High‐resolution surface‐wave‐constrained mapping of sparse dynamic cone penetrometer tests

References

1. Adama, D., Bryson, L.S. & Wang, A. (2023) Airfield suitability assessment from geophysical methods. Transportation Geotechnics, 42, 101059.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aki, K. & Richards, P.G. (2002) Quantitative seismology. Sausalito, CA: University Science Books.
   [Google Scholar]
3. ASTM D6951 (2009) Standard test method for use of the dynamic cone penetrometer in shallow pavement applications. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
4. Bergamo, P., Boiero, D. & Socco, L.V. (2012) Retrieving 2D structures from surface‐wave data by means of space‐varying spatial windowing. Geophysics, 77(4), EN39–EN51.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bodet, L., van Wijk, K., Bitri, A., Abraham, O., Côte, P., Grandjean, G., & Leparoux, D. (2005) Surface‐wave inversion limitations from laser‐Doppler physical modeling. Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics, 10(2), 151–162.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Burzawa, A., Bodet, L., Dhemaied, A., Dangeard, M., Pasquet, S., Vitale, Q., Boisson‐Gaboriau, J. & Cui, Y.J. (2023) Detecting mechanical property anomalies along railway earthworks by Bayesian appraisal of MASW data. Construction and Building Materials, 404, 133224.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Chiles, J.‐P. & Delfiner, P. (2009) Geostatistics: Modeling spatial uncertainty, volume 497. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Christensen, W.F. (2011) Filtered kriging for spatial data with heterogeneous measurement error variances. Biometrics, 67(3), 947–957.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cosenza, P., Marmet, E., Rejiba, F., Cui, Y.J., Tabbagh, A. & Charlery, Y. (2006) Correlations between geotechnical and electrical data: A case study at Garchy in France. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 60(3‐4), 165–178.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Feng, S., Sugiyama, T. & Yamanaka, H. (2001) Application of sensitivity analysis to array design for microtremor array survey. In Proceedings of the 104th SEGJ conference. Houston, TX: Society of Exploration Geophysicists and Society of Exploration Geophysicists of Japan, pp. 35–39.
11. Foti, S., Hollender, F., Garofalo, F., Albarello, D., Asten, M., Bard, P.‐Y., Comina, C., Cornou, C., Cox, B., Di Giulio, G., et al. (2018) Guidelines for the good practice of surface wave analysis: a product of the inter‐Pacific project. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 16, 2367–2420.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Goovaerts, P. (1998) Ordinary cokriging revisited. Mathematical Geology, 30(1), 21–42.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gringarten, E. & Deutsch, C.V. (2001) Teacher's aide variogram interpretation and modeling. Mathematical Geology, 33(4), 507–534.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Haines, S.S., Pidlisecky, A. & Knight, R. (2009) Hydrogeologic structure underlying a recharge pond delineated with shear‐wave seismic reflection and cone penetrometer data. Near Surface Geophysics, 7(5–6), 329–340.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hayashi, K. (2008) Development of surface‐wave methods and its application to site investigations. Ph.D. dissertation. Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
16. Hayashi, K. & Suzuki, H. (2004) CMP cross‐correlation analysis of multi‐channel surface‐wave data. Exploration Geophysics, 35(1), 7–13.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Huang, J., Zheng, D., Li, D.‐Q., Kelly, R. & Sloan, S.W. (2018) Probabilistic characterization of two‐dimensional soil profile by integrating cone penetration test (CPT) with multi‐channel analysis of surface wave (MASW) data. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 55(8), 1168–1181.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Li, J. & Heap, A.D. (2008) A Review of Spatial Interpolation Methods for Environmental Scientists. Geoscience Australia, Record 2008/23, 137 pp.
19. Masoli, C.A., Petronio, L., Gordini, E., Deponte, M., Boehm, G., Cotterle, D., Romeo, R., Barbagallo, A., Belletti, R., Maffione, S., et al. (2020) Near‐shore geophysical and geotechnical investigations in support of the Trieste marine terminal extension. Near Surface Geophysics, 18(1), 73–89. Special issue on quantitative geophysical characterisation of marine near surface.
