1887
ASEG2001 - 15th Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

In the last fifty years, the advances in shallow refraction seismology have been very modest. There have been few developments comparable to CMP, digital processing, or the 3D methods of reflection seismology.

The most critical requirement is the development of an efficacious method for digital processing using the complete seismic refraction trace. Digital processing is an essential requirement for deriving more information from existing data as well as for efficient handling of the increased volumes of data typical of most 3D surveys.

The refraction convolution section (RCS) is a new method for the digital processing of seismic refraction data. It can result in more detailed geological models of the subsurface through the convenient use of amplitudes as well as traveltimes. It also facilitates the examination of important issues such as signal-to-noise ratios, the resolution of ambiguities in refractor models, 3D refraction methods and azimuthal anisotropy, signal processing to enhance second and later events and stacking data in a manner similar to CMP reflection methods.

The RCS provides an effective domain for the advancement of shallow refraction seismology using the model provided by seismic reflection technology.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2001ab102
2001-12-01
2026-01-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Gunn, P., ed, 1997, Thematic issue: airborne magnetic and radiometric surveys, AGSO Journal of Australian Geology and Geophysics, 17(2), 1-216.
  2. Lanz, E., Maurer H., and Green, A. G., 1998, Refraction tomography over a buried waste disposal site: Geophysics, 63, 1414-1433.
  3. Mayne, W. H., 1962, Common-reflection-point horizontal data-stacking techniques: Geophysics, 27, 927-938.
  4. Nestvold, E. O., 1992, 3-D seismic: is the promise fulfilled?: The Leading Edge, 11, 12-19.
  5. Palmer, D., 1980, The generalized reciprocal method of seismic refraction interpretation: Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
  6. Palmer, D., 1986, Refraction seismics: the lateral resolution of structure and seismic velocity: Geophysical Press.
  7. Palmer, D, 2000a, Comments on "A brief study of the generalized reciprocal method and some of the limitations of the method" by Bengt Sjogren, Geophysical. Prospecting, submitted.
  8. Palmer, D, 2000b, Can new acquisition methods improve signal-to-noise ratios with seismic refraction techniques?: Exploration Geophysics, 31, 275-300.
  9. Palmer, D, 2001a, Imaging refractors with the convolution section, Geophysics, in press.
  10. Palmer, D, 2001b, Resolving refractor ambiguities with amplitudes, Geophysics, in press.
  11. Walker, C. S., and Win, M. A., 1997, A new standard in the practice of engineering seismic refraction, in McCann, D. M., Eddleston, M., Fleming, P. J., and Reeves, G. M., eds., Modern geophysics in engineering geology: The Geological Society, 391-398.
  12. Weimar. P., and Davis, T. L., 1996, Applications of 3-D seismic data to exploration and production, Geophysical Developments Series, no. 5: Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
  13. Yilmaz, O, 1988, Seismic data processing: Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
  14. Zhang, J., and Toksoz, M. N., 1998, Nonlinear refraction traveltime tomography: Geophysics, 63, 1726-1737.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2001ab102
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): 3D; amplitudes; anisotropy; RCS; refraction
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error