1887
3D Electromagnetics
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Topographic effects are known to influence electromagnetic (EM) field measurements, but are rarely taken into consideration in interpretation. In this paper, 3-D modelling and inversion schemes that allow topography to be included are presented. The modelling method is based on a staggered-grid finite difference method that uses the biconjugate gradient method preconditioned with an incomplete Cholesky decomposition to solve the system of equations. In addition, to accelerate the solution, the static divergence correction procedure is used. This proves to be essential in dealing with extremely high conductivity contrasts between the earth and air. Model examples include magnetotelluric, controlled-source ground EM, and airborne EM responses to 3-D hills. The accuracy of the scheme is demonstrated by comparison with 2-D finite-element and semi-analytical solutions. Once modelling of topographic responses is possible, it becomes easy to modify existing inversion algorithms so that topography can be incorporated. Synthetic examples for ground and airborne EM surveys show that the inversion recovers the resistivity structures well with little influence from topography.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2003_3DEMab013
2003-04-01
2026-01-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Endo, M. and Noguchi, K., 1999, Three-dimensional modeling considering the topography for the case of time-domain electromagnetic method: 2n Intern. Symp. on Three-Dimensional Electromagnetics, 53-56.
  2. Fraser, D., 1978, Resistivity mapping with an airborne multicoil electromagnetic system: Geophysics, 43, 144-172.
  3. Hordt, A. and Muller, M., 2000, Understanding LOTEM data from mountainous terrain: Geophysics, 65, 113-1123.
  4. Ku, C.C., Hsieh, M.S., and Lim, S.H., 1973, The topographic effect in electromagnetic fields: Can. J. Earth Sci., 10, 645-656.
  5. Liu, G., and Becker, A., 1992, Evaluation of terrain effects in AEM surveys using the boundary element method: Geophysics, 57, 272-278.
  6. Mackie, R.L., Smith, J.T., and Madden, T.R., 1994, Three-dimensional electromagnetic modeling using finite difference equations: the magnetotelluric example: Radio Science, 29, 923-935.
  7. Mitsuhata, Y., 2000, 2-D electromagnetic modeling by finite-element method with a dipole source and topography: Geophysics, 65, 465-474.
  8. Newman, G.A., and Alumbaugh, D.L., 1995, Frequency-domain modeling of airborne electromagnetic responses using staggered finite differences: Geophysical Prospecting, 43, 1021-1042.
  9. Raiche, A., Annetts, D., and Sugeng, F., 2001, EM target response in complex hosts: 15th Conference, ASEG, Brisbane, Extended Abstracts.
  10. Reddig, R.P., and Jiracek, G.R., 1984, Topographic modeling and correction in magnetotellurics: 54th Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Explor. Geophys.; abstracts and biographies, 44-47.
  11. Sasaki, Y., 2001, Full 3-D inversion of electromagnetic data on PC: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 46, 45-54.
  12. Smith, J.T., 1996, Conservative modeling of 3-D electromagnetic fields, Part II: Biconjugate gradient solution and an accelerator: Geophysics, 61, 1319-1324.
  13. Ting, S.C. and Hohmann, G.W., 1981, Integral equation modeling of three-dimensional magnetotelluric response: Geophysics, 182-197.
  14. Wannamaker, P.E., Stodt, J.A., and Rijo, L, 1986, Two-dimensional topographic responses in magnetotellurics modeled using finite elements: Geophysics, 51, 2131-2144.
  15. Yee, K.S., 1996, Numerical solution of initial boundary problems involving Maxwell’s equations in isotropic media: IEEE Transactions on Antennae and Propagation, AP-14, 302-309.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2003_3DEMab013
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error