1887
ASEG2001 - 15th Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

The moments of a sphere in a uniform field can be used to approximately model the moments of a sphere in a dipolar field. The numerical computations are trivial and the approximation is especially good for higher-order moments. The greatest discrepancy is seen on the zeroth-order moment at large radii, however, the zeroth-order moment is not commonly used for interpreting airborne electromagnetic data.

The sphere in a uniform field can also be used to approximate the response of a body that has its currents constrained to flow in a specific dip plane. This means that plate-like bodies or anisotropic spheres can also be modelled.

The third-order moment of MEGATEM� data acquired over the Reid-Mahaffy test site shows an anomalous response than can be modelled by a sphere at 170 m depth with a conductivity of 15 S/m and a radius of 40 m. The currents flowing in the sphere are constrained to flow in a vertical plane. This model is consistent with the geology of the area and a hole drilled to test the anomalous zone.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2001ab133
2001-12-01
2026-01-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abramowitz, M., and Stegun, I. A., 1965, Handbook of mathematical functions: Dover Publications.
  2. Debye, P., 1909, Der lichtdruck auf kugeln von beliebigern material: Ann. D. Phys. 30, 57.
  3. Grant, F. S., and West, G. F., 1965, Interpretation theory in applied geophysics: McGraw Hill.
  4. Irvine, R. J., Godbout, M. G., and Witherly, K. E., 2000, "Reid-Mahaffy field guide": comparison of airborne EM systems, Reid-Mahaffy test site: Condor Consulting Inc., Report No. 2000-5.
  5. Lee, T., 1975, Transient electromagnetic response of a sphere in a layered medium: Geophysical Prospecting, 23,492-512.
  6. Lodha, G. S. and West, G. F., 1976, Practical airborne EM (AEM) interpretation using a sphere model: Geophysics, 41, 1157-1169.
  7. Macnae, J., King, A., Stolz, N., Osmakoff, A. and Blaha, A., 1998, Fast AEM data processing and inversion: Exploration Geophysics, 29, no. 1/2, 163-169.
  8. Macnae, J., King, A., Stolz, N., and Klinkert, P., 1999, 3-D EM inversion to the limit: in Oristaglio, M. and Spies, B., Eds., Three-dimensional electromagnetics, Soc. Expl. Geophys., Geophysical Development Series, 7, 489-501.
  9. Macnae, J. C, Smith, R., Polzer, B. D., Lamontagne, Y. and Klinkert, P. S., 1991, Conductivity-depth imaging of airborne electromagnetic step-response data: Geophysics, 56, 102-114.
  10. March, H. W., 1953, The field of a magnetic dipole in the presence of a conducting sphere: Geophysics, 18, 671-684.
  11. Nabighian, M. N., 1971, Quasi-static transient response of a conducting permeable two-layer sphere in a dipolar field: Geophysics, 36, 25-37.
  12. Ontario Geological Survey, 2000, Airborne magnetic and electromagnetic surveys, Reid-Mahaffy airborne geophysical test site survey; Ont. Geol. Surv., Misc. Release - Data (MRD)-55.
  13. Palacky, G. J. and West, G. F., 1973, Quantitative interpretation of input AEM measurements: Geophysics, 38, 1145-1158.
  14. Smith, R. S., 2000a, The realizable resistive limit: A new concept for mapping geological features spanning a broad range of conductances: Geophysics, 65, 1124-1127.
  15. Smith, R. S., 2000b, Three consequences of removing the primary field from fixed-wing time-domain airborne electromagnetic data: quantitative modelling, estimating bird position, detecting perfect conductors: Geophysical Prospecting, submitted.
  16. Smith, R. S. and Lee, T. J., 2000, The moments of the impulse response: a new paradigm for the interpretation of transient electromagnetic data: submitted to Geophysics.
  17. Wait, J. R., 1982, Geoelectromagnetism: Academic Press.
  18. Walker, P. W. and West, G. F., 1991, A robust integral equation solution for electromagnetic scattering by a thin plate in conductive media: Geophysics, 56, 1140-1152.
  19. Watson, G. N., 1944, A treatise on the theory of Bessel function: Cambridge University Press.
  20. Wolfgram, P. and Karlik, G., 1995, Conductivity-depth transform of GEOTEM data: Exploration. Geophysics, 26, 179-185. (* Discussion in Exploration Geophysics, 26, 549.)
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2001ab133
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): airborne; electromagnetics; modelling; moments; sphere
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error