1887
Volume 21, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

Abstract

This paper presents a successful application of the mise‐à‐la‐masse (MALM) or applied potential method in association with induced polarization (IP). MALM is known, since 1920, to be able to delimit electrically conductive massive mineralization. The method is used at the point where a drill hole intercepts a massive, mineralized body, to estimate its extent and shape. It is thus used as a complementary mineral exploration tool. IP is normally used in conjunction with resistivity. However, the acquisition of IP data together with the MALM method is rarely found in the literature. This survey shows that it is possible to successfully detect and delimit areas of disseminated sulphides using MALM with IP. In this paper, the MALM method is presented and discussed in detail. A short description of the IP method is also provided. Data are from the Camaquã Project (Caçapava do Sul, RS, Brazil) and the Santa Maria (lead, zinc and associated silver) deposit, 5 km south of Caçapava do Sul. In a well that intercepted a massive mineralization (borehole 8011) with electrical continuity, ∆ measurements delineated the extent, shape and orientation (NS) of a conductive sulphide body. Mineralization intercepted by other two wells (8011 and 8103) did not present enough electrical continuity to exhibit potential contours that could be associated to massive sulphides; it was, however, successfully detected by IP.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12254
2023-07-17
2026-02-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Akesson, S. (2015) The application of resistivity and IP measurements as investigation tools at contaminated sites. vol. 442. Master's thesis. Dissertations in Geology at Lund University, 82 p.
  2. Badi, W.R.S. (1983) Mineralização de chumbo e zinco em arenitos do Distrito de Camaquã, RS. Curso de Pós‐Graduação em Geociências. Dissertação de Mestrado. Porto Alegre: UFRGS, 154 p.
  3. Berkwood Resources Inc. (2018) Report on mise‐à‐la‐masse & induced polarization surveys performed on the Lac Guéret extension property Manicouagan RCM, North Shore region, Quebec. Toronto, Ontario: Berkwood Resources Inc. Reference: 18C‐313, November 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bertin, J. & Loeb, J. (1976) Experimental and theoretical aspects of induced polarization, vol. 1. Berlin‐Stuttgart, Germany: Gebruder Borntraeger, Geopublicaton Associates, pp. 250.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bettencourt, J.S. (1972) A mina de cobre do Camaquã, RS. Instituto de Geociências. Tese de Doutorado. São Paulo: USP, 176 p.
  6. Bowker, A. (1991) Quantitative interpretation on three‐dimensional mise‐à‐la‐masse data. A case history from Gairloch, Northwest Scotland. Geoexploration, 28, 1–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cowan, D.R., Allchurch, P.D. & Omnes, G. (1975) An integrated geoelectric on the Nangoroo copper zinc prospect Near Western Australia. Geoexploration, 13, 77–98.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dakir, I., Benamara, A., Aassoumi, H., Ouallali, A. & Bahammou, Y.A. (2019) Application of induced polarization and resistivity to the determination of the location of metalliferous veins in the Taroucht and Tabesbaste Areas (Eastern Anti‐Atlas, Morocco). International Journal of Geophysics, 2019, 5849019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5849019.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Daniels, J.J. (1983) Hole to surface resistivity measurements. Geophysics, 48, 87–97. 1.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. De Carlo, L., Perri, M.T.,Caputo, M.C., Deiana, R., Vurro, M. & Cassiani, G. (2013) Characterization of a dismissed landfill via electrical resistivity tomography and mise‐à‐la‐masse method. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 98, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2013.07.010.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dusabemariya, C., Qian, W., Bagaragaza, R., Faruwa, A.R. & Ali, M. (2020) Some experiences of resistivity and induced polarization methods on the exploration of sulfide: a review. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 8(11), 68–92. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2020.811004.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Elis, V.R.,Ustra, A.T.,Hidalgo‐Gato, M.C.,Pejon, O.J. & Hiodo, F.Y. (2016) Application of induced polarization and resistivity to the environmental investigation of an old waste disposal area. Environmental Earth Sciences (Internet), 75, 1338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665‐016‐6157‐5.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Elloranta, E.H. (1985) A comparison between mise‐à‐la‐masse anomalies obtained pole‐pole and pole‐dipole electrode configuration. Geoexploration, 23, 471–481.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fragoso‐Cesar, A.R.S., Paes‐de‐Almeida, R., Fambrini, G.L., Pelosi, A.P.M.R. & Janikian, L. (2003) A Bacia Camaquã: um sistema intracontinental anorogênico de rifts do Neoproterozóico III‐Eopaleozóico no Rio Grande do Sul. Rio Grande do Sul: Escudos e Bacias, 1, Anais, SBG, Encontro Estrat, pp. 139–144.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gallas, J.D.F. & Birelli, C.A. (1983) Polarização induzida na jazida Santa Maria (RS): caracterização de zonas de enriquecimento (sulfetos maciços). In: Anais do I Simpósio Sul‐Brasileiro de Geologia, vol. 1. Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil, pp. 237–244.
