1887
Volume 49, Issue 3
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

Perturbation methods are common tools for describing wave propagation in weakly anisotropic media. The anisotropic medium is replaced by an average isotropic medium where wave propagation can be treated analytically and the correction for the effect of anisotropy is computed by perturbation techniques. This works well for anisotropies of up to 10%. Some materials (e.g. shales), however, can exhibit a much stronger anisotropy. In this case a background is required which still can be treated analytically but is applicable to stronger P‐wave anisotropy. We present an averaging technique to compute a best‐fitting ellipsoidal medium to an arbitrary anisotropic medium. Ellipsoidal media are sufficiently simple for analytical expressions to be available for many applications and allow consideration of strong P‐wave anisotropy. The averaging of the arbitrary anisotropic medium can be carried out globally (i.e. for the whole sphere) or sectorially (e.g. for seismic waves propagating predominantly in the vertical direction). We derive linear relationships for the coefficients of the ellipsoid which depend on the elastic coefficients of the anisotropic medium. We also provide specifications for best‐fitting elliptical and best‐fitting isotropic media. Numerical examples for different rocks demonstrate the improved approximation of the anisotropic model obtained using the formulae derived, compared with the conventionally used average isotropic medium.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00256.x
2001-12-21
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BurridgeR., ChadwickP., NorrisA.N.1993. Fundamental elastodynamic solutions for anisotropic media with ellipsoidal slowness surfaces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A440, 655–681.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ČervenýV.1972. Seismic rays and ray intensities in inhomogeneous anisotropic media. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society29, 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. ČervenýV.1982. Direct and inverse kinematic problems for inhomogeneous anisotropic media – a linearization approach. Contributions of the Geophysical Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences13, 127–133.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. EttrichN.1998. FD eikonal solver for 3‐D anisotropic media. 68th SEG meeting, New Orleans,Expanded Abstracts, USA, 1957–1960.
  5. FedorovF.I.1968. Theory of Elastic Waves in Crystals . Plenum Press, New York.
  6. LecomteI.1993. Finite‐difference calculation of first traveltimes in anisotropic media. Geophysical Journal International113, 318–342.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. MenschT. & FarraV.1999. Computation of qP‐wave rays, traveltimes and slowness vectors in orthorhombic media. Geophysical Journal International138, 244–256.DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-246x.1999.00870.x
    [Google Scholar]
  8. PšenčíkI. & GajewskiD.1998. Polarization, phase velocity and NMO velocity of qP‐waves in arbitrary weakly anisotropic media. Geophysics63, 1754–1766.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. SayersC.M.1994. P‐wave propagation in weakly anisotropic media. Geophysical Journal International116, 799–805.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. ThomsenL.1986. Weak elastic anisotropy. Geophysics51, 1954–1966.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00256.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00256.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error