1887
ASEG2003 - 16th Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Existing surface wave modelling methods fail to correctly interpret some critical engineering scenarios, for example Earth models comprising 'soft' under 'hard' layers. Numerical and experimental repeatability analyses and the use of synthetic seismograms to reproduce the field data exactly, accounting for all superposed modes, leads to a better understanding of resolution and accuracy of the inversion results.

An inversion scheme based on the observation of an 'effective mode' phase velocity, whilst employing realistic error envelopes, has proved more successful than conventional methods, and demonstrated the need for array length at least 2.5 times the depth of investigation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2003ab119
2003-08-01
2026-01-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Buchen, P. W. and Ben-Hador, R., 1996, Free-mode surface-wave computations: Geophysical Journal International, 124, 869-887.
  2. Forbriger, T., 2001, Inversion flachseismischer Wellenfelder: Ph.D. Thesis, Universitat Stuttgart. http://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/opus/volltexte/2001/861
  3. Foti, S. and Strobbia, C, 2002, Some notes on model parameters for surface wave data inversion: SAGEEP, Expanded Abstracts.
  4. Lai, C. G. and Rix, G. J., 1998, Simultaneous inversion of Rayleigh phase velocity and attenuation for near-surface site characterization: Georgia Institute of Technology. http://www.ce.gatech.edu/~grix/surface_wave.html
  5. Lai, C. G. and Rix, G. J., 1999, Inversion of multi-mode effective dispersion curves: in Pre-failure deformation characteristics of geomaterials, eds. M. Jamiolkowski, R. Lancellotta and D. Lo Presti, 411-418.
  6. Mchaels, P. and Smith, R. B., 1997, Surface wave inversion by neural networks (radial basis functions) for engineering applications: Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 2 (1), 65-76.
  7. Miiller, G., 1985, The reflectivity method: a tutorial: Journal of Geophysics, 58, 153-174.
  8. Rix, G. J. and Leipski, E. A., 1991, Accuracy and resolution of surface wave inversion: in Recent advances in instrumentation, data acquisition and testing in soil dynamics, eds. Shobia K. Bhatia and Geoffrey W. Blaney, American Society of Civil Engineers, 17-32.
  9. Roth, M. and Holliger, K., 1999, Inversion of source-generated noise in high-resolution seismic data: The Leading edge, 18(12), 1402-1406.
  10. Sanchez-Salinero, I., Roesset, Y. M., Shao, K.-Y., Stokoe II, K. H. and Rix, G. J., 1987, Analytical evaluation of variables affecting surface wave testing of pavements: Transportation Research Record 1136, 86-95.
  11. Schwab, F. A. and Knopoff, L., 1972, Fast surface wave and free mode computations: in Methods in computational physics, ed. Bruce A. Bolt, 87-180.
  12. Szelwis R. and Behle, A., 1986, Shallow shear-wave velocity estimation from multimodal Rayleigh waves: in Shear-wave exploration, eds. S. H. Danbom and S. N. Domenico, 214-226.
  13. Tokimatsu, K., Tamura, S. and Kojima, H., 1992, Effects of multiple modes on Rayleigh wave dispersion: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 118 (2), 1529-1543.
  14. Tuomi, K. E. and Hiltunen, D. R., 1996, Reliability of the SASW method for determination of the shear modulus of soils: in Uncertainty in geologic environments: from theory to practice (Uncertainty 96), American Society of Civil Engineers, 1225-123.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2003ab119
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): engineering; inversion; layered-earth; shear wave; surface waves; synthetic seismograms
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error