1887
Volume 49, Issue 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

Many DC resistivity inversion schemes use a combination of standard iterative least‐squares and truncated singular value decomposition (SVD) to optimize the solution to the inverse problem. However, until quite recently, the truncation was done arbitrarily or by a trial‐and‐error procedure, due to the lack of workable guidance criteria for discarding small singular values. In this paper we present an inversion scheme which adopts a truncation criterion based on the optimization of the total model variance. This consists of two terms: (i) the term associated with the variance of statistically significant principal components, i.e. the standard model estimate variance, and (ii) the term associated with statistically insignificant principal components of the solution, i.e. the variance of the bias term. As an initial model for the start of iterations, we use a multilayered homogeneous half‐space whose layer thicknesses increase logarithmically with depth to take into account the decrease of the resolution of the DC resistivity technique with depth. The present inversion scheme has been tested on synthetic and field data. The results of the tests show that the procedure works well and the convergence process is stable even in the most complicated cases. The fact that the truncation level in the SVD is determined intrinsically in the course of inversion proves to be a major advantage over other inversion schemes where it is set by the user.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00264.x
2001-12-21
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. DahlinT.1993. On the automation of 2D resistivity surveying for engineering and environmental applications. PhD thesis, Lund University, Sweden.
  2. DempsterA., SchatzoffM., WermuthN.1977. A simulation study of alternatives to ordinary least squares. Journal of the American Statistical Association72, 77–106.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. HansenP.C.1990. Truncated singular value decomposition solutions to discrete ill‐posed problems with ill‐determined numerical rank. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing11, 503–518.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. HansenP.C.1992. Analysis of discrete ill‐posed problems by means of the L‐curve. SIAM Review34, 561–580.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. MenkeW.1989.Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory. International Geophysics Series 45. Academic Press.
  6. MuiuaneE.A. & PedersenL.B.1999. Automatic 1D interpretation of DC resistivity sounding data. Journal of Applied Geophysics42, 35–45.DOI: 10.1016/s0926-9851(99)00015-4
    [Google Scholar]
  7. PedersenL.B. & RasmussenT.M.1989. Inversion of magnetotelluric data: a non‐linear least‐squares approach. Geophysical Prospecting37, 669–695.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. RomigP.R.1986. Engineering and groundwater geophysics. Geophysics51 (Special Issue), 2621–2636.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. ScalesJ.A.1996. Uncertainties in seismic inverse calculations. In: Inverse Methods: Interdisciplinary Elements of Methodology, Computation and Applications (eds B.H.Jacobsen , et al.), pp. 79–97. Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences 63. Springer‐Verlag.
  10. SentiR.J.1988. Special report: Geophysical activity in 1987. The Leading Edge of Exploration7, 33–56.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Van DongenP. & WoodhouseM.1994.Finding groundwater: a project manager's guide to techniques and how to use them. Technical Report, UNDP–World Bank Water and Sanitation Programme.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. VogelC.R.1996. Non‐convergence of the L‐curve regularisation parameter selection method. Inverse Problems12, 535–547.DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/12/4/013
    [Google Scholar]
  13. XuP.1998. Truncated SVD methods for discrete linear ill‐posed problems. Geophysical Journal International135, 505–514.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00264.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00264.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error