1887
Volume 49, Issue 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

We have developed a three‐dimensional inverse scheme for carrying out DC resistivity surveys, incorporating complicated topography as well as arbitrary electrode arrays. The algorithm is based on the finite‐element approximation to the forward problem, so that the effect of topographic variation on the resistivity data is effectively evaluated and incorporated in the inversion. Furthermore, we have enhanced the resolving power of the inversion using the active constraint balancing method. Numerical verifications show that a correct earth image can be derived even when complicated topographic variation exists. By inverting the real field data acquired at a site for an underground sewage disposal plant, we obtained a reasonable image of the subsurface structures, which correlates well with the surface geology and drill log data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00269.x
2001-12-21
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BeasleyC.W. & WardS.H.1986. Three dimensional mise‐à‐la‐masse modelling applied to mapping fracture zones. Geophysics51, 98–113.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. CoggonJ.H.1971. Electromagnetic and electrical modelling by the finite element method. Geophysics36, 132–155.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. DeyA. & MorrisonH.F.1979. Resistivity modelling for arbitrarily shaped three dimensional structures. Geophysics44, 753–780.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. FoxR.C., HohmannG.W., KillpackT.J., RijoL.1980. Topographic effects in resistivity and induced‐polarization surveys. Geophysics45, 75–93.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. HolcombeH.T. & JiracekG.R.1984. Three‐dimensional terrain corrections in resistivity surveys. Geophysics49, 439–452.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. LiY. & OldenburgD.W.1992. Approximate inverse mappings in DC resistivity problems. Geophysical Journal International109, 343–362.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. MenkeW.1984. Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory. Academic Press, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. ParkS.K. & VanG.P.1991. Inversions of pole–pole data for 3D resistivity structure beneath arrays of electrodes. Geophysics56, 951–960.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. PetrickW.R.Jr, SillW.R., WardS.H.1981. Three dimensional resistivity inversion using alpha centers. Geophysics46, 1148–1163.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. SasakiY.1994. 3D resistivity inversion using the finite element method. Geophysics59, 1839–1848.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. TongL.T. & YangC.H.1990. Incorporation of topography into two‐dimensional resistivity inversion. Geophysics55, 354–361.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. TrippA.C., HohmannG.W., SwiftC.M.Jr.1984. Two‐dimensional resistivity inversion. Geophysics49, 1708–1717.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. YiM.‐J. & KimJ.‐H.1998. Enhancing the resolving power of the least‐squares inversion with active constraint balancing. 68th SEG meeting, New Orleans, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 485–488.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00269.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00269.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error