1887
ASEG2003 - 16th Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

The trend towards higher flight height and loose-drape fixed wing surveys has important implications for high-resolution aeromagnetic surveys for mineral exploration, especially for targets such as kimberlites. The IAGSA specifications, implemented by leading airborne geophysical contractors and some Governments, make it virtually impossible to acquire adequate data in areas of even moderate relief using conventional aircraft. Variations in survey elevation give rise to changes in magnetic relief and magnetic texture that are not related to magnetic sources but are simply artifacts produced by varying depth-to-source. Important high frequency and low amplitude magnetic signals are absent in areas of high survey elevation and cannot be recovered by drape corrections which involve intrinsically unstable downward continuation.

Geophysicists are well aware of the loss of horizontal spatial resolution as survey elevation increases but the loss of subtle information on depth extent is even more serious in exploration for pipe-like bodies such as kimberlites. Aeromagnetic data are relatively insensitive to depth extent because of the rapid decay of the kernel function with depth. At shallow depths there is a clear difference in anomaly shape between a pipe source and a thin sheet but as depth-to-source increases these differences become much less obvious.

For cost-effective high-resolution aeromagnetic surveys for kimberlites we need to fly tight-drape surveys at low level, using aircraft designed to fly at low level such as the Pacific Aerospace Cresco and Fletcher FU-24. The terrain following ability of these aircraft is impressive.

Comparison of loose-drape and tight-drape data shows a dramatic improvement in high frequency content for tight-drape surveys with both magnetic relief and magnetic texture of small local anomalies being preserved. The loose-drape examples show significant variations in magnetic texture due entirely to variations in survey elevation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2003ab030
2003-08-01
2026-01-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Cordell, L., 1985, Techniques, applications and problems of nalytical continuation of New Mexico aeromagnetic data between arbitrary surfaces of very high relief: Proceedings of the International meeting on potential fields in rugged topography, Institute of Geophysics, University of Lausanne, Switzerland, Bulletin 7, 96-99.
  2. Cordell, L. and Grauch, V.J.S., 1985, Mapping basement magnetization zones from aeromagnetic data in the San Juan basin, New Mexico: in Hinze, W.J., Ed., The utility of regional gravity and magnetic maps. Society of Exploration Geophysicists. 181-197.
  3. Flis, M.F. and Cowan, D.R., 2000. Aeromagnetic drape corrections applied to the Turner Syncline, Hamersley Basin: Exploration Geophysics, 31, 84-88.
  4. Li, Y. and Oldenburg, D.W., 1996, 3-D inversion of magnetic data: Geophysics, 61, 394-408.
  5. Pilkington, M., and Roest, W.,1992, Draping aeromagnetic data in areas of rugged topography: Jour. Appl. Geophys., 29, 135-142
  6. Pilkington, M., 1998, Magnetisation mapping in rugged terrain: Exploration Geophysics, 29, 560-564.
  7. Pilkington, M., and Thurston, J.B., 2001, Draping corrections for aeromagnetic data:line- versus grid-based approaches: Exploration Geophysics, 32, 95-101
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2003ab030
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Aeromagnetics; depth extent; drape corrections; source resolution
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error