1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Geophysical Prospecting
  4. Volume 49, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 49, Issue 2
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

Spherical coordinates are a natural orthogonal system for describing wavefronts emanating from a point source. A regular grid distribution in the Cartesian‐coordinate system tends to undersample the wavefront description near the source (at the highest wavefront curvature) and oversample it away from the source. Spherical coordinates, in general, provide a more balanced grid distribution for characterizing point‐source wavefronts. Our numerical implementation confirms that the recently introduced fast marching algorithm is both a highly efficient and an unconditionally stable eikonal solver. However, its first‐order approximation of traveltime derivatives can induce relatively large traveltime errors for waves propagating in a diagonal direction with respect to the coordinate system. Examples, including the IFP Marmousi and the SEG/EAGE 3D salt‐dome models, show that a spherical‐coordinate implementation of the method results in far fewer errors in traveltime calculation than the conventional Cartesian‐coordinate implementation, and with practically no loss in computational advantages.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00245.x
2001-12-21
2024-04-25

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00245.x
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. CaoS. & GreenhalghS.A.1994. Finite‐difference solution of the eikonal equation using an efficient first‐arrival wavefront tracking scheme. Geophysics59, 632–643.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. FowlerP.J.1994. Finite‐difference solutions of the 3D eikonal equation in spherical coordinates. 64th SEG meeting, Los Angeles, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 1394–1397.
  3. GeoltrainS. & BracJ.1993. Can we image complex structures with first‐arrival traveltime?Geophysics58, 564–575.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. PopoviciM.1991. Finite‐difference traveltime maps. Stanford Exploration Project70, 245–256.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. QinF., LuoY., OlsenK.B., CaiW., SchusterG.T.1992. Finite‐difference solution of the eikonal equation along expanding wavefronts. Geophysics57, 478–487.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. SchneiderW.A., Jr.1993. Robust, efficient upwind finite‐difference traveltime calculations in 3D. 63rd SEG meeting, Washington, DC, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 1036–1039.
  7. SethianJ.A.1996. Level Set Methods . Cambridge University Press, New York.
  8. SethianJ.A. & PopoviciA.M.1999. Three‐dimensional traveltime computation using the fast marching method. Geophysics64, 516–523.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Van TrierJ. & SymesW.W.1991. Upwind finite‐difference calculation of traveltimes. Geophysics56, 812–821.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. VidaleJ.E.1990. Finite‐difference calculation of traveltimes in three dimensions. Geophysics55, 521–526.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00245.x
Loading
Implementing the fast marching eikonal solver: spherical versus Cartesian coordinates
Geophysical Prospecting 49, 165 (2001); https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00245.x
/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00245.x
/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00245.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error