1887
Volume 21, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

Abstract

Rice is a staple crop in the Vietnam Mekong Delta (VMD) in which more than half of Vietnam's rice is produced. However, rice production in the VMD is threatened by increasing saltwater intrusion due to land subsidence and climate change induced sea level rise. Saltwater intrusion into lowland areas through the canal system or capillary rise of saline water from near surface saline water tables may result in salt accumulation in the topsoil. Therefore, it is important to disentangle the two effects and their relative importance to implement appropriate strategies for water and salinity management for adapting rice production systems of the VMD to climate change. Here, we report on the possibility of using geoelectrical methods to evaluate the potential threat of subsoil salinity to rice production. To evaluate the level of subsoil salinity, we measured soil electrical resistivity using an ARES II to a depth of 40 m in a case study comprising five locations in the VMD. Electrical resistivity measurements were calibrated to soil types, which were identified through evaluating 1 m core sections obtained by drilling down to 40 m depth. The relationship between drilling data and soil resistivity was determined by applying clustering and principal component analysis. Resistivity values smaller than 3 Ω m were clearly identified as indicative for a saline water table. The results show a direct link between the depth of the saline water table and the proximity to the sea, but not to the rice production system (single, double, or triple cropping). This study proved for the first time the applicability of the electrical resistivity tomography method for identifying groundwater tables and evaluating subsoil salinity on an agricultural field scale in the VMD.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12260
2023-07-17
2026-03-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/nsg/21/4/nsg12260.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12260&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Araya Vargas, J., Gil, P.M., Meza, F.J., Yáñez, G., Menanno, G., García‐Gutiérrez, V. et al. (2021) Soil electrical resistivity monitoring as a practical tool for evaluating irrigation systems efficiency at the orchard scale: a case study in a vineyard in Central Chile. Irrigation Science, 39, 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271‐020‐00708‐w
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brouwer, C., Goffeau, A. & Heibloem, M. (1985) Irrigation water management: training manual no. 1 – introduction to irrigation. Rome: FAO. https://www.fao.org/3/r4082e/r4082e08.htm#7.2%20salinity [Assessed 20 October 2022]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security ‐ Southeast Asia (CCAFS SEA) . (2016) Assessment report: the drought and salinity intrusion in the Mekong River Delta of Vietnam. Hanoi, Vietnam: CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cimpoiaşu, M.O., Kuras, O., Pridmore, T. & Mooney, S.J. (2020) Potential of geoelectrical methods to monitor root zone processes and structure: a review. Geoderma, 365, 114232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114232
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cong‐Thi, D., Dieu, L.P., Thibaut, R., Paepen, M., Ho, H.H., Nguyen, F. et al. (2021) Imaging the structure and the saltwater intrusion extent of the Luy river coastal aquifer (Binh Thuan, Vietnam) using electrical resistivity tomography. Water (Switzerland), 13, 1743. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13131743
    [Google Scholar]
  6. de Franco, R., Biella, G., Tosi, L., Teatini, P., Lozej, A., Chiozzotto, B. et al. (2009) Monitoring the saltwater intrusion by time lapse electrical resistivity tomography: the Chioggia test site (Venice Lagoon, Italy). Journal of Applied Geophysics, 69, 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2009.08.004
    [Google Scholar]
  7. El‐Hamdouchi, A. & Willett, P. (1989) Comparison of hierarchic agglomerative clustering methods for document retrieval. The Computer Journal, 32, 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/32.3.220
    [Google Scholar]
  8. FAO . (2016) “El NiÑo” event in Viet Nam – Agriculture, food security and livelihood needs assessment in response to drought and salt water intrusion. https://www.fao.org/3/i6020e/i6020e.pdf
  9. Galazoulas, E.C., Mertzanides, Y.C., Petalas, C.P. & Kargiotis, E.K. (2015) Large scale electrical resistivity tomography survey correlated to hydrogeological data for mapping groundwater salinization: a case study from a multilayered coastal aquifer in Rhodope, Northeastern Greece. Environmental Processes, 2, 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710‐015‐0061‐y
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gemail, K., Samir, A., Oelsner, C., Mousa, S.E. & Ibrahim, S. (2004) Study of saltwater intrusion using 1D, 2D and 3D resistivity surveys in the coastal depressions at the eastern part of Matruh area, Egypt. Near Surface Geophysics, 2, 103–109. https://doi.org/10.3997/1873‐0604.2004007
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Giao, P.H., Chung, S.G., Kim, D.Y. & Tanaka, H. (2003) Electric imaging and laboratory resistivity testing for geotechnical investigation of Pusan clay deposits. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 52, 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926‐9851(03)00002‐8
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gołębiowski, T. & Jarosińska, E. (2019) Application of GPR and ERT methods for recognizing of gypsum deposits in urban areas. Acta Geophysica, 67, 2015–2030.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Greenacre, M., Groenen, P.J.F., Hastie, T., D'Enza, A.I., Markos, A. & Tuzhilina, E. (2022) Principal component analysis. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 2, 100. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586‐022‐00184‐w
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ha, Q.K., Tran Ngoc, T.D., Le Vo, P., Nguyen, H.Q. & Dang, D.H. (2022) Groundwater in Southern Vietnam: understanding geochemical processes to better preserve the critical water resource. Science of the Total Environment, 807(part 2), 151345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151345
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kolde, R. (2019) pheatmap: pretty heatmaps. R package version 1.0.12. https://CRAN.R‐project.org/package=pheatmap
