1887
ASEG2001 - 15th Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

An algorithm is described that determines, models and classifies spatially discrete anomalies in airborne EM (AEM) data sets. The first module scans segments of EM profiles for anomalies wide enough to have their origin in the subsurface and narrow enough to be caused by a discrete conductor. Next, background conductivity models are determined with layered-earth inversions from the spatially smoothed EM data. Finally, the identified EM anomalies are modelled first with rectangular current filaments in free-space and then with magnetic dipoles buried inside a layered-earth. The approach used takes into account the effect of overburden blanking and is applicable for discrete, sheet-like conductors inside a resistive host, i.e. in scenarios where vortex currents dominate. Computing the current-excitation ratio for each solution monitors the validity of this assumption. The model parameters determined from each data segment include the target conductor position, depth, dip, size and conductance. The method is fully automated with the filament start model being determined by curve matching from a digital look-up table. Results from synthetic data indicate the efficiency and reliability of the method. Automated anomaly modelling of TEMPEST data acquired across the Bull Creek prospect, Queensland, provides a sensible description of the main mineralisation and indicates the presence of other minor conductors.

© ASEG 2001
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2001ab128
2001-12-01
2026-01-16

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2001ab128
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barnett, C.T., 1984, Simple inversion of time-domain electromagnetic data: Geophysics 49, 925-933.
  2. Boyd G.W. and Wiles, C.J., 1984, The Newmont drill-hole EMP system - examples from eastern Australia: Geophysics 49, 949-956.
  3. Duncan, A.C., Interpretation of down-hole transient EM data using current filaments, Exploration Geophysics 18, 36-39.
  4. Dyck, A.V., Bloor, M. and Vallee, M.A., 1980, User manual for programs PLATE and SPHERE: Research in Applied Geophysics, 14, University of Toronto.
  5. Hart, J. and Lane, R., 2001, Comparison of airborne and ground TEM systems for a conductor beneath conductive cover – an example from northwest Queensland, Australia: Exploration Geophysics (this issue).
  6. Hoversten, G.M. and Becker, A., 1995, EM1DSH with EMMODEL a Motif GUI, Numerical Modeling of multiple thin 3D sheets in a layered earth, University of California at Berkeley Engineering Geoscience.
  7. Lamontagne, Y.L., 1975, Applications of wide-band, time-domain, EM measurements in mineral exploration: Ph.D. Thesis, University of Toronto.
  8. Lamontagne, Y., Macnae, J. and Polzer, B., 1988, Multiple conductor modeling using program MULTILOOP: 58th Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts.
  9. Lane, R., Green. A., Golding, C, Owers, M., Pik, P., Plunkett, C, Sattel, D. and Thorn, B., 2000, An example of 3D conductivity mapping using the TEMPEST AEM system: Exploration Geophysics 31, 162-172.
  10. Lines, L.R. and Treitel, S., 1984, Tutorial: a review of least-squares inversion and its application to geophysical problems: Geophysical Prospecting 32, 159-186.
  11. Liu, G. and Asten, M.W., 1993, Fast approximate solutions of transient EM response to a target buried beneath a conductive overburden: Geophysics 58, 810-817.
  12. Macnae, J., King, A., Stolz, N., Osmakoff, A. and Blaha, A., 1998, Fast AEM data processing and inversion: Exploration Geophysics 29, 163-169.
  13. Palacky, G.J., 1978, Selection of a suitable model for quantitative interpretation of towed-bird AEM measurements: Geophysics 43, 576-587.
  14. Raiche, A.P., 1997, LEROI-AIR, modelling program for sponsors of Australian Minerals Industry Research Association Project P223C.
  15. Sattel, D., 1998, Conductivity information in three dimensions: Exploration Geophysics 29, 157-162.
  16. Sattel, D., 2001, The application of Zohdy’s method to AEM data: Exploration Geophysics (this issue).
  17. Smith, R.S., and Annan, A.P., 1997, Advances in airborne time-domain EM technology: in Gubins, A.G, ed., Proceedings of Exploration 97: Fourth Decennial International Conference on Mineral Exploration, 497-504.
  18. Walker, P.W. and West, G.F., 1992, Parametric estimators for current excitation on a thin plate: Geophysics 57, 766-773.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2001ab128
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Airborne electromagnetics; current filaments; layered-earth inversion; magnetic dipoles; TEMPEST

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error