1887
Volume 24, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604
PDF

Abstract

Abstract

This study presents a methodological framework for estimating electromagnetic wave velocities in ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) data based exclusively on the analysis of diffractions. The approach integrates diffraction separation using the plane wave destruction algorithm and subsequent velocity refinement through the residual diffraction moveout (RDM) technique. The methodology was initially validated on synthetic datasets with controlled geological complexity, including models with lateral and vertical velocity variations. These synthetic models were intentionally designed to simulate environments rich in diffracted events, replicating conditions similar to those observed in real data. Results from synthetic tests demonstrated the capacity of the methodology to isolate diffraction hyperbolas effectively, estimate local velocities and generate coherent velocity models suitable for migration. The workflow was then applied to real GPR data acquired on the Detroit Plateau, Antarctic Peninsula. The resulting velocity model aligned well with previous studies based on common midpoint analysis, highlighting structural variations associated with firn densification and the firn–ice transition zone. Kirchhoff migration using the RDM‐derived velocity model led to more precise reflector imaging and improved subsurface structural interpretation. This study demonstrates that diffraction‐based velocity modelling can provide accurate and high‐resolution subsurface characterization, particularly in environments with low lateral velocity contrast where conventional methods may be limited.

© 2026 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. © 2026 The Author(s). Near Surface Geophysics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.70040
2026-03-09
2026-04-10

