1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Geophysical Prospecting
  4. Volume 49, Issue 3
  5. Article
Volume 49, Issue 3
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

There is significant evidence that the anelastic loss of seismic energy is linked to petrophysical properties such as porosity, permeability and clay content. Thus, reliable estimation of anelastic attenuation from seismic data can lead to improved methods for the prediction of petrophysical properties. This paper is concerned with methods for the estimation of attenuation at sonic frequencies (5–30 KHz) from data. Two independent methods have been developed and tested for estimating compressional‐wave attenuation from full‐waveform sonic data. A well‐established technique, the logarithm spectral ratio (LSR) method, is compared with a new technique, the instantaneous frequency (IF) method. The LSR method uses the whole spectrum of the seismic pulse whilst the IF method uses a carefully estimated value of instantaneous frequency which is representative of the centre frequency of the pulse. In the former case, attenuation estimation is based on the relative variation of amplitudes at different frequencies, whilst in the latter case it is based on the shift of the centre frequency of the pulse to lower values during anelastic wave propagation. The IF method does not assume frequency independence of which is a necessary assumption for the LSR method, and it provides a stable frequency log, the peak instantaneous frequency (PIF) log, which may be used as an indicator for attenuation under certain limitations. The development and implementation of the two methods is aimed at minimizing the effect of secondary arrivals, such as leaky modes, and involved a series of parameter tests. Testing of the two methods using full‐waveform sonic data of variable quality, obtained from a gas‐bearing sandstone reservoir, showed that the IF method is in general more stable and suitable for full‐waveform sonic data compared with the LSR method. This was evident especially in data sets with high background noise levels and wave‐interference effects. For good quality data, the two methods gave results that showed good agreement, whilst comparison with other log types further increased confidence in the results obtained. A significant decrease (approximately 5 KHz) in the PIF values was observed in the transition from an evaporite/shale sequence to the gas‐bearing sandstone. Average values of 54 and 51 were obtained using good quality data from a test region within the gas‐saturated sandstone reservoir, using the LSR and IF methods, respectively.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00259.x
2001-12-21
2024-04-24

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00259.x
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AkiK. & RichardsP.G.1980.Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods. W.H. Freeman.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. BakerL.J. & WinbowG.A.1988. Multipole P‐wave logging in formations altered by drilling. Geophysics53, 1207–1218.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BarnesA.E.1991. Instantaneous frequency and amplitude at the envelope peak of a constant‐phase wavelet. Geophysics57, 1058–1060.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BarnesA.E.1993a. Instantaneous spectral bandwidth and dominant frequency with applications to seismic reflection data. Geophysics58, 419–428.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BarnesA.E.1993b. When the concepts of spectral frequency and instantaneous frequency converge. Leading Edge12, 1020–1023.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BiotM.A.1952. Propagation of elastic waves in a cylindrical bore containing fluid. Journal of Applied Physics23, 997–1005.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. BiotM.A.1956a. Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid saturated porous solid, 1. Lower frequency range. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America28, 168–178.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. BiotM.A.1956b. Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid saturated porous solid, 2. Higher frequency range. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America28, 179–191.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. ChengH.C., ToksözM.N., WillisM.E.1982. Determination of in situ attenuation from full waveform acoustic logs. Journal of Geophysical Research87, 5477–5484.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. DasiosA.1999. Computer techniques for in‐situ seismic attenuation studies and their applications. PhD thesis, University of Reading.
  11. DasiosA., AstinT.R., McCannC.1998a. Compressional‐wave attenuation from full‐waveform sonic data. 60th EAGE conference, Leipzig, Germany, Extended Abstracts, 10‐44.
  12. DasiosA., AstinT.R., McCannC.1998b. Peak instantaneous frequency (PIF): a proxy for attenuation from waveform sonic data. 60th EAGE conference, Leipzig, Germany, Extended Abstracts, P098.
