1887
Volume 49, Issue 1
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

A method of compensating for the presence of discrete overburden velocity anomalies during depth conversion of time horizons interpreted on conventional, post‐stack time‐migrated seismic data is presented. Positive and negative time delays are estimated either from the push‐down or pull‐up of reflectors directly beneath the anomalies or from interpreted time thickness of the anomalous body and interval velocities estimated from well data. The critical steps are pre‐stack simulation of seismic acquisition across the velocity anomalies, incorporating the effects of a Fresnel volume which changes its width as a function of depth, and simulation of common‐midpoint (CMP) stacking using a linear regression of time delay, Δ, versus offset‐squared, 2. The time‐correction method predicts the time distortion for any target horizon and the distortion is removed as a correction in time. Depth conversion is then performed using a background velocity function. The final average velocity map is calculated from the resulting depth structure and the raw times at the target horizon. The method is implemented by manipulating time grids within an industry‐standard mapping package. The final average velocity map shows steep lateral velocity gradients which are constrained by the interpreted boundaries of the velocity anomalies.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00238.x
2001-12-21
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al‐ChalabiM.1979. Velocity determination from seismic reflection data. In: Developments in Geophysical Exploration Methods, Vol. 1 (ed. A.A.Fitch ), pp. 1–68. Applied Science Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BlackburnG.1980. Errors in stacking velocity – true velocity conversion over complex geologic situations. Geophysics45, 1465–1488.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BookerA.H., LinvilleA.F. & WasonC.B.1976. Long wavelength static estimation. Geophysics41, 939–959.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. CartwrightJ.1995. Seismic‐stratigraphical analysis of large‐scale ridge‐trough sedimentary structures in the late Miocene to early Pliocene of the central North Sea. In: Sedimentary Facies Analysis, pp. 285–303. International Association of Sedimentologists Special Publication No. 22. Blackwell Science Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. DobrinM.B. & SavitC.H.1988.Introduction to Geophysical Prospecting, 4th edn. McGraw‐Hill Book Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. GuptaV.K. & RamaniN.1980. Some aspects of regional‐residual separation of gravity anomalies in a Precambrian terrain. Geophysics45, 1412–1426.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. HoneymanW.1983. Near‐surface faulting effects on seismic reflection times. Geophysics48, 1140–1142.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. KallweitR.S. & WoodL.C.1982. The limits of resolution of zero‐phase wavelets. Geophysics47, 1035–1046.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. KunstF. & DezeJ.F.1985. The case history of a high‐resolution seismic survey in the central North Sea. 17th Annual Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas. OTC 4968, pp. 103–110.
  10. KvasnickaM. & ČervenýV.1994. Fresnel volumes and Fresnel zones in complex laterally varying structures. Journal of Seismic Exploration3, 215–230.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. MusgroveF.W.1994. Time variant statics corrections during interpretation. Geophysics59, 474–483.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. PickardJ.E.1992. Velocity modelling of a long‐period static anomaly, West Cameron Block 225, a Gulf of Mexico case history. Geophysics57, 420–430.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. SheriffR.E.1984.Encyclopedic Dictionary of Exploration Geophysics.Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, OK.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. TanerM.T. & BerkhoutA.J.1997. Statics, a physical view. 59th EAGE conference, Geneva, Switzerland, Extended Abstracts, A028.
  15. WingfieldR.T.R.1990. The origin of major incisions within the Pleistocene deposits of the North Sea. Marine Geology91, 31–52.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00238.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00238.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error