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1002/nsg.70040
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/nsg/24/2/nsg70040.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.70040&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Al‐Yahya, K.. (2008) Velocity analysis by iterative profile migration. In Prestack depth migration and velocity model building. Houston, TX: Society of Exploration Geophysicists. 718–729
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Annan, A.. (2001) Ground penetrating radar workshop notes. Sensors & Software Inc., Ontario, Canada.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Annan, A.. (2002) GPR‐history, trends, and future developments. Subsurface Sensing Technologies and Applications, 3(4), 253–270.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker, G.S., Jordan, T.E. & Pardy, J.. (2007) An introduction to ground penetrating radar (GPR). https://doi.org/10.1130/2007.2432(01)
  5. Berkovitch, A., Belfer, I., Hassin, Y. & Landa, E.. (2009) Diffraction imaging by multifocusing. Geophysics, 74(6), WCA75–WCA81.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bitri, A. & Grandjean, G.. (2008) Frequency–wavenumber modelling and migration of 2D GPR data in moderately heterogeneous dispersive media. Geophysical Prospecting, 46(3), 287–301.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Booth, A.D., Clark, R.A. & Murray, T.. (2011) Influences on the resolution of GPR velocity analyses and a Monte Carlo simulation for establishing velocity precision. Near Surface Geophysics, 9(5), 399–411.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bradford, J. H.. (2015) Reverse‐time prestack depth migration of GPR data from topography for amplitude reconstruction in complex environments. Journal of Earth Science, 26, 791–798.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Claerbout, J.F.. (1992) Earth soundings analysis|processing versus inversion. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Coimbra, T., de Figueiredo, J., Novais, A. & Schleicher, J. (2011) Migration velocity analysis with diffraction events using residual moveout. Annual WIT Report, 15, 57–70.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Coimbra, T. A., de Figueiredo, J. J. S., Schleicher, J., Novais, A. & Costa, J. C.. (2013) Migration velocity analysis using residual diffraction moveout in the poststack depth domain. Geophysics, 78(3), S125–S135.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Cui, F., Li, S. & Wang, L. (2018) The accurate estimation of GPR migration velocity and comparison of imaging methods. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 159, 573–585.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. de Figueiredo, J., Oliveira, F., Esmi, E., Freitas, L., Green, S., Novais, A., & Schleicher, J.. (2011) Diffraction imaging point of common‐offset gather: GPR data example. In the 12th International Congress of the Brazilian Geophysical Society, (cp‐264). Houten, the Netherlands: European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Economou, N., Vafidis, A., Bano, M., Hamdan, H., & Ortega‐Ramirez, J.. (2020) Ground‐penetrating radar data diffraction focusing without a velocity model. Geophysics, 85(3), H13–H24.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Fomel, S. (2002) Applications of plane‐wave destruction filters. Geophysics, 67, 1946–1960.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Fomel, S., Landa, E. & Taner, M.T. (2007) Poststack velocity analysis by separation and imaging of seismic diffractions. Geophysics, 72(6), U89–U94.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Forte, E., Dossi, M., Pipan, M., & Colucci, R.R.. (2014) Velocity analysis from common offset GPR data inversion: Theory and application to synthetic and real data. Geophysical Journal International, 197(3), 1471–1483.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Forte, E. & Pipan, M. (2017) Review of multi‐offset GPR applications: Data acquisition, processing and analysis. Signal Processing, 132, 210–220.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Giannopoulos, A.. (2005) Modelling ground penetrating radar by GprMax. Construction and Building Materials, 19(10), 755–762.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Gonzalez, J.A., De Figueiredo, J.J., Coimbra, T.A., Schleicher, J., & Novais, A.. (2016) Migration velocity analysis using residual diffraction moveout: A real‐data example. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 13(4), 622–633.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Gray, S.H., Etgen, J., Dellinger, J. & Whitmore, D.. (2001) Seismic migration problems and solutions. Geophysics, 66(5), 1622–1640.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Hamdan, H., Economou, N., Vafidis, A., Bano, M., & Ortega‐Ramirez, J.. (2022) A new approach for adaptive GPR diffraction focusing. Remote Sensing, 14(11), 2547.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Hubral, P., Tygel, M. & Schleicher, J. (1996) Seismic image waves. Geophysical Journal International, 125, 431–442.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Jol, H.M.. (2008) Ground penetrating radar theory and applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Khaidukov, V.. (2004) Diffraction imaging by focusing‐defocusing: An outlook on seismic superresolution. Geophysics, 69(6), 1478–1490.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Klem‐Musatov, K.. (1994) Theory of seismic diffractions. Houston, TX: Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Li, C., & Zhang, J.. (2021) Velocity analysis using separated diffractions for lunar penetrating radar obtained by Yutu‐2 rover. Remote Sensing, 13(7), 1387.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Ling, J., Qian, R., Zhang, J., Ma, Z., & Liu, X.. (2024) GPR velocity correction method in transversely heterogeneous media based on CMP data. Near Surface Geophysics, 22 (Special Issue: Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Numerical Modelling Research and Practice), 255–264.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Novais, A., Costa, J., & Schleicher, J.. (2008) GPR velocity determination by image‐wave remigration. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 65(2), 65–72.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Powers, M.H.. (1997) Modeling frequency‐dependent GPR. The Leading Edge, 16(11), 1657–1662.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Reshef, M., & Landa, E.. (2009) Post‐stack velocity analysis in the dip‐angle domain using diffractions. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2008.00773.x
  32. Rothman, D.H., Levin, S.A., & Rocca, F.. (1985) Residual migration: Applications and limitations. Geophysics, 50(1), 110–126.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Sava, P., Biondi, B., & Etgen, J.. (2004) Diffraction‐focusing migration velocity analysis. https://scispace.com/pdf/diffraction‐focusing‐migration‐velocity‐analysis‐with‐23cnb9l8h3.pdf
  34. Schleicher, J., Costa, J., & Novais, A.. (2008) Time‐migration velocity analysis by image‐wave propagation of common‐image gathers. Geophysics, 73. VE161–VE171.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Schleicher, J., Costa, J., Santos, L., Novais, A., & Tygel, M.. (2009) On the estimation of local slopes. Geophysics, 74(4), P25–P33.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Schleicher, J., Novais, A., & Munerato, F.P.. (2004) Migration velocity analysis by depth image‐wave remigration: First results. Geophysical Prospecting, 52(6), 559–573.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Smitha, N., Ullas Bharadwaj, D., Abilash, S., Sridhara, S., & Singh, V.. (2016) Kirchhoff and f‐k migration to focus ground penetrating radar images. International Journal of Geo‐Engineering, 7(1), 4.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Travassos, J. d.M., Stael, G.C. & Liaudat, D.T. (2008) A GPR survey on degraded permafrost at Mesón San Juan, Mendonza, Argentina. Revista Brasileira de Geofísica, 26, 519–526.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Travassos, J.M., Martins, S.S., Potocki, M., & Simões, J.C.. (2021) Reconstruction of annual accumulation rate on firn, synchronising H2O2$\rm H_{2}O_{2}$ concentration data with an estimated temperature record. The Cryosphere, 15(7), 3495–3505.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Travassos, J.M., Martins, S.S., & Simoes, J.C.. (2022) A firn dielectric log depth‐tied to an ice core on the West Antarctica ice sheet. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 94(suppl 1), e20210815.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Travassos, J.M., Martins, S.S., Simões, J.C., & Mansur, W.J.. (2018) Radar diffraction horizons in snow and firn due to a surficial vertical transfer of mass. Brazilian Journal of Geophysics, 36(4), 507–518.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Virieux, J., Operto, S., Ben‐Hadj‐Ali, H., Brossier, R., Etienne, V., Sourbier, F., Giraud, L., & Haidar, A.. (2009) Seismic wave modeling for seismic imaging. The Leading Edge, 28(5), 538–544.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Yuan, H., Montazeri, M., Looms, M. C., & Nielsen, L.. (2019) Diffraction imaging of ground‐penetrating radar data. Geophysics, 84(3), H1–H12.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Zakarewicz, G., Maciel, S. T.R. & da Cunha, L.S. (2024) Systematic literature review on seismic diffraction imaging. Earth‐Science Reviews, 254, 104792.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhao, J., Yu, C., Peng, S., & Chen, Z.. (2019) Online dictionary learning method for extracting GPR diffractions. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 16(6), 1116–1123.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.70040
Loading
Velocity estimation in GPR data based on diffraction analysis: Methodology and application to Antarctic firn
Near Surface Geophysics 24, 170 (2026); https://doi.org/10.1002/nsg.70040
/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.70040
/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.70040
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): GPR; migration; plane wave destruction; residual diffraction moveout; velocity model

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error