  16. Gallas, J.D.F. (2000) Principais MétodosGeoelétricos e suas Aplicações em Prospecção Mineral, Hidrogeologia, Geologia de Engenharia e Geologia Ambiental. Tese (Doutorado em Geociências e Meio Ambiente) – Instituto de Geociências e Ciências Exatas. Rio Claro: Universidade Estadual Paulista, p. 174.
  17. Gallas, J.D.F., Taioli, F. & Malagutti Filho, W. (2011) Induced polarization, resistivity, and self‐potential: a case history of contamination evaluation due to landfill leakage. Environmental Earth Sciences, 63, 251–261, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665‐010‐0696‐y.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gallas, J.D.F. (2015) Quartz prospecting with induced polarization (IP) and resistivity by using gradient and dipole‐dipole arrays. Revista Brasileira de Geofísica (Impresso), 33, 1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Garner, L. (1963) Apparatus for electric potential investigation. Geoexploration, 2, 32–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Gupta, D. (2007) Mise‐à‐la‐masse – a cost effective method in mineral exploration. Journal of Geological Society of India, 69, 203–204.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hatanaka, H., Tetsuo, A., Mizunaga, H. & Ushijima, K. (2005) Three‐dimensional modeling and inversion of the mise‐à‐la‐masse data using a steel‐casing borehole. Proceedings of the world geothermal congress, Antalya, pp. 24–29.
  22. Laux, J.H. & Lindenmayer, Z.G. (2000) As Minas do Camaquã: um século de evolução de hipóteses genéticas. In: Ronchi, L.H. & Lobato, O.C. (Eds.) A0073 Minas do Camaquã. São Leopoldo: Editora UNISINOS, pp. 133–164.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Leinz, V. & Almeida, S. (1941) Gênese da Jazida de Cobre de Camaquã. Porto Alegre: DPM, Secretaria dos Negócios de Agricultura Indústria e Comércio do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (Boletim 88), 56 p.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Li, J., He, Z., Wu, X. & Zhi, Z. (2021) MALM‐based induced polarization method for heavy metal pollution leakage monitoring: methodology and modeling results. Geophysics, Just‐Accepted Articles, 87, EN57‐EN67. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2021‐0674.1.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Ling, C., Revil, A., Qi, Y., Abdulsamad, F., Shi, P., Nicaise, S. & Peyras, L. (2019) Application of the Mise‐à‐la‐Masse method to detect the bottom leakage of water reservoirs. Engineering Geology, 261, 105272. 105272.10.1016/j.enggeo.105271. hal‐02324231.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Ketola, M. (1972) Some points of view concerning mise‐à‐la‐masse measurements. Geoexploration, 10, 1–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Mary, B., Peruzzo, L., Boaga, J., Schmutz, M., Wu, Y., Hubbard, S.S. et al. (2018) Small‐scale characterization of vine plant root water uptake via 3‐D electrical resistivity tomography and mise‐à‐la‐masse method. Hydrology Earth System Sciences, 22, 5427–5444.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Mary, B., Vanella, D., Consoli, S. & Cassiani, G. (2019) Assessing the extent of citrus trees root apparatus under deficit irrigation via multi‐method geo‐electrical imaging. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 9913. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598‐019‐46107‐w.www.nature.com/scientificreports
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Parasnis, D.S. (1971) Geofisica Minera. Madrid: E. Paraninfo, pp. 376.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Pelton, W.H. & Hallof, P.G. (1972) The applied potential method in the search for massive sulfides at York Harbour, Newfoundland. Transactions of the SMF/AIME, 252, 121–124.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Rigoti, A. (1985) Reduction of ambiguity in geoelectric models using multiple data sets. M. Sc. Thesis. Montreal, Canada: Mc Gill University, pp. 129.
  32. Siegel, H., Nabighian, M., Parasnis, D.F. & Vozof, K. (2007) The early history of the induced polarization method. The Leading Edge, 26(3), 312–321. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2715054.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Snyder, D.D. & Merkel, R.H. (1973) Analytic models for the interpretation of electrical surveys using buried current electrodes. Geophysics, 38, 513–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Sogade, J.A.,Scira‐Scapuzzo, F., Vichabian, Y., Shi, W., Rodi, W., Lesmes, D.P. et al. (2006) Induced‐polarization detection and mapping of contaminant plumes. Geophysics, 71, B75–B84. 3. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2196873.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Wondimu, H.D.,Tilahun, M. & Blaine, W. (2018) 3D joint inversion of gradient and mise‐à‐la‐masse borehole IP/resistivity data and its application to magmatic sulfide mineral deposit exploration. Acta Geophysica, 66(5), 1031–1045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600‐018‐0199‐x.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Zarif, F., Kessouri, P. & Slater, L. (2017) Recommendations for field‐scale induced polarization (IP) data acquisition and interpretation. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 22(4), 1083–1363. ISSN (online):1943‐2658.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12254
Loading
/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12254
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error