How to promote geophysics as a standard tool for geotechnical investigations

References

1. Abidin, A., Nordin, H., Khan, M., Sulaiman, M., Hussin, H., Abdullah, A. et al. (2020) Slope failure investigation in weathered granitic rock mass using electrical resistivity imaging: case study in kg Bukit Selar, Jeli, Kelantan, Malaysia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 569(2020), 012056. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755‐1315/596/1/012056
   [Google Scholar]
2. Adenuga, O. & Popoola, O. (2020) Subsurface characterization using electrical resistivity and MASW techniques for suitable municipal solid waste disposal site. SN applied sciences, 2, 1549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452‐020‐03320‐x
   [Google Scholar]
3. Akingboye, A. & Osazuwa, I. (2021) Subsurface geological, hydrogeophysical and engineering characterisation of Etioro‐Akoko, southwestern Nigeria, using electrical resistivity tomography. NRIAG Journal of Astronomy and Geophysics, 10(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/20909977.2020.1868659
   [Google Scholar]
4. Aray, J., Avila, J., Lacan, P. & Vargas, J. (2021) GPR and its potential to ground characterizing: example cases. In First EAGE conference on near surface in Latin America, March 2021, Vol 2021, 1‐5. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214‐4609.202185014
5. ASTM . (2011) D6429 –99, standard guide for selecting surface geophysical methods. West Conshohocken: ASTM.
   [Google Scholar]
6. ASTM . (2018a) D6431 –18, standard guide for using the direct current resistivity method for subsurface site characterization. West Conshohocken: ASTM.
   [Google Scholar]
7. ASTM . (2018b) D5777 –18, standard guide for using the seismic refraction method for subsurface investigation. West Conshohocken: ASTM.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bazin, S. & Pfaffhuber, A. (2013) Mapping of quick clay by electrical resistivity tomography under structural constraint. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 98, 280–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2013.09.002
   [Google Scholar]
9. Birken, R., Miller, D., Burns, M., Albats, P., Casadonte, R., Deming, R. et al. (2002) Efficient large‐scale underground utility mapping with a multi‐channel ground penetrating imaging radar system. In 9th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar. SPIE, 2002, 4758, 186–191.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Borcherdt, D. (2012) Vs30 A site‐characterization parameter for use in building codes, simplified earthquake resistant design, GMPEs, and ShakeMaps. In 15th World Conference of Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal. Paper WCEE2012_0173.
11. British Standards Institution (BSI) . (1989) BS 7022:1988, Guide for geophysical logging of boreholes for hydrogeological purposes. London: BSI
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dahlin, T. & Loke, M. (2018) Underwater ERT surveying in water with resistivity layering with example of application to site investigation for a rock tunnel in central Stockholm. Near Surface Geophysics, 16(3), 230–237. https://doi.org/10.3997/1873‐0604.2018007
    [Google Scholar]
13. Emilsson, J., Gustafsson, J., Langton, M. & Viberg, A. (2021) Higher resolution antenna technique for efficient large‐scale, 3D array GPR investigations. In SEG Global Meeting Abstract. 150–153. https://doi.org/10.1190/segj2021‐041.1
    [Google Scholar]
14. Gemail, K., Shebl, S., Attwa, M., Soliman, S., Azab, A. & Farag, M. (2020) Geotechnical assessment of fractured limestone bedrock using DC resistivity method: a case study at New Minia City, Egypt. NRIAG Journal of Astronomy and Geophysics, 9(1), 272–279.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Gustafsson, J. (2013) Att använda georadar som komplement till geoteknisk undersökning. InGrundläggningsdagen (The Foundation Day Conference) 7th March 2013, Stockholm, Sweden . In Swedish.
16. Gustafsson, J. (2019) The use of geophysics in large Swedish infrastructure projects. In 1St Conference on Geophysics for Infrastructure Planning Monitoring and BIM, Sept 2019, Vol 2019, 1‐5. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214‐4609.201902543
    [Google Scholar]
17. Gustafsson, J. & Higgs, H. (2022) GPR—useful and effective complement for geotechnical investigations. In. In GPR2022 Conference, Denver, Colorado, 12–17th June 2022.
