Volume 46 Number 6
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478


Conventional finite‐difference modelling algorithms for seismic forward modelling are based on a time‐stepping scheme with a constant (global) time step. Large contrasts in the velocity model or in the spatial sampling rate cause oversampling in time for some regions of the model. The use of locally adjustable time steps can save large amounts of computation time for certain modelling configurations.  The computation of spatial derivatives across the transition zone between regions of the model with different temporal sampling requires the definition of the wavefield at corresponding time levels on both sides of the transition zone. This condition can be obtained by extrapolation in time, which is inaccurate, or by multiple time integration in the transition zone. The error in the latter solution is of the same order as the conventional time‐stepping scheme because both methods are based on the same iteration formula. The technique of multiple time integration simply requires the use of different sizes of time step. It is applicable only for certain factors of variation of the time step.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. CraseE.1990. High‐order (space and time) finite‐difference modeling of the elastic wave equation. 60th SEG meeting, San Francisco, USA. Expanded Abstracts, 987–991.
  2. DablainM.A.1986. The application of high‐order differencing to the scalar wave equation. Geophysics46, 54–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. FalkJ., TessmerE., GajewskiD.1996. Tube wave modeling by the finite‐difference method with varying grid spacing. Pure and Applied Geophysics46, 77–93.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. JastramC.1993. Seismische Modellierung mit Finiten Differenzen höherer Ordnung auf einem Gitter mit vertikal variierendem Gitterabstand. PhD thesis, University of Hamburg, Germany.
  5. LevanderA.R.1988. Fourth‐order finite‐difference P‐SV seismograms. Geophysics46, 1425–1436.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. VirieuxJ.1986. P‐SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media: velocity‐stress finite‐difference method. Geophysics46, 889–901.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error