1887
ASEG2001 - 15th Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

We have developed a simple approach to determine the depth and radius of subsurface cavities from the microgravity data. Horizontal location of cavity center is picked up by an algorithm as the projection of the minimum of gravity anomaly. Depth to the cavity center is determined using back propagation neural network. The cavity radius can be then calculated using the determined parameters if the density contrast between the host rock and the cavity filling materials is known or assumed according to the geological background. The present method is tested by several synthetic data sets and showed high ability to determine the cavity parameters in presence of natural noise. Applying the method to field data from Medford cavity site, Florida, the estimated cavity parameters are coincident the boring results. The method is proved to be fast and robust and can be used in field situation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2001ab036
2001-12-01
2026-01-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arzi, A. A. 1975, Microgravity for engineering applications: Geophs. Prosp., 23 408-425.
  2. Brown, M. P. and Poulton, M. M., 1996, Locating buried objects for environmental site investigations using Neural Networks: JEEG, 1, 179-188.
  3. Butler, D.K., Ed. 1977, Proc. of the symposium on detection of subsurface cavities: U.S Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, CE, Vicksburg, MS.
  4. Butler, D.K., 1983, Cavity detection research, Report 1, Micro gravimetric and magnetic surveys, Medford Cave Site, Florida: Tech. Rep.GL-83-1, U.S Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, CE, Vicksburg, MS.
  5. Butler, D.K., 1984, Microgravimetric and gravity gradient techniques for detection of subsurface cavities: Geophysics , 49, 1084-1096.
  6. Fajklewicz, Z., 1986., Origin of the anomalies of gravity and its vertical gradient over cavities in brittle rock: Geophys. Prosp., 4(8), 1233-1254.
  7. Franklin, A. G., Patrick, D. M., Butler, D. K., Strohm, W. E., and Hynes-Griffin, N. E., 1980, Foundation considerations in setting of nuclear facilities in karst terrains and other areas susceptible to ground collapse: UREG/CR-2062, U. S. Nucl. Reg. Commission, Washington, D. C.
  8. Hebb. D., 1949, The organization of behavior: Jhn Wiley & Sons Inc.
  9. Li, Y., and Oldenburg, D.W., 1996, 3-D inversion of magnetic data: Geophysics, 61, 394-408.
  10. McCulloch, W., and Pitts, W., 1943, A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity: Bull of Mathematical Biophysics, 5, 115-133, in Anderson, J., and Rosenfield, C, Eds., Neuro-computing: foundations of research: M.I.T. Press, 18-28.
  11. Owen, T. E., 1983, Detection and mapping of tunnels and caves: Developments, in Geophysical Exploration Methods, A. A. Fitch (ed.), Vol. 5, 161-258 Applied Science Publishers Ltd.
  12. Rosenblatt. F.,1958, The perception: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain: Psychological Review, 65, 386-408.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2001ab036
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): cavities; microgravity; neural network
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error