1887
Volume 49, Issue 3
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

In adapting the prestack migration technique used in seismic imaging to the inversion of ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) from time‐ to depth‐sections, we show that the theoretical integral formulation of the inversion can be applied to electromagnetic problems, albeit with three assumptions. The first two assumptions concern the electromagnetic characteristics of the medium, primarily that the medium must be perfectly resistive and non‐dispersive, and the third concerns the antennae radiation pattern, which is taken to be 2D. The application of this adaptation of the inversion method is confirmed by migrating actual GPR measurements acquired on the test site of the Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chaussées. The results show good agreement with the geometry of the structures in the medium and confirm that the possible departure from the assumption of a purely resistive medium has no visible effect on the information concerning the geometry of scattering and reflecting structures. The field experiments also show that prestack migration processing is sufficiently robust with regard to the assumption of a non‐dispersive medium. The assumption of a 2D antennae radiation pattern, however, produces artefacts that could be significant for laterally heterogeneous media. Nevertheless, where the medium is not highly laterally heterogeneous, the migration gives a clear image of the scattering potential due to the geometry of structural contrasts in the medium; the scatterers are well focused from diffraction hyperbolae and well localized. Spatial geometry has limited dimensional accuracy and positions are located with a maximum error equal to the minimum wavelength of the signal bandpass. Objects smaller than one wavelength can nevertheless be detected and well focused if their dielectric contrasts are sufficiently high, as in the case of iron or water in gneiss gravels. Furthermore, the suitability of multi‐offset protocols to estimate the electromagnetic propagating velocity and to decrease the non‐coherent noise level of measurements is confirmed. Our velocity estimation is based on the semblance calculation of multi‐offset migrated images, and we confirmed the relevance of this quantification method using numerical data. The signal‐to‐noise ratio is improved by summing multi‐offset results after the addition of random noise on measurements. Thus the adaptation of prestack migration to multi‐offset radar measurements significantly improves the resolution of the scattering potential of the medium. Limitations associated with the methods used here suggest that 3D algorithms should be applied to strongly laterally heterogeneous media and further studies concerning the waveform inversion are necessary to obtain information about the electric nature of the medium.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00258.x
2001-12-21
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AdlerF.1996. Tomographie de réflexion à partir des images migrées avant addition. PhD thesis, University of Pau et des Pays de l'Adour, France.
  2. BanoM.1996. Constant dielectric losses of ground‐penetrating radar waves. International Geophysical Journal124, 279–288.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BitriA. & GrandjeanG.1998. Frequency‐wavenumber modelling and migration of 2D GPR data in moderately heterogeneous dispersive media. Geophysical Prospecting46, 287–301.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BleisteinN.1987. On the imaging of reflectors in the earth. Geophysics52, 7931–7942.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BotelhoM.A., MuftiI.R., NetoV.P.1998. Multishot prestack depth migration: an application on real wide‐angle reflection and refraction GPR data. 68th SEG meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 1393–1396.
  6. ChazelasJ.L.1996.Création d'un Site Test pour les Méthodes Géophysiques Appliquées aux Travaux sans Tranchée. Rapport technique No. 12, Projet National Microtunnels, FSTT.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. ClaerboutJ.F.1970. Coarse grid calculations of waves in inhomogeneous media with application to delineation of complicated seismic structure. Geophysics35, 407–418.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. ClaerboutJ.F.1971. Toward a unified theory of reflector mapping. Geophysics36, 467–481.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. ClaerboutJ.F.1972. Downward continuation of moveout‐corrected seismograms. Geophysics37, 741–768.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. CohenJ.K. & StockwellJ.W., Jr.1997.CWP/SU: Seismic Unix Release 3: A free package for seismic research and processing. Center for Wave Phenomena, Colorado School of Mines, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. FisherE., McMechanG.A., AnnanA.P.1992a. Acquisition and processing of wide‐aperture ground‐penetrating radar data. Geophysics57, 495–504.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. FisherE., McMechanG.A., AnnanA.P., CoswayS.W.1992b. Examples of reverse‐time migration of single‐channel, ground‐penetrating radar profiles. Geophysics57, 577–586.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. GazdagJ.1978. Wave equation migration with the phase‐shift method. Geophysics43, 1342–1351.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. GrandjeanG., GourryJ.C., BitriA.2000. Evaluation of GPR techniques for civil‐engineering applications: study on a test site. Journal of Applied Geophysics45, 141–156.
  15. GreavesR.J., LesmesD.P., LeeJ.M., ToksözM.N.1996. Velocity variations and water content estimated from multi‐offset, ground‐penetrating radar. Geophysics61, 683–695.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. HagedoornJ.G.1954. A process of seismic reflection interpretation. Geophysical Prospecting2, 85–127.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. HollenderF., TillardS., CorinL.1999. Multifold borehole radar acquisition and processing. Geophysical Prospecting47, 1077–1090.DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2478.1999.00166.x
    [Google Scholar]
  18. JayaM.S., BotelhoM.A., HubralP., LiebhardtG.1999. Remigration of ground‐penetrating radar data. Journal of Applied Geophysics41, 19–30.DOI: 10.1016/s0926-9851(98)00035-4
    [Google Scholar]
  19. LeparouxD.1997. Mise au point de méthodes radar pour l'auscultation structurale et texturale de milieux géologiques très hétérogènes (Modélisation, Migration, Expérimentation). PhD thesis, University of Rennes 1 and Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chaussées, France.
  20. LinerC.L. & LinerJ.L.1995. Ground‐penetrating radar: a near‐face experience from Washington County, Arkansas. Leading Edge14, 17–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. MillerD., OristaglioM., BeylkinG.1987. A new slant on seismic imaging: migration and integral geometry. Geophysics52, 943–964.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. NobleM.S., MarssetB., MissiaenT., VersteegW.1996. Near surface 2D and 3D data processing: beyond stack. 58th EAGE conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Extended Abstracts, MO33.
  23. PattersonA.J., TealbyJ.M., AllinsonN.M.1995. GPR imaging with focused migration. 57th EAGE Conference, Glasgow, Scotland, Extended Abstracts, PO53.
  24. PodvinP. & LecomteI.1991. Finite difference computation of traveltimes in very contrasted velocity models: a massively parallel approach and its associated tools. International Geophysical Journal105, 271–284.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. SchneiderW.A.1978. Integral formulation for migration in two and three dimensions. Geophysics43, 49–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. StoltR.H.1978. Migration by Fourier transform. Geophysics43, 23–48.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. StolteC., RistowD., NickK.P.1994. Eccentricity‐migration for the imaging of pipes in radar reflection data. 56th EAEG meeting, Vienna, Austria, Extended Abstracts, IO14.
  28. TurnerG.1994. Subsurface radar propagation deconvolution. Geophysics59, 215–223.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. YoungR.A., DengZ., SunJ.1995. Interactive processing of GPR data. Leading Edge14, 275–280.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00258.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00258.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error