1887
ASEG2001 - 15th Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

We have used numerical modelling to improve understanding of seismic reflection in basalt covered regions. Our models are based on hydrocarbon prospects in the Denison Trough (Queensland, Australia).

Reflectivity modelling has been used to assess the influence of a range of model and source parameters. Models that include a single near-surface basalt layer generally result in relatively noise-free reflection signals, provided the basalt is reasonably attenuative. Reflection quality is poorest for models with buried high-velocity basalts, or for multi-layered basalts interspersed with lower-velocity material. Such models result in strong reverberatory noise, apparently propagating between the surface and basalt, or within the multi-layered basalts. In these situations, reflection strength is significantly improved if the source can be positioned below the basalt.

Finite-difference modelling permits analysis of models incorporating lateral variations in basalt geometry. Shot records generated with this approach exhibit basalt-related features seen routinely in real field data. Simple stacking of the finite-difference records indicates that reasonable sections can be obtained in areas of near-surface, or thin, basalts. Poorer stack quality is associated with thicker, buried basalts although deeper reflectors may be imaged by undershooting the basalt.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2001ab004
2001-12-01
2026-01-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Battig, E., 2000, Seismic wave propagation in basalt terrains: A numerical modelling approach: Hons. Thesis, Univ. of Qld.
  2. Hanssen, P., and Li, X., 1999, Modelling converted waves for sub-basalt imaging: EAGE 61st Ann. Meeting, Helsinki.
  3. Kelly, K., Ward, R, Trietel, S., and Alford, R., 1976, Synthetic seismograms: A finite-difference approach: Geophysics, 41, 2-27.
  4. Kennett, B.L.N., 1983, Seismic wave propagation in stratified media: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Mallick, S., and Frazer, L.N., 1987, Practical aspects of reflectivity modeling: Geophysics, 52, 1355-1364.
  6. Papworth, T.J., 1985, Seismic exploration over basalt covered areas in the UK: First Break, 3(4), 20-32.
  7. Peters, T. and Hearn, S., 2001, The influence of coal-mine geology on seismic data quality in the Bowen Basin: ASEG 15th Conference and Exhibition, Brisbane, (this volume).
  8. PujolJ., and Smithson, S., 1991, Seismic wave attenuation in volcanic rocks from VSP experiments: Geophysics, 56, 1441-1455.
  9. Sampson, C, Barton, P., and Karwatowski, J., 1995, Imaging below an opaque basaltic layer using densely sampled wide-angle OBS data: Geophys. Prospecting, 43, 509-527.
  10. Tompkins, M., and Christensen, N., 1999, Effects of pore pressure on compressional wave attenuation in a young oceanic basalt, Geophys. Res. Letters, 26, 1321-1325.
  11. Wombell, R., Jones, E., Priestly, D., and Williams, G., 1999, Long offset acquisition and processing for sub-basalt imaging: SEG 69th Annual Meeting, Houston.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2001ab004
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): basalt; finite-difference; modelling; reflectivity; Seismic
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error