1887
ASEG2003 - 16th Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

A field instrument and analysis method was developed to estimate the vertical distribution of hydraulic conductivity, in shallow unconsolidated aquifers. The field method uses fluid injection ports and four pressure transducers in a hollow auger that measure the hydraulic head outside the auger at several distances from the injection point. A constant injection rate is maintained for a duration time sufficient for the system to become steady state. The novelty of this method lies in the fact that is determined while the drill string is in the ground and the change in hydraulic head is monitored in the same drill stem. Dense vertical sampling and the application of four transducer offsets provide a detailed resolution of the vertical variability in hydraulic conductivity. Exploiting the analogy between electrical resistivity in geophysics and hydraulic flow, data are processed with a 1-D inversion algorithm for the pole-pole resistivity method resulting in models consistent with the known geology.

The injection methodology, conducted in three separate drilling operations, was investigated for repeatability, reproducibility, linearity, and for different injection sources. Repeatability tests, conducted at ten levels, demonstrated spreads of generally less than 10%. Reproducibility tests conducted in three closely spaced drilling operations showed a spread of less than 20%, which may be due to lateral variations in hydraulic conductivity. Linearity tests, made to determine dependency on flow rates, showed no indication that the applied flow rate biased the measurements given the uncertainty of repeated measurements. In order to obtain estimates of the hydraulic conductivity by an independent means, a series of measurements were made by injecting water through screens installed at two separate depths in a monitoring pipe near the measurement site.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2003ab129
2003-08-01
2026-01-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Christensen, N.B., and Auken, E., 1992. Simultaneous Electromagnetic Layered Model Analysis. In: B. H. Jacobsen (Editor), Proceedings of the Interdisciplinary Workshop 1. University of Aarhus, Denmark, GeoSkrifter 41, 49-56.
  2. Freeze, R.A., and Cherry, J.A., 1979. Groundwater. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
  3. Hess, K.M., Wolf, S.H., Celica, M.A, 1992. Large scale natural gradient tracer test in sand and gravel, Cape Cod, Massachusetts. 3. Hydraulic conductivity variability and calculation of macrodispersivities. Water Resources Research, 28 (8), 2011-2027.
  4. Houmark-Nielsen, M., 1987. Pleistocene Stratigraphy and Glacial History of the Central Part of Denmark. Bull, of the Geological Society of Denmark, 36 (1 & 2).
  5. Sørensen,, K.I., 1989. A method for measurement of the electrical formation resistivity while auger drilling. First Break, 7 (10), 403-407.
  6. Telford, W.M., Geldart, L.P., and Sheriff, R.E., 1995. Applied Geophysics. Cambridge University Press, New York.
  7. Viessman, W., Lewis, G.L., and Knapp, J.W., 1989. Introduction to Hydrology. Harper & Row, New York.
  8. Zlotnik, V.A., and Zurbuchen, B.R., 1998. Dipole Probe: Design and Field Applications of a Single-Borehole Device for Measurements of Vertical Variations of Hydraulic Conductivity. Ground Water, 36 (6), 884.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2003ab129
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): hydraulic conductivity; hydrology; inversion; resistivity
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error