In Situ Stress Field, Fault Reactivation and Seal Integrity in the Bight Basin, South Australia

Scott D. Reynolds; Richard R. Hillis; Evelina Paraschivoiu

doi:10.1071/ASEG2003ab141

ISSN: 2202-0586
E-ISSN:

oa In Situ Stress Field, Fault Reactivation and Seal Integrity in the Bight Basin, South Australia
Authors Scott D. Reynolds^a, Richard R. Hillis^b and Evelina Paraschivoiu^c
View Affiliations Hide Affiliations

^a NCPGG,, Australia, [email protected] ^b NCPGG,, Australia, [email protected] ^c PIRSA,, Australia, [email protected]
Publisher: Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists
Source: ASEG Extended Abstracts, Volume 2003, Issue ASEG2003 - 16th Geophysical Conference, Aug 2003, p. 1 - 5
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/ASEG2003ab141
- Published online: 01 Aug 2003

Abstract

The in situ stress field and consequent risk of reactivation has been evaluated in the Bight Basin in order to assess the risk of fault seal breach at seismically mapped prospects. Borehole breakouts interpreted from dipmeter and image logs in five wells in and around the Bight Basin indicate a 130°N maximum horizontal stress orientation. The large variation in water depths across the Bight Basin required the use of effective stress magnitudes. A depth-stress power relationship is used to define the effective vertical stress based on density log data from 10 wells. The effective minimum horizontal stress was estimated at 6 MPa/km using effective pressures from leak-off tests. An upper bound (18.7 MPa/km) for the effective maximum horizontal stress was determined using frictional limits to stress. Pore pressure in wells in the region is hydrostatic except in Greenly 1 where over pressure occurs below a depth of 3600 m.

The risk of fault reactivation in the Bight Basin was evaluated using the FAST technique. The risk of fault reactivation and consequent seal breach is expressed in terms of the pore pressure increase that would be required to induce failure for three different in situ stress cases. In all three cases faults striking 40°N (+15°) of any dip are the least likely to be reactivated.

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2003ab141

2003-08-01

2026-01-21

From This Site

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2003ab141

dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword

-contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution

10

5

Full text loading...

References

Finkbeiner, T., Zoback, M., Flemings, P. & Stump, B., 2001, Stress, pore pressure, and dynamically constrained hydrocarbon columns in the South Eugene Island 330 field, northern Gulf of Mexico: AAPG Bulletin, 85, 1007-1031.
Gaarenstroom, L., Tromp, R. A. J., Jong, M. C. D. & Brandenburg, A. M., 1993, Overpressures in the Central North Sea: implications for trap integrity and drilling safety: In Petroleum Geology of Northwest Europe. Proceedings of the 4th Conference (ed Parker, J. R.), pp. 1305-1313, Geological Society London.
Hillis, R. R., 1998, Mechanisms of dynamic seal failure in the Timor Sea and Central North Sea Basins: In The Sedimentary Basins of Western Australia 2. Proceedings of the Petroleum Exploration Society of Australia Symposium, Perth Western Australia (eds Purcell, P. G. & Purcell, R. R.), pp. 313-324.
Ludwig, W. J., Nafe, J. E. & Drake, C. L, 1970, Seismic Refraction: In The Sea: Ideas and Observations on Progress in the Study of the Seas, Vol. 4, New Concepts of Sea Floor Evolution (ed Maxwell, A. E.), pp. 53-84, Wiley-Interscience, New York.
Mildren, S. D., Hillis, R. R. & Kaldi, J., 2002, Calibrating predictions of fault seal reactivation in the Timor Sea: APPEA Journal, 42, 187-202.
Sibson, R. H., 1994, Crustal stress, faulting and fluid flow. In: Geofluids: Origin, Migration and Evolution of Fluids in Sedimentary Basins (ed Parnell, J.), pp. 69-84, Geological Society, London.
Somerville, R., 2001, The Ceduna Sub-basin - A snapshot of prospectivity: APPEA Journal, 41, 321-346.
Zoback, M. L., 1992, First- and second-order patterns of stress in the lithosphere: The world stress map project: Journal of Geophysical Research, 97, 11703-11728.

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2003ab141

Article Type: Research Article

Keyword(s): Bight Basin; fault reactivation; stress field

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

- Inversion of data from electrical imaging surveys in water-covered areas
  
  Authors M. H. Loke and J. W. Lane
- Inversion of Magnetic Data from Remanent and Induced Sources
  
  Authors Robert G. Elllis, Barrry de Wet and Ian N. Macleod
- A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2-D electrical imaging surveys
  
  Authors M. H. Loke, Ian Acworth and Torleif Dahlin
- Designing matched bandpass and azimuthal filters for the separation of potential-field anomalies by source region and source type
  
  Authors Jeffrey D. Phillips
- Bad Colour Maps Hide Big Features and Create False Anomalies
  
  Authors Peter Kovesi
- Practical 3D EM inversion – the P223F software suite
  
  Authors Art Raiche, Fred Sugeng and Glenn Wilson
- Estimating Noise Levels in AEM Data
  
  Authors Andy Green and Richard Lane
- Target delineation using Full Tensor Gravity Gradiometry data
  
  Authors Colm A. Murphy and James Brewster
- Transdimensional Monte Carlo Inversion of AEM Data
  
  Authors Ross C Brodie and Malcolm Sambridge
- The geotech VTEM time domain helicopter em system
  
  Authors Ken Witherly, Richard Irvine and Edward Morrison
More Less

oa In Situ Stress Field, Fault Reactivation and Seal Integrity in the Bight Basin, South Australia

Abstract

Most Read This Month

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed