1887
Volume 49, Issue 3
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

The quantities measured in transient electromagnetic (TEM) surveys are usually either magnetic field components or their time derivatives. Alternatively it might be advantageous to measure the spatial derivatives of these quantities. Such gradiometer measurements are expected to have lower noise levels due to the negative interference of ambient noise recorded by the two receiver coils. Error propagation models are used to compare quantitatively the noise sensitivities of conventional and gradiometer TEM data. To achieve this, eigenvalue decomposition is applied on synthetic data to derive the parameter uncertainties of layered‐earth models. The results indicate that near‐surface gradient measurements give a superior definition of the shallow conductivity structure, provided noise levels are 20–40 times smaller than those recorded by conventional EM instruments. For a fixed‐wing towed‐bird gradiometer system to be feasible, a noise reduction factor of at least 50–100 is required. One field test showed that noise reduction factors in excess of 60 are achievable with gradiometer measurements. However, other collected data indicate that the effectiveness of noise reduction can be hampered by the spatial variability of noise such as that encountered in built‐up areas. Synthetic data calculated for a vertical plate model confirm the limited depth of detection of vertical gradient data but also indicate some spatial derivatives which offer better lateral resolution than conventional EM data. This high sensitivity to the near‐surface conductivity structure suggests the application of EM gradiometers in areas such as environmental and archaeological mapping.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00244.x
2001-12-21
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BartelD.C. & BeckerA.1988. Time‐domain electromagnetic detection of a hidden target. Geophysics53, 537–545.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BoernerD.E. & WestG.F.1989. A spatial and spectral analysis of the electromagnetic sensitivity in a layered earth. Geophysical Journal International98, 11–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BrzezowskiS.J. & HellerW.G.1988. Gravity gradiometer survey errors. Geophysics53, 1355–1361.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BuselliG. & O'NeillB.1977. SIROTEM: a new portable instrument for multichannel transient electromagnetic measurements. Bulletin of the Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists8, 82–87.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BuselliG., PikJ.P., HwangH.S.1998. AEM noise reduction with remote referencing. Exploration Geophysics29, 71–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. ChaveA.D.1984. The Frechet derivatives of electromagnetic induction. Journal of Geophysical Research89, 3373–3380.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. DraperN.R. & SmithH.1981.Applied Regression Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. EatonP.A. & HohmannG.W.1987. An evaluation of electromagnetic methods in the presence of geologic noise. Geophysics52, 1106–1126.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. GlennW.E. & WardS.H.1976. Statistical evaluation of electrical sounding methods, part I: experiment design. Geophysics41, 1207–1221.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. GolubG.H. & ReinschC.1970. Singular value decomposition and least squares solutions. Numerische Mathematik14, 403–420.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gomez‐TrevinoE. & EdwardsR.N.1983. Electromagnetic soundings in the sedimentary basin of southern Ontario – a case history. Geophysics48, 311–330.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. HoodP.J. & TeskeyD.J.1989. Aeromagnetic gradiometer program of the Geological Survey of Canada. Geophysics54, 1012–1022.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. InmanJ.R.1975. Resistivity inversion with ridge regression. Geophysics40, 798–817.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. JacksonD.D.1973. Marginal solutions to quasi‐linear inverse problems in geophysics: the edgehog method. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society35, 121–136.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. JohansenH.K.1977. A man/computer interpretation system for resistivity soundings over a horizontally stratified earth. Geophysical Prospecting25, 667–691.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. JonesA.G.1983. A passive natural‐source twin‐purpose borehole technique: Vertical Gradient Magnetometry (VGM). Journal of Geomagnetism and Geoelectricity38, 473–490.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. KaufmanA.A.1981. The influence of currents induced in the host rock on electromagnetic response of a spheroid directly beneath a loop. Geophysics46, 1121–1136.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. LamontagneY., MacnaeJ., PolzerB.1988. Multiple conductor modeling using program MULTILOOP. 58th SEG meeting, Anaheim, USA, Expanded Abstracts, Session: EM2.5.
  19. LaneR., GreenA., GoldingC., OwersM., PikP., PlunkettC., SattelD., ThornB.2000. An example of 3D conductivity mapping using the TEMPEST airborne electromagnetic system. Exploration Geophysics, 31, 162–172.
  20. LanczosC.1961.Linear Differential Operators.D. Van Nostrand Co., London.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. LinesL.R. & TreitelS.1984. Tutorial: a review of least‐squares inversion and its application to geophysical problems. Geophysical Prospecting32, 159–186.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. LiuG. & AstenM.1992. A comparison of airborne and ground transient EM systems in their resolving power against geological noise. Exploration Geophysics23, 197–200.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. PatellaD. & SiniscalchiA.1994. Two‐level magnetovariational measurements for the determination of underground resistivity distributions. Geophysical Prospecting42, 417–444.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. PressW.H., TeukolskyS.A., FlanneryB.P., VetterlingW.T.1989.Numerical Recipes in Pascal. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. RadicT.1994. Konzept einer RMS‐Apparatur zur Messung des oberflaechennahen spezifischen Widerstandes unter Anwendung des magnetischen Gradientenverfahrens im LW‐ und MW‐Frequenzbereich. In: Protokoll Ueber das Kolloquium ‘Elektromagnetische Tiefenforschung’ , Hoechst im Odenwald (eds K.Bahr and A.Junge ), pp. 470–479.
  26. RaicheA.P., JuppD.L.B., RutterH., VozoffK.1985. The joint use of coincident loop transient electromagnetic and Schlumberger sounding to resolve layered structures. Geophysics50, 1618–1627.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. SandbergS.K.1993. Examples of resolution improvement in geoelectrical soundings applied to groundwater investigations. Geophysical Prospecting41, 207–227.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. SharmaS.P. & KaikkonenP.1999. Appraisal of equivalence and suppression problems in 1D EM and DC measurements using global optimization and joint inversion. Geophysical Prospecting47, 219–249.DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2478.1999.00121.x
    [Google Scholar]
  29. SlackH.A., LynchV.M., LanganL.1967. The geomagnetic gradiometer. Geophysics32, 877–892.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. TarantolaA.1987.Inverse Problem Theory, Methods for Data Fitting and Model Parameter Estimation. Elsevier Science Publishing Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. VascoD.W.1989. Resolution and variance operators of gravity and gravity gradiometry. Geophysics54, 889–899.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. VozoffK. & JuppD.L.B.1975. Joint inversion of geophysical data. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society42, 977–991.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. WardS.H. & HohmannG.W.1987. Electromagnetic theory for geophysical applications. In: Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics, Vol. 1, Theory (ed. M.N.Nabighian ), pp. 53–129. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. WestG.F., MacnaeJ.C., LamontagneY.1984. A time‐domain EM system measuring the step response of the ground. Geophysics49, 1010–1026.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00244.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00244.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error