  13. DvorkinJ. & NurA.1993. Dynamic poroelasticity: a unified model with the squirt and the Biot mechanisms. Geophysics58, 524–533.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. EngelhardL.1986. Determination of the attenuation of seismic waves from actual field data, as well as considerations to fundamental questions from model and laboratory measurements. In: DGMK‐ Forschungsbericht 254, Absorption Seismischer Wellen (ASM) (eds H.Burkhardt , J.Paffenholz and R.Schutt ), pp. 83–119. Deutsche Wiss. Gesellschaft für Erdol, Erdgas and Kohle, Hamburg.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. EngelhardL.1996. Determination of seismic‐wave attenuation by complex trace analysis. Geophysical Journal International125, 608–622.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. EngelhardL., GrossT., NeupertF.1984. Determination of in‐situ attenuation from full waveform acoustic logs – comment. Journal of Geophysical Research89, 3400–3402.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. GaborD.1946. Theory of communication. Proceedings of the Institute of Electrical Engineers93, 429–457.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. GoldbergD., MoosD., AndersonR.J.1985. Attenuation changes due to diagenesis in marine sediments. 26th Annual Logging Symposium, SPWLA, Paper KK.
  19. GoldbergD. & ZinsznerB.1989. P‐wave attenuation measurements from laboratory resonance and sonic waveform data. Geophysics54, 76–81.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. HarrisF.J.1978. On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with discrete Fourier transform. Proceedings of the IEEE66, 51–83.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. JonesS.M., AstinT.R., McCannC., SothcottJ.1997. The effect of the degree of saturation on ultrasonic velocity and attenuation in sandstones. 67th SEG meeting, Dallas, USA, Expanded Abstracts, P1023.
  22. KlimentosT.1995. Attenuation of P‐ and S‐waves as a method of distinguishing gas and condensate from oil and water. Geophysics60, 447–458.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. KlimentosT. & McCannC.1990. Relationships among compressional wave attenuation, porosity, clay content, and permeability in sandstones. Geophysics55, 998–1014.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. KusterG.T. & ToksözM.N.1974. Velocity and attenuation of seismic waves in two‐phase media: Part I. Theoretical formulations. Geophysics39, 587–606.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. MatheneyM.P. & NowackR.L.1995. Seismic attenuation values obtained from instantaneous‐frequency matching and spectral ratios. Geophysical Journal International123, 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. MavkoG.M. & NurA.1979. Wave attenuation in partially saturated rocks. Geophysics44, 161–178.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. PailletF.L. & ChengC.H.1986. A numerical investigation of head waves and leaky modes in fluid‐filled boreholes. Geophysics51, 1438–1449.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. PanC.1998. Spectral ringing suppression and optimal windowing for attenuation and Q measurements. Geophysics63, 632–636.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. PattonS.W.1988. Robust and least‐squares estimation of acoustic attenuation from well‐log data. Geophysics53, 1225–1232.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. PetersonE.W.1974. Acoustic wave propagation along a fluid filled cylinder. Journal of Applied Physics45, 3340–3350.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. PujolJ.1985. Vertical seismic profiling: data processing and interpretation, velocity determination and attenuation measurements. PhD thesis, University of Wyoming.
  32. PujolJ. & SmithsonS.1991. Seismic wave attenuation in volcanic rocks from VSP experiments. Geophysics56, 1441–1455.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. RoeverW.L., RosenbaumJ.H., ViningT.F.1974. Acoustic waves from an impulsive source in a fluid‐filled borehole. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America55, 1144–1157.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. SamsM.S.1991. High‐resolution velocity and attenuation logs from long‐spaced sonic data. Geophysics56, 1071–1080.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. SamsM. & GoldbergD.1990. The validity of Q‐estimates from borehole data using spectral ratios. Geophysics55, 97–101.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. TanerM.T., KoehlerF., SheriffR.E.1979. Complex seismic trace analysis. Geophysics44, 1041–1063.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. TangX. & StrackK.‐M.1995. Waveform inversion of seismic P‐wave attenuation from borehole compressional wave logs. 57th EAGE conference, Glasgow, Scotland, Extended Abstracts, P102.
  38. ThomsonD.J.1982. Spectrum estimation and harmonic analysis. Proceedings of the IEEE70, 1055–1096.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. WhiteR.E.1991. Properties of instantaneous seismic attributes. Leading Edge10, 26–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. WhiteR.E.1992. The accuracy of estimating Q from seismic data. Geophysics57, 1508–1511.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. WinklerK. & PlonaT.J.1982. Technique for measuring ultrasonic velocity and attenuation spectra in rocks under pressure. Journal of Geophysical Research87, 10776–10780.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00259.x
Loading
Compressional‐wave Q estimation from full‐waveform sonic data
Geophysical Prospecting 49, 353 (2001); https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00259.x
/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00259.x
/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00259.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error