1887
3D Electromagnetics
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Accurate and efficient modeling of three-dimensional (3D) electromagnetic (EM) scattering remains an open challenge in the presence of anisotropic conductive media. Numerical algorithms used to simulate the response of dipping and anisotropic rock formations can easily exceed standard computer resources as EM fields become fully coupled in general.

In the past, several scattering approximations have been developed to efficiently simulate complex EM problems arising in the probing of subsurface rock formations. These approximations include the Born, Rytov, Extended Born (ExBorn) and quasi-linear (QL) methods, among others. However, so far none of these approximations have been adapted to simulate scattering in the presence of anisotropic conductive media. In this paper, we describe and benchmark a novel EM scattering approximation that remains accurate and efficient in the presence of 3D anisotropic conductive media. The approximation is based on the integral formulation of EM scattering and takes advantage of the spatial smoothness and general vectorial properties of EM fields internal to scatterers. A general vectorial formulation is used to properly account for complex EM coupling due to anisotropy.

Several numerical examples borrowed from borehole induction logging are used to describe and assess the accuracy and efficiency of the new EM scattering approximation. The approximation allows one to accurately simulate the EM response of more than 1 million cells within a few minutes of CPU time on a serial computer with standard memory and speed resources.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2003_3DEMab007
2003-04-01
2026-01-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Born, M., 1933, Optics: Springer-Verlag, New York.
  2. Catedra, M.F., Torres, R.P., Basterrechea, J., and Gago, E., 1995, The CG-FFT method: Application of signal processing techniques to electromagnetics. Boston: Artech House.
  3. Fang, S. Gao, G-Z. and Torres-Verdin, C, 2003, Three-dimensional electromagnetic anisotropy modeling using integral equations, 3DEM-3 workshop, this volume.
  4. Fang S., and Wang, T., 2000, Accurate Born simulation of induction response using an optimal background, SEG Expanded Abstract, Calgary, pp. 1806-1809.
  5. Gao, G-Z. , Torres-Verdín, C, Habashy T. M. and Fang S., 2002a, Numerical simulation of array induction tools with novel approximations based on an integral equation formulation, 2nd Annual Conference Report on Formation Evaluation, The University of Texas at Austin.
  6. Gao, G-Z., Torres-Verdín, C, Habashy, T. M, and Fang, S., 2002b, Approximations to electromagnetic scattering based on natural preconditioners of the method-of-moments‘ stiffness matrix: applications to the probing of subsurface rock formations, presented at 2002 IEEE AP-S Internat. Symp. URSI Radio Science Meeting, San Antonio, TX, June 16-21.
  7. Gerard, L.G. Sleijpen and Diederik R. Fokkema, 1993, BiCGSTAB(l) for linear equations involving unsymmetric matrices with complex spectrum, Electronic Transactions on Numerical Analysis, Vol. 1, pp.11-32.
  8. Gianzero, S., 1999, The paradox of anisotropy revisited, The Log Analyst, Vol. 40, No. 6, pp.485-491
  9. Habashy, T.M, Groom, R.W. and Spies, B., 1993, Beyond the Born and Rytov approximations: A nonlinear approach to electromagnetic scattering, J. Geophys. Res., Vol. 98, pp.1759-1775.
  10. Hohmann, G.W., 1971, Electromagnetic scattering by conductors in the earth near a line source of current: Geophysics, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 101-131.
  11. Hohmann, G.W, 1975, Three-dimensional induced polarization and electromagnetic modeling: Geophysics, Vol. 40, No.2, pp. 309-324.
  12. Hohmann, G.W., 1983, Three-dimensional EM modelling, Geophys. Surv., Vol. 6, pp.27-53.
  13. Klein, J.D, Martin, P.R., and Allen, D.F., 1997, the petrophysics of electrically anisotropic reservoirs: The Log Analyst, May-June, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp.25-36.
  14. Liu Q.H., Zhang, Z.Q., Xu, X.M., 2001, The hybrid extended Born approximation and CG-FFT method for electromagnetic induction problems, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 39, No. 2 .
  15. Moran, J.H. and Gianzero, S., 1979, Effects of formation anisotropy on resistivity-logging measurements: Geophysics, Vol. 44, No. 7, P.1266-1286.
  16. Torres-Verdín, C. and Habashy, T.M., 2001, Rapid numerical simulation of axisymmetric single-well induction data using the extended Born approximation, Radio Science, Vol. 36, No. 6.
  17. Torres-Verdín, C. and Habashy, T.M., 1994, Rapid 2.5-dimensional forward modeling and inversion via a new nonlinear scattering approximation, Radio Science, Vol. 29, No. 4, P1051-1079.
  18. Wang T. and Fang S., 2001, 3-D electromagnetic anisotropy modeling using finite differences, Geophysics Vol. 66, No.5 pp.1386-1398.
  19. Wannamaker, P.E., Hohmann, G.W., SanFilipo, W.A., 1983, Electromagnetic modelling of three-dimensional bodies in layered earths using integral equations, Geophysics, Vol. 49, No. 1, pp. 60-74.
  20. Xiong, Z., 1992, Electromagnetic modeling of 3-Dstructures by the method of system iteration using integral equations: Geophysics,Vol. 57, No. 12, P.1556-1561.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2003_3DEMab007
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): 3D electromagnetic scattering; anisotropy; approximation; integral equation
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error