18. Hammarlund, E. & Wisén, R. (2013) Resistivitetsundersökning (CVES) på Kristianstadsslätten optimerar grundvattenskydd vid motorvägsbygge. In Grundvattendagarna 2013, Lund, 16–17 oktober. SGU rapporter och Meddelanden 135, 35. In Swedish
19. Hasan, M., Shang, Y. & Jin, W. (2018) Delineation of weathered/fracture zones for aquifer potential using an integrated geophysical approach: a case study from South China. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 157, 47–60.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Highways England . (2020) Data for pavement assessment (Revision 0). CS 229. Guildford: Highways England.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Institute of Civil Engineers & British Standards Institution . (2014) PAS 128 Specification for underground utility detection, verification and location. Institute of Civil Engineers & British Standards Institution, UK.
22. Kowalczyk, S., Łukasiak, D. & Żukowska, K. (2014) Ground penetrating radar survey in the central and eastern part of the Całowanie Fen, Central Poland. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on ground penetrating radar, GPR 2014. Brussels, Belgium, 2014, 1011‐1016. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGPR.2014.6970579
23. Luoma, S., Majaniemi, T., Nurminen, T. & Pasanen, A. (2014) GPR survey and field work summary in Siilijärvi mine during July 2014. Geological Survey of Finland, 74/2014, 46.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Park, C. (2013) MASW for geotechnical site investigation. The Leading Edge, 32, 656–662.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Rogers, S., Boehm, H.‐D. & Clague, A. (2012) Ground penetrating radar mapping of peat depth. Researchgate, Publication 277278312.
26. Robertson, P., Campanella, R., Gillespie, D. & Rice, A. (1986) Seismic Cpt to measure in situ shear wave velocity. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 112(8), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9410(1986)112:8(791)
    [Google Scholar]
27. Rossi, M., Olsson, P., Johanson, S., Fiandaca, G., Bergdahl, D.P. & Dahlin, T. (2017) Mapping geological structures in bedrock via large‐scale direct current resistivity and time‐domain induced polarization tomography. Near Surface Geophysics, 15, 657–667. https://doi.org/10.3997/1873‐0604.2017058
    [Google Scholar]
28. Sutter, E. & Barounis, N. (2021) Underground void detection by applying the electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) method for a limestone quarry in Northland, NZ. In 21st NZGS Symposium, 24‐26 March 2021, Dunedin, New Zealand.
29. Svensson, M. & Friberg, O. (2017) GeoBIM—a tool for optimal geotechnical design. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Seoul, 2017. London, International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. 1781–1784.
30. Svensson, M. & Friberg, O. (2018) Communication of geophysics in underground infrastructure projects. In Proceedings of the 31st Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and environmental Problems, Nashville, Tennessee USA, March 25–29, 361‐366. https://doi.org/10.4133/sageep.31‐032
31. Svensson, M., Firberg, O., Brodic, B. & Malehmir, A. (2019). Efficient communication of geologically related data and 3D models in tunnelling projects. In: Peila, D., Viggiani, G. & Celestino, T. (Eds.) Tunnels and underground cities. Engineering and innovation meet archaeology, architecture and art, 1182–1189. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003029748‐69
    [Google Scholar]
32. Svensson, M.,Gustafsson, J. & Wisén, R. (2020) Geofysik som standardmetod vid alla geoundersökningar minskar geotekniska osäkerheter. Samhällsbyggaren:, 1/2020, 30–32. In Swedish.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Tye, A., Kessler, H., Ambrose, K., Williams, J.D.O., Tragheim, D., Scheib, A. et al. (2011) Using integrated near‐surface geophysical surveys to aid mapping and interpretation of geology in an alluvial landscape within a 3D soil‐geology framework. Near Surface Geophysics, 9, 15–31.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Vargemezis, G., Tsourlos, P.I., Fikos, I., Diamanti, N., Angelis, D. & Amanatidou, E., (2019) Void detection and consolidation filling verification by ERT, GPR and seismic refraction methods. In 1st conference on geophysics for infrastructure planning monitoring and BIM, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214‐4609.201902525
35. GuidelineGeo AB . (2024). Guideline Geo, accessed June 2024. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHzW0Jt1IMesLBT4dEoK6xw
36. GuidelineGeo AB . (2024). Help articles, accessed June 2024. https://www.guidelinegeo.com/category/help‐articles/
37. ParkSeismic LLC . (2024). Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW), accessed June 2024. https://www.MASW.com
38. TheSociety of Exploration Geophysicists. . (2024). The SEG Wiki, accessed June 2024. https://wiki.seg.org/wiki