1887
ASEG2001 - 15th Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Fixed-wing transient airborne electromagnetic methods are now capable of measuring the on-time response and accurately estimating the three components of the primary field. Using the primary fields as the input to an inversion algorithm, it is possible to determine the offset of the receiver sensor (bird) from the transmitting loop. The result is a dynamic and continuing measure of system geometry that can be used to augment data processing and interpretation schemes.

Independent estimates of the offsets using a laser range finder show that the primary-field estimates are accurate at high altitudes away from any ground effect. Because laser range finders cannot be employed practically at survey altitude, the primary-field method can also be used to obtain a dynamic estimate of the bird position close to the ground. Typically, the bird position is confined to within a few metres of the mean position when using a bird and/or tow cable with reasonably high coefficients of drag. Empirical observation suggests that the estimated positions are not significantly effected by the ground response, and are therefore good estimates.

In one example, the dynamic positions are used as input to a conductivity/depth estimation algorithm and compared with the results obtained when using only the nominal bird position. The results are comparable.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2001ab134
2001-12-01
2026-01-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Macnae, J.C., Smith, R., Polzer, B.D., Lamontagne, Y., and Klinkert, P.S., 1991, Conductivity-depth imaging of airborne electromagnetic step-response data: Geophysics, 56, 102-114.
  2. Palacky, G.J., and West, G.F., 1991, Airborne electromagnetic methods: in Nabighian, M.N., Ed., Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics - volume 2, application, part A and B: Soc. Expl. Geophys., Inv. in Geophys. 3, 811-879.
  3. Annan, A.P., 1983, Effect of differential transmitter/receiver motion on airborne transient EM interpretation: Presented at the 53r Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstract, 622-623.
  4. Annan, A.P., 1984, Compensation of towed bird AEM system data for differential transmitter-receiver motion: Presented at the 54' Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstract, 80-81.
  5. Green, A., 1998, Altitude correction of time domain AEM data for image display and geological mapping using the apparent dipole depth (ADD) method: Exploration Geophysics, 29, 87-91.
  6. Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T., and Flannery, B.P., 1992, Numerical Recipes in C: the art of scientific computing: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Smith, R.S., 1999, On the airborne transient EM response of a magnetic anomaly: Exploration Geophysic, 30, 157-160.
  8. Stolz, E.M., and Macnae, J., 1998, Evaluating EM waveforms by singular-value decomposition of exponential basis functions: Geophysics, 63, 64-74.
  9. Wolfgram, P., and Karlik, G, 1995, Conductivity-depth transform of GEOTEM data: Explor. Geophys., 26, 179-185.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2001ab134
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error