1887
3D Electromagnetics
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Magnetotelluric (MT) tensors have significantly different forms depending on whether the subsurface is one-dimensional (ID), two-dimensional (2D) or three-dimensional (3D). In subsurface geological structures that are not ID, two-dimensionality is often assumed, as inversion routines for 2D earth models are computationally more tractable than those for full 3D media. In 2D, the MT tensor decouples into two independent modes, the transverse electric (TE) mode and the transverse magnetic (TM) mode. Often only one of these modes is acquired during commercial operations.

Field data were collected over an elongate magnetic anomaly of a type that would normally be approximated as 2D but which has a finite strike length and is therefore a 3D body. With this in mind, the applicability of interpreting data defined as TE and TM were assessed using (a) Mohr circles galvanic distortion analyses, (b) determination of strike of local and regional geology, and (c) comparison of 2D inversion techniques. The data were collected with the Mount Isa Mines Distributed Acquisition System (MIMDAS) in the Deep Well prospect of the Curnamona Province in South Australia. We show that the TM mode accurately delineates boundaries and that since boundary-charges are included in the inversion formulation, it also provides accurate values of apparent resistivity. The TE mode provides poor boundary delineation and underestimates the resistivity of the 3D body. Joint inversions provide only a small improvement upon TM-only inversions, but determination of dimensionality, strike and detection of galvanic distortion mean that collection of both data modes is still preferable.

© ASEG 2003
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2003_3DEMab002
2003-04-01
2026-01-13

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2003_3DEMab002
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agarwal, A. K., Poll, H. E. and Weaver, J. T, 1993, One- and two-dimensional inversion of magnetotelluric data in continental regions: Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 81, 155-176.
  2. Bahr, K., 1988, Interpretation of the magnetotelluric impedance tensor: Regional induction and local telluric distortion: Journal of Geophysics 62, 119-127.
  3. Chave, A. D., Thomson, D. J. and Ander, M. E., 1987, On the robust estimation of power spectra, coherences, and transfer functions: Journal of Geophysical Research, 92, 633-648.
  4. Chave, A. D., and Thomson, D. J., 1989, Some comments on magnetotelluric response function estimation: Journal of Geophysical Research 94, 14215-14225.
  5. Chave, A. D., and Smith, J. T., 1994, On electric and magnetic galvanic distortion tensor decomposition: Journal of Geophysical Research 99, 4669-4682.
  6. Conor, C. H. H., 2000, Definition of major sedimentary and igneous units of the Olary Domain, Curnamona Province: MESA Journal 19,51-56.
  7. Conor, C. H., 2001, Geology of the Olary Domain, Curnamona Province, South Australia: Primary Industries and Resources South Australia, 1-15.
  8. Constable, S. C, Parker, R. L. and Constable, C. G., 1987, Occam’s inversion: a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from EM sounding data: Geophysics 52, 289-300.
  9. deGroot-Hedlin, C. and Constable, S., 1990, Occam’s inversion to generate smooth, two-dimensional models from magnetotelluric data: Geophysics 55, 1613-1624.
  10. Egbert, G. E., 1997, Robust multiple-station magnetotelluric data processing: Geophysical Journal International 130, 475-496.
  11. Gamble, T. D., Goubau, W. M. and Clarke, J., 1979, Magnetotellurics with a remote reference: Geophysics 44, 53-68.
  12. Garner, S. J. and Thiel, D. V., 2000, Broadband (ULF-VLF) surface impedance measurements using MIMDAS: Exploration Geophysics 31, 173-178.
  13. Groom, R. W., and Bailey, R. C, 1989, Decomposition of magnetotelluric impedance tensors in the presence of local three-dimensional galvanic distortion: Journal of Geophysical Research 94, 1913-1925.
  14. Groom, R. W., and Bailey, R. C, 1991, Analytic investigations of the effects of near-surface three-dimensional galvanic scatterers on MT tensor decompositions: Geophysics 51,496-518.
  15. Jones, A. G., 1983, The problem of current channelling: A critical review: Geophysical Surveys 6, 79-122.
  16. Li, Y and Oldenburg, D. W., 1996, 3D inversion of magnetic data: Geophysics 61, 394-408.
  17. Lilley, F. E. M., 1976, Short Note: Diagrams for magnetotelluric data: Geophysics 41, 766-770.
  18. Lilley, F. E. M., 1993a, Magnetotelluric analysis using Mohr circles: Geophysics 58, 1498-1506.
  19. Lilley, F. E. M., 1993b, Three-dimensionality of the BC87 magnetotelluric data set studied using Mohr circles: J. Geomag. Geoelectr. 45, 1107-1113.
  20. Lilley, F. E. M., 1995, Strike direction: obtained from basic models for 3D magnetotelluric data, in: Oristaglio, M. and Spies, B., eds, Three-Dimensional Electromagnetics, Schlumberger-Doll Research, 359-369.
  21. Lilley, F. E. M., 1998a, Magnetotelluric tensor decomposition: Part 1, Theory for a basic procedure: Geophysics 63, 1885-1897.
  22. Lilley, F. E. M., 1998b, Magnetotelluric tensor decomposition: Part 2, Examples of a basic procedure: Geophysics 63, 1898-1907.
  23. Luenberger, D. G., 1984, Linear and nonlinear programming, 2nd Ed.: Addison-Wesley Publ. Co.
  24. Madden, T. R. and Mackie, R. L., 1993, Three-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion using conjugate gradients: Geophysical Journal International, 115, 215-229.
  25. Means, W. D., 1990, Review paper: Kinematics, stress, deformation and material behaviour: Journal of Structural Geology 12, 953-971.
  26. Patra, H. P. and Mallick, K., 1980, Geosounding Principles, 2 time-varying geoelectric soundings: Elsevier, pp 449 .
  27. Polak, E., 1971, Computational methods in optimisation: A unified approach: Academic Press.
  28. Rodi, W. and Mackie, R. L., 2001, Nonlinear conjugate gradients algorithm for 2-D magnetotelluric inversion: Geophysics 66, 174-187.
  29. Sheard, S. N., 1998, MIMDAS - a new direction in geophysics, 13th bi-annual conference, Australian Society of Exploration Geophysics: Abstracts, Preview 76, 104. Swift, C. M. Jr., 1971, Theoretical magnetotelluric and turam response from two-dimensional inhomogeneities: Geophysics 36, 38-52.
  30. Telford, W. M., Geldart, L. P., and Sheriff, R. E., 1990, Applied Geophysics, Second Edition: Cambridge University Press.
  31. Vozoff K., 1991, The magnetotelluric method, in Nabighian, M. N., (ed.), Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics -Applications Part A and Part B: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 641-713.
  32. Wang, L.J, Lilley, F.E.M. and Chamalaun, F.H., 1997, Large-scale electrical conductivity structure of Australia from magnetometer arrays: Exploration Geophysics 28, 150-155.
  33. Wannamaker, P. E., Hohmann, G. W. and Ward, S. H., 1984a, Magnetotelluric responses of three-dimensional bodies in layered earths: Geophysics 49, 1517-1533.
  34. Wannamaker, P. E., Hohmann, G. W., and San Filipo, W. A., 1984b, Electromagnetic modelling of three-dimensional bodies in layered earths using integral equations: Geophysics 49, 60-74.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2003_3DEMab002
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): dimensionality; galvanic distortion; inversion; Magnetotellurics

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error