1887
ASEG2003 - 16th Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

We present a system for inverting geological models in cases where there are no established numerical criteria to act as inversion targets. The method of interactive evolutionary computation provides for the inclusion of qualitative geological expertise within a rigorous mathematical inversion scheme, by simply asking an expert user to visually evaluate a sequence of model outputs. The traditional numerical misfit is replaced by a human appraisal of misfit. A genetic algorithm provides optimal convergence into the target parameter space, while optimising an ensemble of solutions, so that the non-uniqueness of the problem may be explored. In order to facilitate analysis of the results, we employ a visualisation technique known as self-organised mapping to represent the parameter space covered by the numerous model outputs. The result is a simple view of an otherwise complicated multi-dimensional problem. A user may infer much about the controlling parameters in the model through a few graphical displays of the data.

The potential of this interactive inversion and visualisation technique is demonstrated when we invert a geody-namic model for a conceptual pattern of fault spacing during crustal extension. We also present an example where the interactive scheme is linked to a numerical inversion of induced polarisation data. In this case, we are exploring for the numerical inversion parameters which lead to a particular geological output.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2003ab184
2003-08-01
2026-01-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bellingham, P., White, N., 2000. A general inverse method for modelling extensional sedimentary basins. Basin Research 12,219-226.
  2. Boschetti, F., Dentith, M., List, R., 1996. Inversion of seismic refraction data using genetic algorithms. Geophysics 61 (6), 1715-1727.
  3. Byerlee, J. D., 1968. Brittle-ductile transition in rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research 73, 4741-1750.
  4. Cross, T., Lessenger, M., 1999. Construction and application of a stratigraphic inverse model. In: Harbaugh, J., Watney, W., Rankey, E., Slingerland, R., Goldstein, R., Franseen, E. (Eds.), SEPM Special Publication 62: Numerical Experiments in Stratigraphy: Recent Advances in Stratigraphic and Sedimentologic Computer Simulations. SEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology), pp. 69-83.
  5. Goldberg, D., 1989. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 412 pp.
  6. Kohonen, L, 2001, Self-organizing maps: 3rd Edition, New York, Springer, Series in Information Sciences, v. 30, 501 p.
  7. Moresi,L., Aug. 1999. Ellipsis, http://www.ned.dem.csiro.au/research/solidMech/PIC.
  8. Moresi, L., Dufour, F., Miihlhaus, H.-B., 2002. Mantle convection models with viscoelastic/brittle lithosphere: Numerical methodology and plate tectonic modeling. Pure and Applied Geophysics 159,2335-2356.
  9. Takagi, H., 2001. Interactive evolutionary computation: Fusion of the capacities of EC optimization and human evaluation. Proceedings of the IEEE 89 (9), 1275-1296.
  10. Tarantola, A., 1987. Inverse Problem Theory. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 613 pp.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2003ab184
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error