1887
ASEG2003 - 16th Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

This paper reports the results of analysing AEM data where the same flight line has been flown repeatedly to monitor system performance.

When these data are corrected for the effects of variable survey altitude they provide a good measure of the reproducibility of AEM data. The analysis has been conducted for both frequency and time domain systems and shows that, where the area is even moderately conductive, multiplicative errors will provide the dominant source of noise for AEM surveys. Errors typically have standard deviations of 2 % and can easily induce fluctuations of 10%. Moreover, because of their geometric origins, these errors are highly correlated between channels. Frequency domain HEM and Z component time domain systems produce errors that are largely unrelated to time/frequency/conductivity. This is not the case for X component data from asymmetric systems.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2003ab093
2003-08-01
2026-01-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Lane, R., Green, A., Golding, C, Owers, M., Pik, P., Plunkett, C, Sattel, D., and Thorn, B., 2000, An example of 3D conductivity mapping using the TEMPEST airborne electromagnetic system: Exploration Geophysics, 31, 162-172.
  2. York, D., 1966, Least-square fitting of a straight line: Canadian Journal of Physics, 44, 1079-1086.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2003ab093
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): AEM; Noise
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error