  16. Loke, M.H. (2021) Tutorial: 2‐D and 3‐D electrical imaging surveys. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264739285_Tutorial_2‐D_and_3‐D_Electrical_Imaging_Surveys [Accessed 17 August 2022]
  17. Minderhoud, P.S.J., Coumou, L., Erkens, G., Middelkoop, H. & Stouthamer, E. (2019) Mekong delta much lower than previously assumed in sea‐level rise impact assessments. Nature Communications, 10, 3847. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467‐019‐11602‐1
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Mohamaden, M. & Ehab, D. (2017) Application of electrical resistivity for groundwater exploration in Wadi Rahaba, Shalateen, Egypt. NRIAG Journal of Astronomy and Geophysics, 6, 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrjag.2017.01.001
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Murtagh, F. & Contreras, P. (2012) Algorithms for hierarchical clustering: an overview. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2, 86–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.53
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Nguyen, L.D., Nguyen, T.V.K., Nguyen, D.V., Tran, A.T., Nguyen, H.T., Heidbüchel, I. et al. (2021) Groundwater dynamics in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta: trends, memory effects, and response times. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 33, 100746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2020.100746
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Nowroozi, A.A., Horrocks, S.B. & Henderson, P. (1999) Saltwater intrusion into the freshwater aquifer in the eastern shore of Virginia: a reconnaissance electrical resistivity survey. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 42, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926‐9851(99)00004‐X
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Palacky, G.J. (1987) Resistivity characteristics of geologic targets. Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics, 1, 53–129. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560802631.ch3
    [Google Scholar]
  23. R Core Team . (2021) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R‐project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Rao, S., Lesparre, N., Flores‐Orozco, A., Wagner, F., Kemna, A. & Javaux, M. (2020) Imaging plant responses to water deficit using electrical resistivity tomography. Plant and Soil, 454, 261–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104‐020‐04653‐7
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Riwayat, A.I., Ahmad Nazri, M.A. & Zainal Abidin, M.H. (2018) Application of electrical resistivity method (ERM) in groundwater exploration. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 995, 012094. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742‐6596/995/1/012094
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Samouëlian, A., Cousin, I., Tabbagh, A., Bruand, A. & Richard, G. (2005) Electrical resistivity survey in soil science: a review. Soil and Tillage Research, 83, 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2004.10.004
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Schneider, P. & Asch, F. (2020) Rice production and food security in Asian Mega deltas – a review on characteristics, vulnerabilities and agricultural adaptation options to cope with climate change. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 206, 491–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12415
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Shevnin, V., Delgado Rodríguez, O., Mousatov, A., Flores Hernández, D., Zegarra Martínez, H. & Ryjov, A. (2006) Estimation of soil petrophysical parameters from resistivity data: application to oil‐contaminated site characterization. International Geophysics, 45, 179–193.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Takahashi, A., Hashimoto, M., Hu, J., Takeuschi, K. & Tsai, M. (2019) Hierarchical cluster analysis of dense GPS data and examination of the nature of the clusters associated with regional tectonics in Taiwan. Geophysical Research Letters: Solid Earth, 124, 5174–5191. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB016995
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Tan, X., Shao, D. & Liu, H. (2014) Simulating soil water regime in lowland paddy fields under different water managements using HYDRUS‐1D. Agricultural Water Management, 132, 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2013.10.009
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Tran, D.A., Tsujimura, M., Pham, H.V., Nguyen, T.V., Ho, L.H., Le Vo, P. et al. (2022) Intensified salinity intrusion in coastal aquifers due to groundwater over extraction: a case study in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 8996–9010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356‐021‐16282‐3
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Tran, P.H. (2020) Assessment of changes in the structure land use in Tra Vinh Province under the scenarios of climate change and sea level rise. Vietnam Journal of Science and Technology, 58, 70–83. https://doi.org/10.15625/2525‐2518/58/1/13982
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Tyler, R.H., Boyer, T.P., Minami, T., Zweng, M.M. & Reagan, J.R. (2017) Electrical conductivity of the global ocean. Earth, Planets and Space, 69, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623‐017‐0739‐7
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Van Kien, N., Hoang Han, N. & Cramb, R. (2020) Trends in rice‐based farming systems in the Mekong Delta. In: Cramb, R. (Ed.) White gold: the commercialisation of rice farming in the lower Mekong Basin. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978‐981‐15‐0998‐8_17
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Yen, B.T., Son, N.H., Tung, L.T., Amjath‐Babu, T.S. & Sebastian, L. (2019) Development of a participatory approach for mapping climate risks and adaptive interventions (CS‐MAP) in Vietnam's Mekong River Delta. Climate Risk Management, 24, 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2019.04.004
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Zohdy, A.A.R., Martin, P.M. & Bisdorf, R.J. (1993) A study of seawater intrusion using direct‐current soundings in the southeastern part of the Oxnard Plain, California, vol. 93. US Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr93524
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12260
Loading
/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12260
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): conductivity; electrical resistivity tomography; groundwater; site effect

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error