2018) Deep convolutional neural networks for seismic salt‐body delineation. Paper presented at AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition, Salt Lake City, UT, May 20–23, 2018.
7. Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T. & Malik, J. (2014) Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, (pp. 580–587). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
8. Hu, Y., Wei, X., Wu, X., Sun, J., Chen, J., Chen, J. & Huang, Y. (2021) Deep learning‐enhanced multiphysics joint inversion. In First International meeting for applied geoscience & energy. Houston, TX: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp. 1721–1725.
9. Jiang, P., Gu, F., Wang, Y., Tu, C. & Chen, B. (2018) Difnet: Semantic segmentation by diffusion networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 31, 1637–1646.
   [Google Scholar]
10. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. & Hinton, G. (2015) Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Legault, J., Carriere, D. & Petrie, L. (2008) Synthetic model testing and distributed acquisition dc resistivity results over an unconformity uranium target from the Athabasca Basin, Northern Saskatchewan. The Leading Edge, 27(1), 46–51.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Li, S., Liu, B., Ren, Y., Chen, Y., Yang, S., Wang, Y. & Jiang, P. (2019) Deep‐learning inversion of seismic data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 58(3), 2135–2149.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Li, S., Liu, B., Xu, X., Nie, L., Liu, Z., Song, J., Sun, H., Chen, L. & Fan, K. (2017) An overview of ahead geological prospecting in tunneling. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 63, 69–94.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Li, S., Nie, L. & Liu, B. (2018) The practice of forward prospecting of adverse geology applied to hard rock TBM tunnel construction: the case of the Songhua River Water Conveyance Project in the middle of Jilin Province. Engineering, 4(1), 131–137.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Li, S., Nie, L., Liu, B., Tian, M., Wang, C., Song, J., Liu, Z. & Wang, S. (2015) Advanced detection and physical model test based on multi‐electrode sources array resistivity method in tunnel. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 58(4), 1434–1446.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Li, Y. & Oldenburg, D.W. (1994) Inversion of 3‐D DC resistivity data using an approximate inverse mapping. Geophysical Journal International, 116(3), 527–537.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Litjens, G., Kooi, T., Bejnordi, B.E., Setio, A.A.A., Ciompi, F., Ghafoorian, M., Van Der Laak, J.A., Van Ginneken, B. & Sánchez, C.I. (2017) A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. Medical Image Analysis, 42, 60–88.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Liu, B., Guo, Q., Li, S., Liu, B., Ren, Y., Pang, Y., Guo, X., Liu, L. & Jiang, P. (2020) Deep learning inversion of electrical resistivity data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 58(8), 5715–5728.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Liu, B., Guo, Q., Wang, K., Pang, Y., Nie, L. & Jiang, P. (2021) Adaptive convolution neural networks for electrical resistivity inversion. IEEE Sensors Journal, 21(2), 2055–2066.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Liu, B., Li, S., Nie, L., Wang, J., Zhang, Q., et al. (2012) 3D resistivity inversion using an improved genetic algorithm based on control method of mutation direction. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 87, 1–8.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Loke, M. & Barker, R. (1995) Improvements to the Zohdy method for the inversion of resistivity sounding and pseudosection data. Computers & Geosciences, 21(2), 321–332.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Luo, W., Li, Y., Urtasun, R. & Zemel, R. (2016) Understanding the effective receptive field in deep convolutional neural networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29. 4898–4906.
23. Simonyan, K. & Zisserman, A. (2014) Very deep convolutional networks for large‐scale image recognition. Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1409.1556
24. Vu, M. & Jardani, A. (2021) Convolutional neural networks with Segnet architecture applied to three‐dimensional tomography of subsurface electrical resistivity: CNN‐3D‐ERT. Geophysical Journal International, 225(2), 1319–1331.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Wei, B., Pan, B., Yin, Q., Tian, C. & Guo, X. (2020) Identification of image logging data based on conditional generation adversarial network. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 59(2), 295–302.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Yu, F. & Koltun, V. (2016) Multi‐scale context aggregation by dilated convolutions. In 4th International Conference on Learning Representations, (ICLR 2016), San Juan, Puerto Rico, May 2–4, 2016.