1887
ASEG2001 - 15th Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

A large number of geophysical inversion methods have been published, but there are no published efficient technique applied to either of MMR or TFMMR data. One of the important aspect of inverting TFMMR data is its dependence on all three components of the anomalous magnetic field. In the case of inverting TFMMR data using gradient methods, we propose a preprocessing reduction of data to the pole to overcome the problems of the effect of the geomagnetic field direction and dependency of the TFMMR data on all three components. By doing this, we invert the data only using the sensitivity of the vertical anomalous magnetic field. After formulating the expressions for computing the Frechet derivatives for the anomalous vertical component on a homogeneous half space model, the Marquart-Levenberg method (damped least squares method) incorporating the quasi-Newton approximation for updating the Jacobian matrix in successive iterations is employed. As the most time consuming task in inversion process is to calculate the Frechet derivatives, therefore employing such scheme will considerably reduce the computing time and improve the stability of the inversion. An analytical solution for calculating the Frechet derivatives in wavenumber domain for all mesh nodes component for a homogeneous half space model is developed first. Next for recovering 2-D models, every 4 by 3 element in the x and z directions respectively constitute a resistivity block. This block parametrisation allows for recovering the sharp resistivity contrasts which occur in mineral exploration prospecting or shallow surface experiments. Assuming a linear variation of transformed electric potential and its gradient over the boundary of the elements, we may derive the discretised form of derivative equations. The efficiency and accuracy of the proposed scheme is demonstrated using a set of synthetic data from a double vertical dike model.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2001ab039
2001-12-01
2026-01-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Edwards, R. N., Lee, H. & Nabighian, M. N., 1978. On the theory of magnetometric resistivity (MMR) method. Geophysics, vol.43, 1176-1203.
  2. Ellis, R. G. & Oldenburg, D. W., 1999. Applied geophysical inversion. Geophys. J. Int., vol. 116, 5-11.
  3. Fathianpour, N. & Cattach, M. K., 1995. Analytical Solutions for the Total Field Magnetometric Resistivity (TFMMR) Technique. Exploration Geophysics, vol. 26, 158-166.
  4. Loke, M. H. & Barker, R. D., 1995, Least-Squares deconvolution of apparent resistivity pseudosections, Geophysics, vol. 60, 1682-1690.
  5. McGillivray, P. R. & Oldenburg, D. W., 1990. Methods for calculating Frechet derivatives and sensitivities for the nonlinear inverse problem: A comparative study. Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 38, 499-524.
  6. Park, S. K. & Van, G. P., 1991. Inversion of pole-pole data for 3-D resistivity structure beneath arrays of electrodes. Geophysics, vol. 56, 951-960.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2001ab039
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Frechet derivatives; Inversion; Marquart-Levenberg; Quasi-Newton; TFMMR
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error