20. Mayne, P.W. & Rix, G.J. (1995) Correlations between shear wave velocity and cone tip resistance in natural clays. Soils and Foundations, 35(2), 107–110.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Mohammadi, S., Nikoudel, M., Rahimi, H. & Khamehchiyan, M. (2008) Application of the dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP) for determination of the engineering parameters of sandy soils. Engineering Geology, 101(3‐4), 195–203.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Mola‐Abasi, H., Dikmen, U. & Shooshpasha, I. (2015) Prediction of shear‐wave velocity from CPT data at Eskisehir (Turkey), using a polynomial model. Near Surface Geophysics, 13(2), 155–168.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Nazarian, S., Tandon, V., Crain, K. & Yuan, D. (2000) Use of instrumented dynamic cone penetrometer in pavement characterization. ASTM Special Technical Publication, 1375, 214–230.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Oliver, M. & Webster, R. (2014) A tutorial guide to geostatistics: computing and modelling variograms and kriging. Catena, 113, 56–69.
    [Google Scholar]
25. O'Neill, A. (2004) Shear velocity model appraisal in shallow surface wave inversion. In Symposium on the Application of geophysics to engineering and environmental problems 2004. Houston, TX: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp. 1544–1555.
26. Pasquet, S. & Bodet, L. (2017) Swip: an integrated workflow for surface‐wave dispersion inversion and profiling. Geophysics, 82(6), WB47–WB61.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Porter, O. (1939) The preparation of subgrades. In: Highway research board proceedings. Washington, DC: Highway Research Board, volume 18, 324‐331.
28. Pugin, A.J., Larson, T.H., Sargent, S.L., McBride, J.H. & Bexfield, C.E. (2004) Near‐surface mapping using SH‐wave and P‐wave seismic land‐streamer data acquisition in Illinois, US. The Leading Edge, 23(7), 677–682.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Sambridge, M. (1999) Geophysical inversion with a neighbourhood algorithm‐II. Appraising the ensemble. Geophysical Journal International, 138(3), 727–746.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Sastre Jurado, C., Breul, P., Bacconnet, C. & Benz‐Navarrete, M. (2021) Probabilistic 3D modelling of shallow soil spatial variability using dynamic cone penetrometer results and a geostatistical method. Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, 15(2), 139–151.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Satopaa, V., Albrecht, J., Irwin, D. & Raghavan, B. (2011) Finding a‘ kneedle’ in a haystack: detecting knee points in system behavior. In: 2011 31st international conference on distributed computing systems workshops, Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, pp. 166–171.
32. Socco, L. & Strobbia, C. (2004) Surface‐wave method for near‐surface characterization: a tutorial. Near Surface Geophysics, 2(4), 165–185.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Van der Veen, M. & Green, A.G. (1998) Land streamer for shallow seismic data acquisition: evaluation of gimbal‐mounted geophones. Geophysics, 63(4), 1408–1413.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Vantassel, J.P., Cox, B.R., Hubbard, P.G. & Yust, M. (2022) Extracting high‐resolution, multi‐mode surface wave dispersion data from distributed acoustic sensing measurements using the multichannel analysis of surface waves. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 205, 104776.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Wackernagel, H. (2003) Multivariate geostatistics: an introduction with applications. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Wathelet, (2004) Surface‐wave inversion using a direct search algorithm and its application to ambient vibration measurements. Near Surface Geophysics, 2(4), 211–221.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Wawerzinek, B., Lüth, S., Esefelder, R., Giese, R. & Krawczyk, C.M. (2022) Performance of high‐resolution impact and vibration sources for underground seismic exploration of clay formations at the scale of a rock laboratory. Geophysical Journal International, 231(3), 1750–1766.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Webster, S.L., Grau, R.H. & Williams, T.P. (1992) Description and application of dual mass dynamic cone penetrometer. Technical report, Geotechnical Laboratory (US)
39. Xu, J., Wang, Y. & Zhang, L. (2022) Fusion of geotechnical and geophysical data for 2D subsurface site characterization using multi‐source Bayesian compressive sampling. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 59(10), 1756–1773.
    [Google Scholar]