1887
ASEG2003 - 16th Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Numerical experiments have been performed to test three inversion schemes for the imaging of surface seismic data. Three shallow subsurface models were considered: buried karst topography, dipping blocks, and isolated waste ponds. The synthetic experiments involved only a limited number of ‘surveys’ with just 8, 3, or 1 shots into variable length geophone arrays. In all cases, conventional seismic data processing hardly recovers the structure.

The inversion algorithm works in the frequency domain and relies on a finite element method to do the 2D/2.5D acoustic wave modelling. Our original inversion scheme used the known source signature (KSS), whereas the other two schemes either estimate it from the various shot gathers (ESI), or perform a normalised data inversion (NDI). The spectral inversions typically worked over 50-400 Hz and involved about 3500 data points. The features in the models typically have dimension of 5-20 m, which can be compared with the geophone spread length of 40 m (8 shots) to 100 m (3 or 1 shots).

The 8 shot inversion performed best for all the models. In fact, it was not possible to recover the karst structure with just 1 or 3 shots, but the other models were recovered, albeit with less accuracy, using such a small number of shots. ESI and NDI perform remarkably well on the dipping block and waste pond models. KSS yielded superior results to the other two schemes. The estimated source spectra were close to but did not exactly match the known wavelets.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2003ab060
2003-08-01
2026-01-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Pratt, R. G. and Goulty, N. R., 1991, Combining wave-equation imaging with traveltime tomography to form high-resolution images from crosshole data: Geophysics, 56, 208-224.
  2. Pratt, R. G., 1999, Seismic waveform inversion in the frequency domain, Part 1: Theory and verification in a physical scale model: Geophysics, 64, 888-901.
  3. Pratt, R. G., and Shipp, R. M., 1999, Seismic waveform inversion in the frequency domain, Part 2: Fault delineation in sediments using crosshole data: Geophysics, 64, 902-914.
  4. Torleif, D. and Zhou, B., 2002, A numerical comparison of 2D resistivity image with ten electrode arrays: Near Surface Geophysics (in press).
  5. Williamson P. R., and Pratt, R. G., 1995, A critical review of the acoustic wave modeling procedure in 2.5 dimensions: Geophysics, 60, 591-595.
  6. Wu Ru-shan and Toksoz, M., N., 1987, Diffraction tomography and multisource holography applied to seismic imaging: Geophysics, 52, 11-25.
  7. Zhou B. and Greenhalgh, S.A., 1998a, Composite boundary-valued solution of 2.5-D Green’s function for arbitrary acoustic media: Geophysics, 63, 1813-1823.
  8. Zhou B. and Greenhalgh, S.A., 1998b, Crosshole acoustic velocity imaging with full-waveform spectral data: 2.5-D numerical simulations: Exploration Geophysics, 29, 680-684.
  9. Zhou, B. and Greenhalgh, 2002, Crosshole seimic inversion with normalized full-waveform amplitude data: Geophysics, (in press).
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2003ab060
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): acoustic wave; amplitude inversion; frequency domain; Seismic imaging
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error