1887
ASEG2003 - 16th Geophysical Conference
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

In this paper, we would like to examine the applicability of the time-lapse seismic reflection survey to the geothermal reservoir monitoring.

Akinomiya geothermal area, Akita pref. Japan is the study area where four-month steam production test was performed. The baseline and monitoring surveys were conducted just after and one year after the test. Because the maximum reservoir pressure difference and minimum seasonal difference are satisfied simultaneously.

We find the similarity and difference in the results of the baseline and monitoring surveys which suggests the large scale geology and the change occurred in the reservoir, respectively.

We also demonstrate the possibility of the simple 3-D survey named "handy 3-D. In the survey, vibrator shot points are located on the roads and the reservoirs are deployed as 3-D patch. If it is successful, number of the seismic reflection surveys carried out in the mountainous areas will be encouraged.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2003ab186
2003-08-01
2026-01-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Beasley, C. J., Chambers, R.E., Workman, R. L., Craft, K. L., and Meister, L. J., 1997, Repeatability of 3-D ocean-bottom cable seismic surveys: The Leading Edge, 16, 1281-1285
  2. Hunt, T. M., and Tosha, T., 1994, Precise gravity measurements at Inferno Crater, Waimangu, New Zealand: Geothermics, 23, 573-582
  3. Ikawa, T., Onishi, M., and Kawanaka, T., 2000, Application of seismic reflection method for geothermal exploration in Japan: Geothermal Energy (Journal of Geothermal Energy Development Center, New Energy Foundation, Japan), 25, 114-129 (in Japanese).
  4. Johonston, D., McKenny, R., Verbeek, J., and Almond, J., 1998, Time lapse seismic analysis of Fulmar field: The Leading Edge, 17, 1420-1428.
  5. Massonnet, D., Holzer, T., and Vadon, H., 1997, Land subsidence caused by the East Mesa geothermal field, California, observed using SAR interferometry: Geophysical Reserch Letters, 24,901-904.
  6. Lumley, D., 2001, Time-lapse seismic reservoir monitoring: Geophysics, 66, 50-53
  7. O’Donnel, T. M., Jr., Miller, K. C, and Witcher, J. C, 2001, A seismic and gravity study of the McGregor geothermal system, Southern New Mexico: Geophysics, 66, 1002-1014
  8. Porter-Hirsche, J. L., and Hirsche, K. W., 1998, Repeatabilty study of land data acquisition and processing for time lapse seismic: 68th Ann. Internal Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 9-11
  9. Rickett, J. E., and Lumley, D. E., 2001, Cross-equalization data processing for time-lapse seismic reservor monitoring: A case study from the Gulf of Mexco: Geophysics, 66, 1015-1025
  10. Sass, J. H., and Walters, M. A, 1999, Thermal Regime of the Great Basin and its implications for enhanced geothermal systems and off-grid power: Geothermal Reserch Council Transactions, 23, 211-218
  11. Sønneland, L., Veire, H. H., Raymond, B., Signer, C, Pedersen, L., Ryan, S., and Sayers, C, 1997, Seismic reservoir monitoring on Gullfaks: The Leading Edge, 16, 1247-1252.
  12. Ushijima, K. Mizunaga, H. and Tanaka, T., 1999, Reservoir monitoring by a 4-D electrical technique: The Leading Edge, 18, 1422-1424.
  13. Xu, H. and Nur, A., 2001, Integrating reservoir engineering and satellite remote sensing for (true) continuous time-lapse reservoir monitoring: The Leading Edge, 20, 1176-1179, 1198.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2003ab186
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error